On 5/6/08, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use them for firewalls and disk servers. For that they work
quite well. Yes, graphics are painfully slow, but I think that's the
fault of the integrated graphics. Using a PCI graphics card seems
to speed them up quite a bit.
One of them I
On 4/9/08, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=2088
would this be good news for the community? This is really mainly
Linux-related, but i'm hoping that their mention of technical
documentation will be good
* frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-09 22:19]:
hmm, on Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:35:18PM -0400, bofh said that
Sun learnt a lot of lessons when it tried to merge sparc and x86 code bases
together around the solaris 2.4 time, iirc. That's why things like zfs are
endian neutral.
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:12:49PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:35:18PM -0400, bofh said that
Sun learnt a lot of lessons when it tried to merge sparc and x86 code bases
together around the solaris 2.4 time, iirc. That's why things like zfs are
endian
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 03:41:54AM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Yes, I noticed it's there - but does the driver support all of the
available
capabilities?
according to BUGS in envy(4), no. but emu(4) doesn't
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:36:51PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
- first, envy24 is a generic digital only chip; it's connected to
up to 4 codecs that do the analog-digital conversions and that
hold the gain knobs. So to add support for a new cards we must
add support for its
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:47:37PM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:36:51PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
- first, envy24 is a generic digital only chip; it's connected to
up to 4 codecs that do the analog-digital conversions and that
hold the gain
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:25:50PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
well, if both codecs and the digital chip are well documented, how
they are connected is not too hard to guess. There's an EEPROM that
gives hints.
You're right: if. ;)
But found some more info about the other chips:
On 2008-04-09, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=2088
would this be good news for the community?
Too early to say, they haven't released anything yet.
http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=2088
would this be good news for the community? This is really mainly
Linux-related, but i'm hoping that their mention of technical
documentation will be good enough for Open to be able to support them...
hmm, on Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:25:25AM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that
It took us a very long time to get Sun to do this, and it was totally
worth it. It is kind of strange to us to have Sun suddenly be the
perfect example of openness.
a bit OT, but
i just had the pleasure of meeting and
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:07 PM, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a bit OT, but
i just had the pleasure of meeting and ex-sun employee, working
mostly on kernel stuff. i dont know how similar the opensolaris
and solaris kernels are, but he said the solaris kernel code is
a beauty to
hmm, on Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:35:18PM -0400, bofh said that
Sun learnt a lot of lessons when it tried to merge sparc and x86 code bases
together around the solaris 2.4 time, iirc. That's why things like zfs are
endian neutral. OpenBSD started in the multi cpu world to begin with.
i might
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:07:08PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
It took us a very long time to get Sun to do this, and it was totally
worth it. It is kind of strange to us to have Sun suddenly be the
perfect example of openness.
So, perhaps the best audio-option would be something using
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:57:05PM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:07:08PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
It took us a very long time to get Sun to do this, and it was totally
worth it. It is kind of strange to us to have Sun suddenly be the
perfect example
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:49:07PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
So, perhaps the best audio-option would be something using VIA Envy24(HT) -
which is reportedly better than Audigy(2)? Time to swap?
envy(4) already exists in -current (and will be in 4.3). doesn't support
the HT version
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:11:47AM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:49:07PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
So, perhaps the best audio-option would be something using VIA Envy24(HT)
-
which is reportedly better than Audigy(2)? Time to swap?
envy(4) already
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Yes, I noticed it's there - but does the driver support all of the available
capabilities?
according to BUGS in envy(4), no. but emu(4) doesn't support all
the features of the emu10k1 chips, either.
I understand - but the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Zbigniew Baniewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
Yes, I noticed it's there - but does the driver support all of the
available
capabilities?
according to BUGS in envy(4), no. but emu(4) doesn't
Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=2088
would this be good news for the community? This is really mainly
Linux-related, but i'm hoping that their mention of technical
documentation will be good enough for Open to be able
20 matches
Mail list logo
