patrick keshishian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
Lars Nooden wrote:
I don't need it currently.
I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
net4801
Lars Nooden wrote:
I don't need it currently.
I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
net4801 boxes that ran (mostly) only dhcpd + pf + ftp via inetd
YMMV
Seriously, how much time did you gain
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
Lars Nooden wrote:
I don't need it currently.
I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
net4801 boxes that ran (mostly)
patrick keshishian wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
Lars Nooden wrote:
I don't need it currently.
I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
net4801
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:46:07PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
Seriously, how much time did you gain every reboot? 15 secs? And how
often did you really reboot those boxes? Frequent power outages?
I'm certainly not defending the use-case for this program/script, but,
15 seconds per
Some day you plug in your latest USB-powered dildo and it doesn't
work (because dmassage disabled it), and you're scratching your
head (or other hairy body parts) about why it doesn't work.
Your logic seems to imply heads are hairy. This is not necessarily the
case, especially when your
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:29:43PM +0200, Lars Nooden wrote:
| Think modded 'switch' or 'router' instead. The idea is that if I plug
| in an appliance, whether at the start of the day or when I moved in the
| lab or to another lab or when I swap CF cards[1], by the time I can get
| my hand over
But it's in the name!!
On Dec 30, 2009, at 14:28, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:46:07PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
Seriously, how much time did you gain every reboot? 15 secs? And how
often did you really reboot those boxes? Frequent power
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm certainly not defending the use-case for this program/script, but,
15 seconds per boot is quite a bit of time. Don't think servers,
think laptops. If one powers on/off their laptop two times a day,
ignoring
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:46:07PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
Seriously, how much time did you gain every reboot? 15 secs? And how
often did you really reboot those boxes? Frequent power outages?
I'm
Maybe that's a hint to not use kernel modifying tools that do things
that are unexpected.
On Dec 26, 2009, at 13:35, Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com wrote:
When I run dmassage, the resulting modifications prevent using raid.
dmassage -f /bsd | config -e -o /nbsd /bsd
If I
I don't need it currently.
I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
net4801 boxes that ran (mostly) only dhcpd + pf + ftp via inetd
YMMV
Now I wanted to see if it worked with a more complex set up.
When I run dmassage, the resulting modifications prevent using raid.
dmassage -f /bsd | config -e -o /nbsd /bsd
If I understand correctly, the softraid device is showing in the dmesg,
so it shouldn't get removed by dmassage.
excerpt from diff of dmesg's after dmassage and before
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com wrote:
When I run dmassage, the resulting modifications prevent using raid.
dmassage -f /bsd | config -e -o /nbsd /bsd
If I understand correctly, the softraid device is showing in the dmesg, so
it shouldn't get removed
What;s the point of use of this app?
Of course that I read this http://www.sentia.org/projects/dmassage/ ,
but is it really so faster after that? I haven't problem with speed of
boot in OpenBSD. It's quite similar as in Ubuntu and kernel size is
7.2MB. Page says that last version is from 2002. A
15 matches
Mail list logo
