In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Holland wrote:
Dumping the data from one disk to another is fine and dandy when you
are talking about your 40G disk on your home or desktop computer,
the fact that you are down for a few hours is no big deal. But what
about a server? I don't care how
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:04:34PM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
What do you consider a sane number of front ends, 10, less, more?
Well, I think that depends on too many variables. I have a movie server
(OBSD) that exports NFS to two home theatre computers (FBSD). The movie
server is a dual
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 00:36]:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea; you'll need very beefy
fileservers and a fast network.
NFS may actually be useful; if you really need the files in one
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 00:36]:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea; you'll need very beefy
fileservers and a fast network.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 09:03:54AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
from my observations redundancy is the biggest problem with NFS
and that its ability to efficiently serve up data is more than
ample.
Redundancy is certainly a problem, but lots of US HPC and
distributed computing sites have
Joachim Schipper wrote:
there is nothing wrong with serving directly from NFS.
Really? You have a lot more experience in this area, so I will defer to
you if you are sure, but it seems to me that in the sort of system I
explicitly assumed (something like a web farm), serving everything
Jason Beaudoin wrote:
snip
Use all the tricks you can for YOUR solution, including:
* lots of small partitions
What are the reasonings behind this?
Thanks for the awesome post!
I think it runs something like this
If there is a problem somewhere on the disk,
if it's all one big
Bullshit. just use NFS :)
-Bob
* Steven Harms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-19 17:01]:
This isn't an OpenBSD specific solution, but you should be able to use an
EMC san to accomplish this (we use a fiber channel setup)
On 4/19/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 14:49]:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 00:36]:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea;
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:56:16PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 14:49]:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 00:36]:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100,
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 14:49]:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 00:36]:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is
On Friday 20 April 2007 08:32, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Jason Beaudoin wrote:
snip
Use all the tricks you can for YOUR solution, including:
* lots of small partitions
What are the reasonings behind this?
Thanks for the awesome post!
I think it runs something like this
If there
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Friday 20 April 2007 08:32, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Jason Beaudoin wrote:
snip
Use all the tricks you can for YOUR solution, including:
* lots of small partitions
What are the reasonings behind this?
Thanks for the awesome post!
I think it runs
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 03:22:07PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
How Do you handle when you have to Serve terrabytes of Data through
http/https/ftp etc?
Put it on Differrent machines and use some knid of
loadbalancer/intelligent program that directs to the right mahine?
use some kind of
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea; you'll need very beefy
fileservers and a fast network.
NFS may actually be useful; if you really need the files in one
directory space for management/updates that's a way to do it (i.e.
mount all the various storage servers by NFS on a management
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea; you'll need very beefy
fileservers and a fast network.
NFS may actually be useful; if you really need the files in one
directory space for management/updates that's a way to do it (i.e.
mount all the various storage servers by
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:51:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an idea; you'll need very beefy
fileservers and a fast network.
NFS may actually be useful; if you really need the files in one
directory space for management/updates that's a way to do it
This isn't an OpenBSD specific solution, but you should be able to use an
EMC san to accomplish this (we use a fiber channel setup)
On 4/19/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/04/19 18:08, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I don't think NFS/AFS is that good an
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
How Do you handle when you have to Serve terrabytes of Data through
http/https/ftp etc?
Put it on Differrent machines and use some knid of
loadbalancer/intelligent program that directs to the right mahine?
use some kind of clustering Software?
Waht hardware do
Hi,
How Do you handle when you have to Serve terrabytes of Data through
http/https/ftp etc?
Put it on Differrent machines and use some knid of
loadbalancer/intelligent program that directs to the right mahine?
use some kind of clustering Software?
Waht hardware do you use to make your System
20 matches
Mail list logo
