Hi,
Transport mode IPSec has many legit uses. The first one which springs to mind
is gateway-gateway encryption, over which you can use your favourite tunneling
protocol e.g. L2TP or GRE. Especially useful if you're transporting multicast
traffic over the VPN.
Also one of the most popular
Hi,
On Sun, 23.05.2010 at 11:41:27 +0200, Martin PelikC!n
martin.peli...@gmail.com wrote:
It really depends on what you need - most road warriors are okay with
transport mode (where obviously DHCP doesn't make any sense). If
I'd say that transport mode is a design error in IPSEC and should be
2010/5/22, dontek don...@gmail.com:
Yes, thanks, I've read the man pages. I've even made the proposed
connection
work both ways. (less the DHCP working) What I was hoping for was a few
that
have more experience than I do to share their experiences and tell me some
of
the potential
-Original Message-
From: Martin PelikC!n [mailto:martin.peli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:19 AM
To: dontek
Cc: Misc OpenBSD
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.7 as VPN Gateway for Road Warriors, Preferred
Configuration
Hi
did you actually read any piece of documentation about
-Original Message-
From: Wouter Slegers [mailto:wou...@yourcreativesolutions.nl]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 5:23 AM
To: dontek
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.7 as VPN Gateway for Road Warriors, Preferred
Configuration
In my situation with multiple Road Warriors, is one way more correct than
Hi
did you actually read any piece of documentation about the topic?
Manual pages like ipsec(4) for overview, ipsec.conf(5) for
configuration and isakmpd(8) + keynote(3,4,5) + openssl(1) + authpf(8)
for possible ways of authenticating your warriors.
I've found many examples via Google. Some are
2010/5/21 Martin Pelikan martin.peli...@gmail.com:
What's the preferred method in the day of OpenBSD 4.7?
To search before typing?
+1
7 matches
Mail list logo
