hmm, on Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:12:32PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty said that
I wonder if there's a buffering thing going on. Under both os's, what
happens if you time it from the start of dd to the time the light stops
flashing and you could remove the stick. Perhaps linux's dd is
returning
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:45:44PM +0200, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
Hi there,
First, I just received my OpenBSD 4.3 CD set. Thanks for another release!
Since the harddisk on my laptop was full and I was eager to give 4.3 a
spin, I installed in on a USB stick. The read and write performance of
Hi frantisek,
I would be much interested in reading any report about the instllation
of OpenBSD on such a laptop... If you give it a try, please let me
know. You can send me off-list emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go for it!
Pau
2008/4/12, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hmm, on Fri, Apr 11,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:04:10PM -0500, Dale Rahn wrote:
I presume that /dev/sd0c or sdN[a-k] was used to access the USB device
this goes thru the buffer cache which defeats the use of larger blocks under
OpenBSD. To accurately compare the I/O speeds use /dev/rsd0c, the raw device.
Hi there,
First, I just received my OpenBSD 4.3 CD set. Thanks for another release!
Since the harddisk on my laptop was full and I was eager to give 4.3 a
spin, I installed in on a USB stick. The read and write performance of the
stick was much less than I expected, based on how the stick
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:45:44PM +0200, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
Since the harddisk on my laptop was full and I was eager to give 4.3 a
spin, I installed in on a USB stick. The read and write performance of the
stick was much less than I expected, based on how the stick performs under
Linux (on
6 matches
Mail list logo
