Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-18 Thread Edd Barrett
Hello again, On 17/07/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible. How to configure the mount port is in the man page for mount_nfs(8). Yes there are 2 ports needed as far as i can see: 1) nfsd port 2) mountd port I'm unsure which the man page is describing. -- Best Regards

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-18 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Edd Barrett wrote: Hello again, On 17/07/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is possible. How to configure the mount port is in the man page for mount_nfs(8). Yes there are 2 ports needed as far as i can see: 1) nfsd port 2) mountd port I'm unsure

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/07/18 12:56, J.C. Roberts wrote: NFS over SSH can be done, but most would consider it wonky for personal mad hackery, and no one in their right mind would never expect *END*USERS* to ever get it right. Possibly, with tun forwarding. Current best practice for this sort of thing in

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-17 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Edd Barrett wrote: Hi, Also AFS is i386 only. -- Best Regards Edd Hi Edd, I was curious if you ever found a decent answer for your question on secure network file systems? The only way I can think of doing it is kerberos and NFSv4.

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-17 Thread Edd Barrett
HI, On 17/07/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Edd, I was curious if you ever found a decent answer for your question on secure network file systems? Not really. I have signed up for free academic licenses of sharity (not light), as sharity-light seemed to be sketchy on file

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-17 Thread Rick Macklem
I was curious if you ever found a decent answer for your question on secure network file systems? The only way I can think of doing it is kerberos and NFSv4. http://mailman.theapt.org/listinfo/openbsd-nfsv4 http://mailman.theapt.org/pipermail/openbsd-nfsv4/2007-January/88.html I

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-17 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Edd Barrett wrote: HI, On 17/07/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Edd, I was curious if you ever found a decent answer for your question on secure network file systems? Not really. I have signed up for free academic licenses of sharity (not light),

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-15 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, Also AFS is i386 only. -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-14 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On 14/07/07, Markus Lude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats your problem with AFS? It's not in base. -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-14 Thread Landry Breuil
2007/7/14, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, On 14/07/07, Markus Lude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats your problem with AFS? It's not in base. man -k afs seems to say that AFS is in base, using ARLA implementation. (and OpenAFS is in ports) Landry

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-14 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote: man -k afs seems to say that AFS is in base, using ARLA implementation. (and OpenAFS is in ports) Only the Arla _client_ is in base. -- Antoine

Re: Secure Network File System - Or Lack Thereof

2007-07-14 Thread Will Maier
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: man -k afs seems to say that AFS is in base, using ARLA implementation. This is true, but ARLA doesn't have a production server implementation available. The AFS client is great (and obviously) interoperates with OpenAFS servers).