In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pedro Martelletto writes:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one.
It *is* a FFS problem. The superblocks are different.
The BSD disklabel provides information not only about
How could I possibly have missed that question...
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
By the way, when will ffs2 be available in OpenBSD? From the changelogs
I see that there is some work being done in preparation for ffs2, these
are excellent news.
Kernel support
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
but certainly diverging disklabels can explain the problem I outlined
in the first message to this thread
Uh, yes, maybe. I didn't read it, to be honest. I just looked at the Ted
mail you were pointed at. That's definitely talking
filesystems between NetBSD and OpenBSD
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pedro Martelletto writes:
How could I possibly have missed that question...
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
By the way, when will ffs2 be available in OpenBSD? From the changelogs
I see
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pedro Martelletto writes:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
but certainly diverging disklabels can explain the problem I outlined
in the first message to this thread
Uh, yes, maybe. I didn't read it, to be honest. I just looked at
On 9/5/06, Igor Sobrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File
System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern
[...] Can it be
a problem when sharing these drives with non-i386 architectures?
Guessing that
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:13, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File
System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern
is not getting a workaround for this problem (hopefully, I found one)
but understanding if
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Quast writes:
On 9/5/06, Igor Sobrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to understand an odd behaviour in the Berkeley Fast File
System as implemented in both NetBSD and OpenBSD. My main concern
[...] Can it be
a problem when sharing
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:24, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Hi viq!
Sorry, I have read your message right now (...I am not subscribed to
this mailing list, I was looking at MARC as it seems the most up to
date archive, and found your answer.)
Thanks a lot for the excellent reference you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], viq writes:
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:24, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Thanks a lot for the excellent reference you provided in your email.
Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one. And
it seems a serious one!
I was about to just mention
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Indeed, it is a BSD disklabel related problem not a ffs's one.
It *is* a FFS problem. The superblocks are different.
-p.
11 matches
Mail list logo
