On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:46:20PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=138829898720574=2
and
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=139013674405106=2
might help.
Thanks. This is the critical section:
If you don't use all the interlocked openbsd pieces together, and
replace some of them with your own, then you take on responsibility for
the problems we didn't need to solve because they don't exist in our
complete solution.
I think that is pretty simple.
I hope you understand.
As such, I have
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:32:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
That's intentional.
OK. Since you didn't realise this breaks sysupgrade you might also
not realise it weakens RNG initialisation, it is not recommended
Where can I read more about this?
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=138829898720574=2
and
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=139013674405106=2
might help.
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 14:26 skrev Raul Miller :
>
> A couple minutes of looking things up suggest
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=141807224826859 as a plausible
>
A couple minutes of looking things up suggest
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=141807224826859 as a plausible
starting point for that kind of inquiry.
Take care,
--
Raul
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:15 AM wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:32:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> That's
tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:41:57PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> I resolved the problem. The solution was to run `sysupgrade -n` to
> >> download all the upgrade files, and leave the `bsd.upgrade` kernel in
> >> place, next to the `bsd` kernel I usually
tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:41:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> >I wouldn't call this "resolved". You are missing the point that
> >bsd.upgrade should run automatically. *shrug*
>
> My setup is not standard, so it's normal that bsd.upgrade not run
>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:41:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
I wouldn't call this "resolved". You are missing the point that
bsd.upgrade should run automatically. *shrug*
My setup is not standard, so it's normal that bsd.upgrade not run
automatically. The solution I used, as far as I know,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:41:57PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I resolved the problem. The solution was to run `sysupgrade -n` to
download all the upgrade files, and leave the `bsd.upgrade` kernel in
place, next to the `bsd` kernel I usually boot.
Then, at the next boot, manually boot the
On 2021/10/19 19:30, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:41:57PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > I resolved the problem. The solution was to run `sysupgrade -n` to
> > > download all the upgrade files, and leave the `bsd.upgrade` kernel in
> > > place, next to the
On 2021-10-18, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:14:56PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>>My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
>>`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
>>bsd.upgrade and saw the upgrade process
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:14:56PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
bsd.upgrade and saw the upgrade process scroll past.
I resolved the problem. The solution
On 2021-10-18 14:38 UTC, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:14:56PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>>My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
>>`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
>>bsd.upgrade and saw the
> >For an unusual setup you may need to look into how the
> >install/upgrade script works, see /usr/src/distrib/miniroot.
>
> /usr/src/ is empty on my machine.
>
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/
helps with that, if you don't want to install sources but still need
to see them.
--
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:28:33AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The boot loader looks for /bsd.upgrade with 'x' filesystem permissions.
If present it removes the x flag and boots. (I think this should be
documented in boot(8) for the various arch but is missing).
I agree.
The install
On 2021-10-15, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> It's not documented in the `sysupgrade` manpage.
sysupgrade(8) only describes what sysupgrade does, not the rest of
the mechanism.
The boot loader looks for /bsd.upgrade with 'x' filesystem permissions.
If present it removes the x flag and boots.
It's not documented in the `sysupgrade` manpage.
My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
bsd.upgrade and saw the upgrade process scroll past.
> On Oct 15, 2021, at 3:19 PM, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>
> My setup is a little bit unusual,
Unfortunately you have uttered the magic words that will dissuade most people
on the list from helping you. sysupgrade is only designed to work for people
whose setup is not at all unusual.
18 matches
Mail list logo
