red filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network
performance on OpenBSD 6.4
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
That doesn't answer the question: if you say
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100
what transfer rate is reported
totally agree, Anatoli could you please comp
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> That doesn't answer the question: if you say
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100
> what transfer rate is reported
>
totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
> That number represents the maximum possible long-term
On 04/08/19 19:29, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test?
SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate
is near the top.
Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere.
He's
On 04/08/19 17:46, Anatoli wrote:
That was with Samsung 960 EVO U.2 (PCIe) on i7-8550u with 32GB RAM.
OpenBSD read/write was around 220-240MB/s (with FS encryption), Linux
without FS cache about 2.6-2.8GB/s and with cache over 3.5GB/s.
I don't have a dmesg right now as I installed Gentoo
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
>
> What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test?
> SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate
> is near the top.
>
> Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere.
>
He's using NVMe with its own DRAM
5 matches
Mail list logo