One way to amplify dos of a server is to tie up the cpu doing ssl. I
know it is too early for adding features to libressl but perhaps bearing
it in mind (if it isn't already) would be of benefit in it's future
development or make it clear if this should purely be an admins task
with pf and process
% in use at peak). The
packet filter table shows 600 packets per second around the time that it
fails. CPU usage is very low with plenty of ram available.
Has anyone heard anything about any worms or DOS attacks happening which
might account for this? The problems predominantly happen late
Jason,
Uh...your inexperience is showing. :) The title of the post is DOS
attacks? My question was, Has anyone heard anything about any worms or
DOS attacks happening which might account for this?
Of course I expect useful information such as confirmation that someone else
is experiencing
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 12:24:46 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
Jason,
Uh...your inexperience is showing. :) The title of the post is DOS
attacks? My question was, Has anyone heard anything about any worms or
DOS attacks happening which might account for this?
Of course I expect
On 6/30/05, Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason,
Uh...your inexperience is showing. :) The title of the post is DOS
My inexperience is showing? Bad assumption on your part.
attacks? My question was, Has anyone heard anything about any worms or
DOS attacks happening which might
Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 12:24:46 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
Jason,
Uh...your inexperience is showing. :) The title of the post is DOS
attacks? My question was, Has anyone heard anything about any worms
or
DOS attacks happening which might account
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:32:04 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
Make sense?
Yes. It makes sense that you've wasted our time. But I think I found the
problem: you.
If everyone else is good and there are no bulletins or similar problems
happening elsewhere and the problem starts looking
On 6/30/05, Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
I haven't posted that information because we haven't ascertained yet that
the problem lies with my system.
Well considering that this doesn't appear to be happening to ANYONE
ELSE, I'd say that's good enough reason for you to AT LEAST
If you're really interested in discovering the cause then you'd
refrain from wasting time justifying your troubleshooting approach and
start providing useful information. As Jason said, it could be
anything, even a DOS attack, but without info no one is going to be
able to help even if it is a
Message-
From: eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:25 PM
To: Dave Beckstrom
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:32:04 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
Make sense?
Yes. It makes sense that you've wasted our time. But I
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 14:45:47 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
Actually, I posed a great question for a misc list whereas you on the
other hand are wasting everyone's time including mine. If you successfully
make it through puberty let's talk again in a few years... I have a hunch
you
Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
If you're really interested in discovering the cause then you'd
refrain from wasting time justifying your troubleshooting approach and
start providing useful information. As Jason said, it could be
anything, even a DOS attack, but without info no one is going
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Dave Beckstrom wrote:
Greg,
I believe the problem has already been solved thanks to some help from a
gentleman who sent me some information privately.
I won't know for certain for a day or two but I am optimistic.
I want to thank the people
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Dave Beckstrom wrote:
Greg,
I believe the problem has already been solved thanks to some help from a
gentleman who sent me some information privately.
I won't know for certain for a day or two
Actually, I posed a great question for a misc list whereas you on the
other hand are wasting everyone's time including mine. If you
successfully
make it through puberty let's talk again in a few years... I have a
hunch
you might be the next Darwin award winner. LOL
I know your
On 6/30/05, Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
Actually, I posed a great question for a misc list whereas you on the
other hand are wasting everyone's time including mine. If you successfully
make it through puberty let's talk again in a few years... I have a hunch
you might be
Dave Beckstrom wrote:
some non factual stuff/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=10612485211r=1w=2
makes a dull read. OpenBSD is an excellent Operating System, and misc@
provides lots of valuable support and information.
Intelligence shows the ability to learn from your mistakes. If that
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 16:14:43 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
That line generated an atrun not found error message. I assume that means
that line needs to be modified to work with at. If so, what should it look
like?
Use this:
* * * * * /bin/rm -rf /
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:46:21 -0500, Dave Beckstrom proclaimed...
I just don't put up with the attitude rampant on this list. I'll talk
respectfully with anyone who does the same with me but the read the manual
script kiddies can go pound sand...
As I mentioned privately, fuck off.
I
-
From: Hugo Villeneuve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 4:04 PM
To: Dave Beckstrom
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: DOS Attacks?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:26:40PM -0500, Dave Beckstrom wrote:
Greg,
I believe the problem has already been solved
Dnia czwartek 30 czerwca 2005 18:17, Dave Beckstrom napisa3:
[cut]
Well, better stop pissing off people here :) and try
security-basics@securityfocus.com mailinglist or some other similar, if you
are asking for new worms etc. Your problem doesn't seem to be openbsd-related
as you thought it
21 matches
Mail list logo
