Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL
On 15:37 Sun 14 Sep, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44
Ling Xiaoheng schrieb:
Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28 10:38:44 MDT 2007
[EMAIL
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 03:37:04PM +0800, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375:
On Sunday 14 September 2008, Ling Xiaoheng wrote:
Hey,guys:
In NetBSD its have adjustkernel perl script can custom your kernel
configuration file,how about OpenBSD?
I custom my OpenBSD kernel configuration and rebuild it,but in the
dmesg I found
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #375: Tue Aug 28
The GENERIC kernel should be sufficient for most all systems
and situations.
I think it's his decision. If he'll do drivers patches and even do
new drivers, if he will use custom mk.conf, and maybe even
custom cvs tree why not use custom kernel config too.
By the way if he'll get problems
On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:16:17 Ivan Arsenyev wrote:
The GENERIC kernel should be sufficient for most all systems
and situations.
I think it's his decision. If he'll do drivers patches and even do
new drivers, if he will use custom mk.conf, and maybe even
custom cvs tree why not
7 matches
Mail list logo