Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-05 Thread Nick Holland
Greg Thomas wrote: On 11/2/07, Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:00:32 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote I want to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 and I see I am supposed to perform 4.0-4.1 first. That's correct. :) Hmmm, on my second upgrade today I did a 4.0 to 4.2 upgrade,

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-05 Thread Greg Thomas
On 11/5/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greg Thomas wrote: Hmmm, on my second upgrade today I did a 4.0 to 4.2 upgrade, i.e. threw the 4.2 CD in a 4.0 machine, upgraded, and then followed the directions for 4.0 to 4.1 and 4.1 to 4.2. Am I putting myself at risk? eh. The

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-04 Thread Greg Thomas
On 11/2/07, Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:00:32 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote I want to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 and I see I am supposed to perform 4.0-4.1 first. That's correct. :) Hmmm, on my second upgrade today I did a 4.0 to 4.2 upgrade, i.e. threw the 4.2 CD

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-03 Thread Karel Kulhavy
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: Karel, stop pretending. Everyone who can google your name will find out You are implicitly saying that I am pretending. By principle you cannot know it because the only mind you have access into is your own. For more information, see

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-03 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 12:44:50PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: Karel, stop pretending. Everyone who can google your name will find out You are implicitly saying that I am pretending. By principle you cannot know it because the

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-02 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:00:32 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote I want to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 and I see I am supposed to perform 4.0-4.1 first. That's correct. :) Pay special attention to mail/* if you are using something other than the default Sendmail(8) configuration. - I use Exim so I

Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-02 Thread Karel Kulhavy
I want to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 and I see I am supposed to perform 4.0-4.1 first. But some things are unclear to me in http://openbsd.org/faq/upgrade41.html: Pay special attention to mail/* if you are using something other than the default Sendmail(8) configuration. - I use Exim so I should do

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-02 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How do I figure out what local changes I did? Is there something like the cvs diff command? cvs diff would give you some useful info. I tend to use mergemaster plus pay attention to the upgrade notes. I have the system over a year and if I needed to

Re: Questions to 4.0-4.1 upgrade

2007-11-02 Thread Tobias Ulmer
Karel, stop pretending. Everyone who can google your name will find out rather quickly that you're not the stupid idiot that needs to spam misc@ with boring questions like this. On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 02:00:32PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: I want to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.2 and I see I am