Re: John the Ripper limited functionality

2010-11-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi James, James Hozier wrote on Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:19:23PM -0800: > tedu@ wrote: >> speaking of patches, you seem to have >> forgotten to include yours... > What do you mean? I don't have any patches to include AFAIK... See, that's your problem... ;-/ Ted suggests that you read http://

Re: John the Ripper limited functionality

2010-11-28 Thread James Hozier
What do you mean? I don't have any patches to include AFAIK... > From: Ted Unangst > Subject: Re: John the Ripper limited functionality > To: "James Hozier" > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Date: Monday, November 29, 2010, 4:30 AM > speaking of patches, you seem to

Re: John the Ripper limited functionality

2010-11-28 Thread Ted Unangst
speaking of patches, you seem to have forgotten to include yours... On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:19 PM, James Hozier wrote: > The jumbo patch for JTR has a lot of great features but in order to use it you need to compile from source as opposed to installing from packages (or Ports). I think package

John the Ripper limited functionality

2010-11-28 Thread James Hozier
The jumbo patch for JTR has a lot of great features but in order to use it you need to compile from source as opposed to installing from packages (or Ports). I think packages should have it patched by default...JTR without this jumbo patch seems very limited in comparison in terms of its abiliti