On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:46:33AM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:46:35 -0400
> Nick Holland wrote:
>
> >
> > Also...32M would be about the minimum amount of RAM you would want to
> > install on at the moment. If you don't have much of a scrap pile, you
> > may
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:46:35 -0400
Nick Holland wrote:
>
> Also...32M would be about the minimum amount of RAM you would want to
> install on at the moment. If you don't have much of a scrap pile, you
> may have difficulty expanding old machines to the useful minimum.
>
> Nick.
>
>
16M will
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:19:16PM +0300, bsduser bsduser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a pentium-pro 100 MHz laying around. To make use of it, I wanted to
> install openbsd 3.4 on it (openbsd 3.4 because that
> was the distro that I have).
Why not use something more modern? Old releases are unsupported
bsduser bsduser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a pentium-pro 100 MHz laying around.
I'm not even going to try helping you with the specifics when you
provide blatant misinformation like that. (see the specs of available
PPro systems..bottom end was 150MHz)
> To make use of it, I wanted to
> install ope
Hi,
I had a pentium-pro 100 MHz laying around. To make use of it, I wanted to
install openbsd 3.4 on it (openbsd 3.4 because that
was the distro that I have).
The machine is a bare bones machine that I had used a long time ago. Did nto
get rid of it, so thought why not use it by having a bsd OS o
5 matches
Mail list logo
