On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Imre Oolberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I have been using for some time now carp failover and i am very content with
it, thank you!
I run some tests and i just wanted to confirm that in order to run dhcpd
service one has to run it on a physical
Richard Daemon wrote:
I'm just curious, why run dhcpd on a carp interface? What's the reason
for wanting to do this?
If you point to the fact that since dhcpd is a service which from the
client's point of view does not run on fixed ip address but rather so to
say in a broadcast domain
Hi!
(private) HKS wrote:
Your carp interface won't be doing much for you if it doesn't have an
IP address configured.
Yes, i think so, too and i have carp device configured ip aadress.
To present my case more clearly here is my little experiment.
CASE ONE, dhcpd is bound to physical
Oops, i forgot to Cc the list!
Imre Oolberg wrote:
Hi!
(private) HKS wrote:
Your carp interface won't be doing much for you if it doesn't have an
IP address configured.
Yes, i think so, too and i have carp device configured ip aadress.
To present my case more clearly here is my little
Hallo!
I have been using for some time now carp failover and i am very content
with it, thank you!
I run some tests and i just wanted to confirm that in order to run dhcpd
service one has to run it on a physical interface (which has ip address
configured) like
# dhcpd fxp0
and not on a
Your carp interface won't be doing much for you if it doesn't have an
IP address configured.
You should be able to run dhcpd off carp1 without any trouble, though
I can't speak from experience.
-HKS
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Imre Oolberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I have been
6 matches
Mail list logo
