We are still talking just about backup/storage. ZFS has a lot of
features and it's used for about 4 years or so in production. Hammer
FS don't have so much features and is stable for about year. btrfs
is for those who want to experiment. Some cons - OpenSolaris has
terrible dev process, but you
irrelevant advice.
br...@quigon $ man newfs_hammerfs
man: no entry for newfs_hammerfs in the manual.
br...@quigon $ man newfs_zfs
man: no entry for newfs_zfs in the manual.
* Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com [2010-02-21 16:12]:
For storage/backup you may find much more better Hammer
Hi All,
Do you believe it is not a bad idea to use ext2 as a file system for the
regular back-up (dumps) of the filesystem ?
Actually, I would like to be able to read from a simple Linux the disk that
contents the dumps - reaon why.
Are there any constraints in doing so ? May you strongly
For storage/backup you may find much more better Hammer FS or ZFS
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Do you believe it is not a bad idea to use ext2 as a file system for the
regular back-up (dumps) of the filesystem ?
Actually, I would like
Hello,
Le Dimanche 21 FC)vrier 2010 16:11:20, vous avez C)crit :
For storage/backup you may find much more better Hammer FS or ZFS
I can't find out how to make a newfs with HFS or ZFS. Are there any additional
packages to install ?
They aren't available on other platforms. As I know Hammer FS is only
on DragonflyBSD, but there is some project to use it under fuse on
Linux. ZFS is on Solaris/OpenSolaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X. There is
project to port it to Linux, but don't know about progress. On Linux
is only available
Anyway it's quite OT :-)
Here two stories
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2009-02/msg00090.html
http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/10/10/success-with-opensolaris-zfs-mysql-in-production/
We are still talking just about backup/storage. ZFS has a lot of
features and it's used for
Hello,
Thanks I will read.
My problem is that the disks will be available in RAID1 for system to dump
upon, and in case the system itself is not responsive anymore or fails to boot
for a hardware reason, I need the external hard drives to be readable by a
Linux system. But they will be mounted
On Feb 21 19:52:54, Jean-Francois wrote:
My problem is that the disks will be available in RAID1 for system to dump
upon, and in case the system itself is not responsive anymore or fails to boot
for a hardware reason, I need the external hard drives to be readable by a
Linux system.
Why?
There is no way to mount Hammer FS or ZFS in OpenBSD as I know. What's
the target you want to achieve? To have some data on RAID accessible
from both systems? Then you can use FFS or ext2 as both are of course
on OpenBSD and Linux can read FFS. Or you can share it over NFS.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010
What the heck is your business requirement? Nobody runs an OS in
prod and expects to use another OS on the same drives.
Figure out what you *NEED* rather than what you *WANT* needless
complexity is going to kill you. So's going for buzz words. I love
zfs but it isn't the right thing for
11 matches
Mail list logo
