Hi,
...on Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 05:15:14PM -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Between pf, 'ifconfig em0 -inet6' and 'echo family inet4 /etc/resolv.conf'
you should have about all the anti v6 knobs a budding newbie should need.
Thanks for putting all the required info into one place.
Alex.
Hey! I use tn3270.
Well actually c3270 as it is a bit saner when remapping keys.
But I was very presently surprised to find tn3270 in base. Saved my day
once.
And thread hijack. As far as I can tell wscons does not send/set
Shift+Fn keys.
was sort of looking for them as I like to map that
rhubbell wrote:
Thanks for the assist. To me it's simply I don't need IPv6, I don't use
IPv6. I don't want to see any errors from applications that want IPv6.
You dont need tn3270 either, but strangely enough I never see how do I
remove all files that give OpenBSD support for talking tn3270
a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way not to help people out. Instead offering up non-sequitars,
etc.
Come on admit it, you don't know how to disable IPv6. Why does everyone
place so much trust in OpenBSD when the kernel seems to be a mystery to
most here with constant
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places
I'll don the Nomex here and say that rather than turning IPv6 off, I
just block it with pf. I don't know if that is what the OP wants, but
it is relatively simple to do (as opposed to twiddling things in the
kernel) and it keeps me from having to worry about any unexpected
consequences of the
Penned by Corey on 20091206 13:52.42, we have:
| I'll don the Nomex here and say that rather than turning IPv6 off,
| I just block it with pf. I don't know if that is what the OP wants,
| but it is relatively simple to do (as opposed to twiddling things in
| the kernel) and it keeps me from
rhubbell wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#ProbIPv6
There's the official answer.
Nick.
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Is it enabled per-application or is there some magic in a top-level
Makefile somewhere? This IPv6 is like Whak-A-Mole. Or is it just so
pervasive now that it
On Saturday 05 December 2009 14:25:02 rhubbell wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Is it enabled per-application or is there some magic in a top-level
Makefile somewhere? This IPv6
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:39:39 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
You are free of course to make mods, but please understand that you
are on your own for them. I suppose it could also be said that if
Ha, yeah, I feel so alone.
you need help in turning ipv6 off, you shouldn't--learn first how
So you
On Saturday 05 December 2009 15:07:43 rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:39:39 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
You are free of course to make mods, but please understand that you
are on your own for them. I suppose it could also be said that if
Ha, yeah, I feel so alone.
you need
on admit it, you don't know how to disable IPv6. Why does everyone
place so much trust in OpenBSD when the kernel seems to be a mystery to
most here with constant warnings about not fiddling with it
Curiouser and curiouser.
not to help people out. Instead offering up non-sequitars,
etc.
Come on admit it, you don't know how to disable IPv6. Why does everyone
place so much trust in OpenBSD when the kernel seems to be a mystery to
most here with constant warnings about not fiddling with it
At least some developers
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
mostly a waste of time, except for the educational aspects of what not
to do.
Thanks for the nice story. I get a kick out of how far folks here go out
of their way
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
At least some developers hang on misc@ and surely know how to disable
ipv6. The question is: do they care?
In my experience, no.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Jussi Peltola pe...@pelzi.net wrote:
Come on admit it, you don't know how to disable IPv6. Why does everyone
place so much trust in OpenBSD when the kernel seems to be a mystery to
most here with constant warnings about not fiddling with it
At least some
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
Johan Beisser wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:28:09 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:57:58 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
You could also do more digging around yourself.
I'd say that applies to you, not me. (^:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Other than adding rhubbell to the list of people who probably broke
it themselves, not really.
Nothing's broken here. Hope you didn't strain a muscle jumping to
conclusions. (^: Well nothing other than the pervasiveness of IPv6 into
every
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:52:35 +0200
Jussi Peltola wrote:
ipv6. The question is: do they care?
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Needs to be disabled ...to accomplish what goal? Saving of disk
space?
Feeding the troll, sorry.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
I gave you the file where GENERIC for all kernels is
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks here
would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
Well you're especially chipper, now instead of whining on mailing
lists.. how about you try helping yourself?
User: there's a knob I want to twiddle, but don't know how...
Community: Don't
User: but I wanna, I wanna.
Developers: don't, really
User: I know what I'm doing, so there
Community: .
User: why is everyone ignoring me? Where's the love?
Everyone: it's hard to love the village idiot
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:43:32PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
Other than adding rhubbell to the list of people who probably broke
it themselves, not really.
Nothing's broken here. Hope you didn't strain a muscle jumping to
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:01:06 -0800
Johan Beisser wrote:
Feeding the troll, sorry.
Hi, fresh from high school?
I gave you the file where GENERIC for all kernels is configured.
Apparently you don't care enough to even read the thread. But it's ok,
I don't care if you care or not. But thanks at
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are a sphincter of epic proportions.
Sphincter's pretty important. So thanks!
Le me turn on my care meter, oh look at that -10 on the 0 to 1 scale.
Also looking back I see the question was ignored before.
I can figure it
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:10:27 -0800
Allie Daneman wrote:
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
It's not that simple. Applications still try IPv6 even when it's disabled
in the kernel
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled for other applications.
Needs to be disabled
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
here would rather not answer but instead would rather meander about.
Well you're especially chipper, now instead of whining on mailing
lists.. how about you try helping
On 15:59, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:26:36 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
You are a sphincter of epic proportions.
Sphincter's pretty important. So thanks!
Le me turn on my care meter, oh look at that -10 on the 0 to 1 scale.
Also looking back I
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:59:28PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
And please just ignore my posts
if you care that much.
finally you say something that I can relate to.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
On 16:02, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:10:27 -0800
Allie Daneman wrote:
man ifconfig...is a quick and easy way to disable inet6 on any
interface. Beyond that I'm thinking sysctl, did you peruse around before
posting ?
It's not that simple. Applications still
On 16:16, Sat 05 Dec 09, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:59:53 -0800
Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
I have disabled IPv6 in the kernel (via top-level GENERIC) but I can't
see what other places it needs to be disabled
Yeah you said that already.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:28 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:24:42PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:08:30 -0500
Brynet wrote:
Not sure how care plays into this. A simple question that the folks
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 03:07:03 +0100
Michiel van Baak wrote:
Did you even bother to look at a tcpdump when you are running on a
kernel without ipv6 support? Is there any ipv6 traffic when running on a
kernel without ipv6 ?
Again re-read the thread if you need to. Can read the reply to P.
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:07:00 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
finally you say something that I can relate to.
But couldn't resist, eh? (^:
rhubbell the top posting troll wrote:
Yeah you said that already.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
You have asked your questions, quite impolitely.. many have responded
regardless of this.
Marco has kindly given you some further direction, the 'off' in 'fuck
off' would indicate that
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 07:55:11PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:07:00 +
Jacob Meuser wrote:
finally you say something that I can relate to.
But couldn't resist, eh? (^:
no, it was a test to see if you could take your own advice. since you
won't, I am now sure you're
Which apps? I have secret for you ;-) Most of the apps from packages/ports
is not from OpenBSD project, but from people/communities around the world.
So please ask them what to do. In OpenBSD there are at least two ways how
to disable IPv6 for whole system. And in case of problems with app
You are missing whole point of philosophy of OpenBSD. Snippet from one
good book :
The OpenBSD community generally expects users to be advanced computer
users. They have
written extensive documentation about OpenBSD, and expect people to be
willing to read it.
They're not interested in coddling
42 matches
Mail list logo
