Am Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:19:24 -0500 schrieb Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
James Hartley wrote:
On 6/30/07, *Aaron* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the
misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another
question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am
making an assumption here that people would want to update code when
needed, and be supported, why even give the
On Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 21:54:00 -0500, Aaron wrote:
That sounds good, and i read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade41.html
about upgrading, and http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release
When following stable with the method described in the faq, i didn't
notice anything about final
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping
it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i
installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through
the following stable
Aaron wrote:
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping
it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i
installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through
the
James Hartley wrote:
On 6/30/07, *Aaron* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the
misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
The following link from the FAQ
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
The following link from the FAQ describes what the roles of each file set.
Perhaps this will provide
Firas Kraiem wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone.
I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for
keeping it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for
me. When i installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41.
I
On Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 15:13:31 -0500, Aaron wrote:
What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and
game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound
correct?
Yes, that's the way make build works. It compiles and installs
everything in the source
Maurice Janssen writes:
Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of
following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no
use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as
possible.
I'm sure it's possible to modify the tree in
Marco S Hyman wrote:
Maurice Janssen writes:
Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of
following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no
use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as
possible.
I'm sure it's possible to
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another
question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am
making an assumption here that people would want to update code when
needed, and be supported, why even give the
David Higgs wrote:
On 6/30/07, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another
question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am
making an assumption here that people would want to update code when
needed, and be
13 matches
Mail list logo
