Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-05-06 Thread David Walker
Ignore my question re inet6 wildcards. Asked and answered. From: Stuart Henderson > I think you're "supposed" to do rtsol, but we don't support that on a > device configured as a router. There is afaik no IPv6 address discovery > mechanism done by PPP. Best wishes.

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-05-06 Thread David Walker
From: Stuart Henderson > I just added the address assigned to me into hostname.pppoe0: > inet6 2001:4b10:1002:ff::1 64 > !/sbin/route add -inet6 default 2001:4b10:1002:ff::1 Hi Stuart. Thanks for all the help. I am curious, in pppoe(4) this example is given: inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-04-24, David Walker wrote: > Konnichiwa. > > That is too easy. > Took me all of two minutes to bridge my modem - "RFC2684 BRIDGING" > instead of "PPPoE BRIDGING" - and do the /etc file changes. > Happy as Larry (possibly happier) using pppoe(4). > > All I need to work out is hostname.pppoe

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread David Walker
Konnichiwa. That is too easy. Took me all of two minutes to bridge my modem - "RFC2684 BRIDGING" instead of "PPPoE BRIDGING" - and do the /etc file changes. Happy as Larry (possibly happier) using pppoe(4). All I need to work out is hostname.pppoe0 INET6 wildcards. Especially what to export as th

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread David Walker
From: Stuart Henderson > with one vendor implementation of this, it saves you from having a huge > bunch of entries in your arp table... otherwise: control over the PPP > session, maybe better logging, maybe access to ipv6 or multicast which > could be a problem with some CPE modem/routers, and it

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread Chris Tankersley
Honestly, I think it is going to depend on your ISP. For example, Embarq a few years ago switched their 'Embarq' ISP to using a hybrid DHCP setup: (Whatever the DSLAM connects to)<--PPPoE-->DSLAM<--DHCP-->Modem<--DHCP-> So when you set the modem to 'Bridge' whatever was behind it was set to DH

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-04-24, David Walker wrote: > From: Claudio Jeker >> The main encapsulation over ADSL is PPPoE or PPPoA only lately, with the >> spread of IPTV and VDSL, EFM (Ethernet First Mile) is used by some telcos. >> So it totaly depends on what your provider is giving you. > > Maybe I didn't explai

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-24 Thread David Walker
From: Claudio Jeker > The main encapsulation over ADSL is PPPoE or PPPoA only lately, with the > spread of IPTV and VDSL, EFM (Ethernet First Mile) is used by some telcos. > So it totaly depends on what your provider is giving you. Hi Claudio. Maybe I didn't explain myself or perhaps I am trying

Re: DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-23 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:25:50AM +0930, David Walker wrote: > Guten arben. > > I am wondering what the pros and cons are for using DHCP or PPPoE for > connecting to an ISP via an ADSL modem. > > I expect like a lot of people I set my modem in bridge mode using PPPoE. > In my particular case I u

DHCP versus PPPoE for ADSL.

2009-04-23 Thread David Walker
Guten arben. I am wondering what the pros and cons are for using DHCP or PPPoE for connecting to an ISP via an ADSL modem. I expect like a lot of people I set my modem in bridge mode using PPPoE. In my particular case I use the DHCP server on the modem to assign an IP address to my desktop machin