Hello Henning,
I wasn't aware that I need permission to continue a thread.
Excuse me for my missunderstanding, but think I'm not involved in the
release and compile procedures. If you don't like to answer, please
don't.
As a matter of fact, most of list users preffer to joke and to write
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:22:19AM +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote:
Hello Henning,
I wasn't aware that I need permission to continue a thread.
Excuse me for my missunderstanding, but think I'm not involved in the
release and compile procedures. If you don't like to answer, please
don't.
As a
Maybe some of user will eventually
get a clue glueing all the answer scattered on this list and FAQ.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#shamismatch
That entry contains all the relevant details end users should need,
which is we're aware that checksum mismatches happen on snapshots;
it's not
Hi Henning,
It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
don't cut and paste out of context.
Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You have spent a lot
of time bitching and no time to give a damn clear answer.
It's not my problem that you attract idiots ( I
Methinks this project is somehow about good code, not good moods.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Mihai Popescu
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:19 AM
To: misc
Subject: Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
Hi Henning
So the process I thought about it's not true. Better to remove the
SHA256 then, what purpose can it serve if it is not syncronised?
I still don't figure out why this checksum missmatch is ( on the same
server, not among servers).
The troll haas been planted.
Henning was being nice. This stupid question keeps coming up. Yes, it
is a stupid question and yes it is annoying and yes Henning should
remind you of that. The so called good answers have been provided a
trillion times by now. Learn how to use the internet or get of it.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011
2011/2/8 Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com:
Hi Henning,
It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
don't cut and paste out of context.
Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You have spent a lot
of time bitching and no time to give a damn clear answer.
It's
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:59 AM, fqui nonez fquinon...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/8 Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com:
Hi Henning,
It looks like you are in a bad mood. Please read my entire post and
don't cut and paste out of context.
Man, if you do not want to answer, please don't. You
On 02/08/11 19:29, patric conant wrote:
I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
saved with RTFM@MP.
Lo and behold! The future is already here!
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc
;-)
On 02/08/11 22:06, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 02/08/11 19:29, patric conant wrote:
I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
saved with RTFM@MP.
Ah. _man_ page. not _web_ page. well, nm.
/Alexander
Lo and behold! The future is already here!
I am not so educated as others, i use OBSD since 2001-2002, with many
dificulties, but i have undertood that there are only 2 different kind
of persons. Developers and users, developers work for them, and users
recive the collateral benefit using OBSD.
If you use OpenBSD since 2001-2002 I think
Hello all,
Things got out of my hand and I want to say something and close this thread.
There were some other posts in this thread which I consider are
off-topic. I got also direct email telling me I should not blame
Henning and other developers.
I will try again to explain, moving myself
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:29, patric conant mirage.comput...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the idea of a misc@ man page, think of all the typing that could be
saved with RTFM@MP.
RTFFAQ?
.
No problem!
$ rtfmmp() { lynx --dump
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscw=2r=1s=$1q=b; | more; }
$ rtfmmp sha256
...
1. 2011-02-08 [9]Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
2. 2011-02-08 [11]Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
3. 2011-02-08 [13]Re: is SHA256 file used or not ?
4. 2011-02-08 [15]Re
On 02/08/11 12:45, Mihai Popescu wrote:
OK, reading this, what to do next? If I will be concerned, i will
wait. But why I should be concerned ? If I'm not concerned, can I
install with wrong checksum? ...
I think you need this:
http://psychcentral.com/therapy/
On 02/08/11 15:45, Mihai Popescu wrote:
...
I will send here another thing. I hope it will be received nicely. I
mean I don't know how to tell it to be nice for everyone. But I will
tell it: parts of FAQ go into being more difficult and more abstract
than the style it use to be back in time.
I've been told I succeed from time to time. :)
Men I fell bad now! Only from time to time!?
Men, you are doing an incredible job and I sure hell do not envy you by
a very long shut!
I am the first buyer of Nick book with plenty of Nick-isims in it! (;
The FAQ is actually what got me going
I'm not sure I got it right, because I'm not familiar with the
checksum procedure.
I will make a short text below, to show how I see the process and
maybe someone can pinpoint the mistakes.
The *.tgz files are obtained by tree compilation so there is a new set
and sha256s are compiled for each
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:49:29 +0200
Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
please tell me how to use this SHA256 file then?
There was a thread recently about this where theo threatened to remove
them, please don't.
It is only guaranteed for releases and not snapshots, where it will be
hit and
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:27:52AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:49:29 +0200
Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
please tell me how to use this SHA256 file then?
There was a thread recently about this where theo threatened to remove
them, please don't.
It is
Hello.
Mihai Popescu mihaipbs () gmail ! com wrote:
Hello
I'm installing ... from snapshots.
SHA256 invalid checksums ...
... SHA256 from ftp.openbsd.org ...
Some good search terms there.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Aopenbsd.org+snapshot+install+sha256
So the process I thought about it's not true. Better to remove the
SHA256 then, what purpose can it serve if it is not syncronised?
I still don't figure out why this checksum missmatch is ( on the same
server, not among servers).
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:38:37PM +0100, Benjamin Nadland wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:27:52AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:49:29 +0200
Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
please tell me how to use this SHA256 file then?
There was a thread recently
Howdy.
Mihai Popescu mihaipbs () gmail ! com wrote:
So the process I thought about it's not true. Better to remove the
SHA256 then, what purpose can it serve if it is not syncronised?
Some guy said ...
Do you not want it to be there for official releases?
How about if I remove the code now.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
So the process I thought about it's not true. Better to remove the
SHA256 then, what purpose can it serve if it is not syncronised?
Practice for release, perhaps? If they cause too much of an uproar in
snapshots, then
Hello Philip Guenther,
It looks like your answer is the most valuable for me. So, by my
understanding, the developer compiles and gets the *.tgz files,
uploads them to the ftp server but he doesn't compile the sha256
checksum each times for those files. I don't know why, because i'm not
familiar
* Mihai Popescu mihai...@gmail.com [2011-02-07 21:26]:
It looks like your answer is the most valuable for me. So, by my
understanding, the developer compiles and gets the *.tgz files,
uploads them to the ftp server but he doesn't compile the sha256
checksum each times for those files. I don't
I'm installing from time to time the -current from snapshots. Today I
run in an old issue: SHA256 invalid checksums for base install.
The situation is like this: SHA256 from ftp.openbsd.org has a file
with checksums for x* packages. The same file on ftp
openbsd.informatik.erlangen.de dosn't
* Miod Vallat m...@online.fr [2011-02-06 20:02]:
I'm installing from time to time the -current from snapshots. Today I
run in an old issue: SHA256 invalid checksums for base install.
The situation is like this: SHA256 from ftp.openbsd.org has a file
with checksums for x* packages. The same
30 matches
Mail list logo
