Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-16 Thread Zoran Kolic
namely an implementation of the stuff that makes it possible to go fullscreen and back. I remade .fvwmrc and set this to do what you wanted: Key F9 A M Maximize 100 100 There is a lot options to change and make fvwm just perfect. This takes the shell as an input and fullscreens it and, with

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread James Griffin
* Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]: On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes: In fact, fvwm is in base part. A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about relicensing fvwm to

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net writes: * Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]: On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes: In fact, fvwm is in base part. A while ago, there was a message to misc from

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread Thomas Adam
Hi, On 15 September 2013 11:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net writes: * Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]: On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes:

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:12:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: Hi, On 15 September 2013 11:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net writes: * Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org [2013-09-12 10:17:56 +0100]: On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:12:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: Hi, On 15 September 2013 11:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net writes: * Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-15 Thread Thomas Adam
Marc, On 15 September 2013 21:34, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:12:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: Hi, On 15 September 2013 11:48, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net writes: * Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-12 Thread James Griffin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:10:36AM -0500, Carson Chittom wrote: Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes: In fact, fvwm is in base part. A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if there is any

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-12 Thread Thomas Adam
On 12 September 2013 06:10, Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes: In fact, fvwm is in base part. A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if there is any

Re: fvwm in base [was: X -configure segmentation fault]

2013-09-11 Thread Carson Chittom
Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs writes: In fact, fvwm is in base part. A while ago, there was a message to misc from the fvwm developer about relicensing fvwm to allow a more recent version into base. I wonder if there is any status update?