On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:49 PM, mxb m...@alumni.chalmers.se wrote:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
curious to see if it had any effect on ipsec performance.
Regards Tony
test3.pio# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #258: Mon Apr 2
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
curious to see if it had any effect on ipsec performance.
According to
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the
cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the
cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the
5 matches
Mail list logo