Pedro, You probably won't get too much more hand-holding
here. You really should have a good look at the tools
available to you before you post to this list.
man is your friend, google is your library index.
Gentelmen,
Sorry if I ran into the Big Boys forum crying. I will be more cautious
pichi wrote:
Sorry if I ran into the Big Boys forum crying. I will be more cautious about
what I ask next time. Is there a forum for people who are starting out with
OpenBSD?
Read all of this page, noting the word 'Newbies'
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq2.html#MailLists
The thing is I am
pichi wrote:
Sorry if I ran into the Big Boys forum crying. I will be more cautious about
what I ask next time. Is there a forum for people who are starting out with
OpenBSD? The thing is I am new to it and I am in a situation where reading
pages and pages of Google is taking a lot of time away
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Craig Skinner wrote:
SNIP
Now you are crying like a girl. Your problems are not this list's problems.
Craig
I find that statement incredibly offensive. I think a more appropriate
statement is:
Now you are crying like a closeted cross-dressing British man
diana
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 06:51:19AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Craig Skinner wrote:
SNIP
Now you are crying like a girl. Your problems are not this list's problems.
Craig
I find that statement incredibly offensive. I think a more appropriate
statement is:
Now you
wait that is no better!
how about:
unshaved bloody communist!
This statement is offensive to creatures like me, whose main food
source is fresh blood.
Miod
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Craig Skinner wrote:
Diana Eichert wrote:
B
I find that statement incredibly offensive. I think a more appropriate
statement is:
Now you are crying like a closeted cross-dressing British man
You should not talk about your husband like that.
Geez, what planet rock did
Diana Eichert wrote:
Geez, what planet rock did you crawl out from underneath? I think I've
been the out lesbian on misc@ for years.
Actually I was thinking about your poor wife when I wrote that.
Don't bother, none of my current wives are lesbians, they'll not return
the favor. ;-)
fresh pom blood perchance?
Fresh luser blood.
Non Ex Transverso Sed Deorsum...
Now, please return to discussing openbsd...
-Bob
Dave,
Thanks so much for your help. I have never touched perl but I will give it a
try. Still, I have other questiones:
1. What software will I need to install on the firewalll in order for this
script to work?
2. Is there any danger in having this kind of software on a publically
accessable
For question 1:
perl should be part of the base install.
From a 4.1 box, base install, NO X, packages installed, etc.
$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for i386-openbsd
[cut]
The Socket module should also be there:
$ perl -e 'use strict; use Socket; print(hello\n);'
hello
For question
The Socket module should also be there:
$ perl -e 'use strict; use Socket; print(hello\n);'
hello
Thanks,
I have perl installed:
$perl -v
$This is perl, v5.8.8 built for i386-openbsd
but it looks like I dont have the socket module becuase when I do:
$perl -e
I get:
$No code specified for
It's telling you exactly what's wrong - you have not specified any
code for the -e option.
man perl:
SYNOPSIS
perl [ -sTuU ] [ -hv ] [ -V[:configvar] ]
[ -cw ] [ -d[:debugger] ] [ -D[number/list] ]
[ -pna ] [ -Fpattern ] [ -l[octal] ] [ -0[octal] ]
[
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of pichi
Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2007 4:05 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Define hosts lookup for pf.conf
Dave,
Thanks so much for your help. I have never touched perl but I
will give
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of pichi
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:52 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Define hosts lookup for pf.conf
The Socket module should also be there:
$ perl -e 'use strict; use Socket; print
-Original Message-
Hello,
I was wondering if there was a way to name hosts in pf.conf
so when I did a
pfctl -s all I could see the STATES table with hostnames instead of ip
addresses. It would make troubleshooting a lot easier
espcially when the
STATES table starts to get real
16 matches
Mail list logo
