Hello Rico,
Friday, April 27, 2007, 2:25:59 PM, you wrote:
I don't know if it is a good idea or not, but I read about
this patch yesterday and at first, I was pretty excited. I
have been handed the requirement to move an FTP server to
something more secure. All the other requirements that
Read the web page, it explains the reasoning right at the top. If you
are instead being disingenuous (yes yes, I know you are) perhaps you
could explain to us why you think this isn't a good idea.
On 4/26/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point again?
On Fri, Apr 27,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point again?
What part didn't you understand?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:13:12AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if
On 4/27/07, Chris Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the web page, it explains the reasoning right at the top. If you
are instead being disingenuous (yes yes, I know you are) perhaps you
could explain to us why you think this isn't a good idea.
i wouldnt propose to speak for Marco (or
Hi,
On Apr 27, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On 4/27/07, Chris Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the web page, it explains the reasoning right at the top. If
you
are instead being disingenuous (yes yes, I know you are) perhaps you
could explain to us why you think this isn't
On 4/27/07, Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Apr 27, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
On 4/27/07, Chris Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the web page, it explains the reasoning right at the top. If
you
are instead being disingenuous (yes yes, I know you are)
On 4/27/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point again?
What part didn't you understand?
why are you asking this list about somebody else's patch? ask the
somebody else if their patch works.
On 4/26/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.9?
Instead of asking, try the patch.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point again?
What part didn't you understand?
why are you asking this
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:34:52 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the point
That is the most ignorant statement I have ever seen.
I guess we can assume there will be no future versions
of openssh because openssh developers have already
thought of everything.
Good luck with that attitude.
On 4/27/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at
On 4/28/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:03 -0700
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why are you asking this list about somebody else's patch?
Because I was looking for people using OpenBSD who might have issues with
this patch.
Nobody will have any
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:41:14 -0400
Steven Harms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is the most ignorant statement I have ever seen.
You misunderstand.
I guess we can assume there will be no future versions
of openssh because openssh developers have already
thought of everything.
Good luck
On Friday 27 April 2007 14:41:14 Steven Harms wrote:
That is the most ignorant statement I have ever seen.
I guess we can assume there will be no future versions
of openssh because openssh developers have already
thought of everything.
Good luck with that attitude.
It is not ignorance or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Marco Peereboom
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:28 PM
To: Rico Secada
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: SSHJail patch for OpenBSD
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:15:02 -0400
stuart van Zee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Marco Peereboom
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:28 PM
To: Rico Secada
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: SSHJail patch
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:14:32 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:08:31PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:27:58 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
I don't know if it is a good idea or not, but I read about
this patch yesterday and at first, I was pretty excited. I
have been handed the requirement to move an FTP server to
something more secure. All the other requirements that
have been given to me for this have very strongly pointed
right
Rico Secada wrote:
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.9?
Best regards
Rico
Honestly, you should have a look at sysjail (http://sysjail.bsd.lv)
which is probably a better and more
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:38:48 +0200
Renaud Allard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rico Secada wrote:
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.9?
Best regards
Rico
Honestly, you
What's the point again?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:13:12AM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
Hi
Before I testrun this http://paradigma.pt/~gngs/sshjail/ does anyone
already know if this patch would work with OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.9?
Best regards
Rico
21 matches
Mail list logo
