Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-22 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Many helpful people wrote: [snip] Thanks to all for so many replies :-) You have convinced me that relying only on Sender/Recipient is really a bad idea. I will try the mentioned patch(es) that whitelist a complete /24 subnet. Regards, Heinrich

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 21 June 2005 20:02 -0600, Steve Williams wrote: What is the best way to add entries from greylisting.org to my spamd-white table? Personally I've been keeping them separate, e.g. table spamd persist table spamd-white persist table spamd-nogrey persist file /etc/spamd-nogrey rdr proto

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
eric wrote: On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 15:17:14 +0200, Heinrich Rebehn proclaimed... I have configured spamd with greylisting on our OpenBSD Firewall and it works very well, spam went close to zero :-). There is one issue though that can cause long delay of mails: If a mail is sent via a server

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Todd C. Miller
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] so spake Heinrich Rebehn (rebehn): Would it be possible to change this behaviour so that the whitelisting is done as soon as the same sender/receiver pair is seen again, ignoring the ip address? This could speed up things a bit. This would allow in mail

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 21 June 2005 15:17 +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Would it be possible to change this behaviour so that the whitelisting is done as soon as the same sender/receiver pair is seen again, ignoring the ip address? This could speed up things a bit. If you do that, what IP address should you

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Frank Bax
At 09:17 AM 6/21/05, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: I have configured spamd with greylisting on our OpenBSD Firewall and it works very well, spam went close to zero :-). There is one issue though that can cause long delay of mails: If a mail is sent via a server pool, it can take quite long until it

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Joseph C. Bender
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Frank Bax wrote: Whitelist them manually? http://greylisting.org/whitelisting.shtml Which is what I'm doing at the office. There's 2 things that greylisting is good at. The first thing is stopping spam and worms. The second thing is exposing every

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Steve Williams
This is where SPF actually comes in handy. Just look at the spf record for that domain and manually whitelist that. No, simply go to http://www.greylisting.org/whitelisting.shtml and whitelist them manually :) -Bob Hi, This is a timely thread as I am just trying to

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 21 June 2005 14:24 -0600, Steve Williams wrote: What is the best way to add entries from greylisting.org to my spamd-white table? Personally I've been keeping them separate, e.g. table spamd persist table spamd-white persist table spamd-nogrey persist file /etc/spamd-nogrey rdr proto

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:17:14 +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: Hi all, I have configured spamd with greylisting on our OpenBSD Firewall and it works very well, spam went close to zero :-). There is one issue though that can cause long delay of mails: If a mail is sent via a server pool, it can

Re: spamd greylisting and server pools

2005-06-21 Thread Steve Williams
--On 21 June 2005 14:24 -0600, Steve Williams wrote: What is the best way to add entries from greylisting.org to my spamd-white table? Personally I've been keeping them separate, e.g. table spamd persist table spamd-white persist table spamd-nogrey persist file /etc/spamd-nogrey rdr