Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-14 Thread Артур Истомин
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:10:09PM -0500, John Smith wrote: I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@ stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to OpenBSD standards. That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than a day or so, but

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-14 Thread Kevin Chadwick
previously on this list Артур Истомин contributed: I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@ stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to OpenBSD standards. That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than a day or so,

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-12 Thread John Smith
I think pop3 is dead but recently there was a mail in tech@ stating Sunil Nimmagadda develops pop3 daemon closed to OpenBSD standards. That's a good point. I don't like leaving mails on the server for more than a day or so, but I don't see why I can't emulate this behavior on IMAP. I had

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-01-05, John Smith jpmar...@outlook.com wrote: What would people recommend for a simple replacement for SSL pop3? I feel like the general consensus will be switch to popa3d in ports, popa3d is not currently in ports.

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-06 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2014-01-04 Sat 21:04 PM |, John Smith wrote: What would people recommend for a simple replacement for SSL pop3? I use dovecot for IMAP only (no POP). It can do SSL authenticate against the /etc password arrangement. Cheers, -- Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner |

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-06 Thread Jiri B
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:04:27PM -0500, John Smith wrote: I'm a fan of simple setups and try to stick with the base programs if possible. I've been using an SSL relayd wrapper around popa3d for a simple and base-supported mail setup with opensmtpd. What would people recommend for a simple

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-05 Thread Peter Hessler
dovecot is pretty much the only sane option for pop3 and imap servers these days. On 2014 Jan 04 (Sat) at 21:04:27 -0500 (-0500), John Smith wrote: :I'm a fan of simple setups and try to stick with the base programs if :possible. I've been using an SSL relayd wrapper around popa3d for a simple

Re: popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-05 Thread Артур Истомин
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: dovecot is pretty much the only sane option for pop3 and imap servers these days. On 2014 Jan 04 (Sat) at 21:04:27 -0500 (-0500), John Smith wrote: :I'm a fan of simple setups and try to stick with the base programs if

popa3d removed from base - what do people recommend?

2014-01-04 Thread John Smith
I'm a fan of simple setups and try to stick with the base programs if possible. I've been using an SSL relayd wrapper around popa3d for a simple and base-supported mail setup with opensmtpd. What would people recommend for a simple replacement for SSL pop3? I feel like the general consensus will