Re: OpenBGP: 3 doubts regarding localpref, rib out and announcement

2010-05-24 Thread Eduardo Meyer
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: >> match to $peer_2 prefix X.Y.Z.0/23 set localpref +50 >> >> But it wont work as I need. Please remember X.Y.Z.0/23 is announced by me. > > localpref for outgoing? that is useless. localpref is, well, local, > and not transmitted to the peer.

Re: OpenBGP: 3 doubts regarding localpref, rib out and announcement

2010-05-23 Thread Henning Brauer
* Eduardo Meyer [2010-05-23 13:51]: > Hello, > > I have 3 simple but yet annoying doubts. First, it's about localpref. > Today I have a /23 prefix which I announce only to one peer and which > I also go upstream to this very only peer. However the upstream policy > I had to use "pf route-to" to a

OpenBGP: 3 doubts regarding localpref, rib out and announcement

2010-05-23 Thread Eduardo Meyer
Hello, I have 3 simple but yet annoying doubts. First, it's about localpref. Today I have a /23 prefix which I announce only to one peer and which I also go upstream to this very only peer. However the upstream policy I had to use "pf route-to" to achieve the desired behavior. I could not arrange