apparently the F-35 project sources motherboards for key instrumentation
from China.
This is a new economic cold war. Do what you feel best but a big part of
this is politics.
Maybe the list should qualify when a mail thread is verging on personal
politics and out of strictly technical
Sun, 16 Jun 2019 05:23:36 +0200 ms
> "It looks like at least the reengineering of the firmware
>
> and the analysis of the code could increase the security, to avoid
> security wholes"
> ^^
Your clock is off. Wrong time is a serious reliability & security flaw.
Before you look
On 2019-06-15, ms wrote:
> https://www.golem.de/news/supermicro-diskussion-um-ueberwachungschips-1810-136965.html
>
> https://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Bericht-Winzige-Chips-spionierten-in-Cloud-Servern-von-Apple-und-Amazon-4181461.html
Those are based on the discredited Bloomberg piece I
And I think I read that Supermicro is moving production
out of China because of the perceptions of risk (and/or actual
risks) of sensitive electronics manufacturing there.
Forgive/ignore if this question is excessive here, but I
wonder if anyone has knowledge or educated perspective to share
On 16/6/19 1:23 pm, ms wrote:
>>> Now a day backdors are already on the silicon level (inside chips). They
>>> are declared as debugging interfaces..
>> Must have happened around the time when school dropouts went to business.
>
> What do you want to say? Do you have experience in chip design?
I am sorry for NOT reading my content again before posting it, my fault.
On 16.06.19 06:35, li...@wrant.com wrote:
Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:52:18 +0200 ms
Now a day backdors are already on the silicon level (inside chips). They
are declared as debugging interfaces..
Must have happened around the
Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:52:18 +0200 ms
> Now a day backdors are already on the silicon level (inside chips). They
> are declared as debugging interfaces..
Must have happened around the time when school dropouts went to business.
> It looks like at least the reengineering of the frimware an it is
https://www.golem.de/news/supermicro-diskussion-um-ueberwachungschips-1810-136965.html
https://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Bericht-Winzige-Chips-spionierten-in-Cloud-Servern-von-Apple-und-Amazon-4181461.html
Now a day backdors are already on the silicon level (inside chips). They
are
My understanding is that a well known linux vendor was disabling kernel ACPI
APEI & EINJ parameter support by default.
"ACPI provides an error injection mechanism, EINJ, for debugging and testing
the ACPI Platform Error Interface (APEI) and other RAS features. If
supported by the firmware, ACPI
On 2019-06-15, ms wrote:
> There were some serious security issues with hardware and software from
> Supermicro (espionage chips, firmware)
Assuming you mean the allegations in that Bloomberg piece, there was no
evidence found supporting them.
There were some serious security issues with hardware and software from
Supermicro (espionage chips, firmware)
For me a NoGo!
On 15.06.19 12:52, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
On 15/06/2019 10:36, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Richard Laysell wrote:
Hello,
I
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:36:23 +1000
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Richard Laysell wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was trying OpenBSD on a Supermicro A2SDi-4C-HLN4F which uses an
> > Intel Atom CPU (Denverton). The board boots but most devices are
> > not
On 15/06/2019 10:36, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Richard Laysell wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was trying OpenBSD on a Supermicro A2SDi-4C-HLN4F which uses an Intel
>> Atom CPU (Denverton). The board boots but most devices are not
>> detected because ACPI can't
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Richard Laysell wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was trying OpenBSD on a Supermicro A2SDi-4C-HLN4F which uses an Intel
> Atom CPU (Denverton). The board boots but most devices are not
> detected because ACPI can't be enabled.
>
> Does anyone know if this is
Hello,
I was trying OpenBSD on a Supermicro A2SDi-4C-HLN4F which uses an Intel
Atom CPU (Denverton). The board boots but most devices are not
detected because ACPI can't be enabled.
Does anyone know if this is likely to be supported at some point?
Full dmesg is below
OpenBSD 6.5
15 matches
Mail list logo
