Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

2013-12-31 Thread frantisek holop
happy bsd year -f -- sdrawkcab spelled backwards is backwards. Index: package.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/package.5,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -p -r1.12 package.5 --- package.5 29 Sep 2011 17:57:09 -

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

2013-12-29 Thread Alexander Hall
Marc Espie wrote: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote: >> frantisek holop wrote: >> >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for >> >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing >> >this simple nitpicking patch: >> > >> >-

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

2013-12-29 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote: > frantisek holop wrote: > >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for > >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing > >this simple nitpicking patch: > > > >- Note that the base distr

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

2013-12-29 Thread Alexander Hall
frantisek holop wrote: >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing >this simple nitpicking patch: > >- Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. >baseXXX.tgz, >- compXXX.tgz, ...) are

baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

2013-12-29 Thread frantisek holop
as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing this simple nitpicking patch: - Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. baseXXX.tgz, - compXXX.tgz, ...) are not binary packages fit for pk