Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-18 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: models which should work. One notable exception is the DWL-G520+ card, which is based on Intel's super-secret acx111 chip. The chipset is actually by TI (Texas Instruments), not Intel. Thanks for the correction, I'll make a note of it. I really do not want to

Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-12 Thread Brad
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:20:24PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nevermind that almost working comment, if I walk more than 15 feet away from the base station the signal goes from 75 to 0. Time to dump this cheap card. Does anyone know if ath

Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-12 Thread Theo de Raadt
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:20:24PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nevermind that almost working comment, if I walk more than 15 feet away from the base station the signal goes from 75 to 0. Time to dump this cheap card. Does anyone know

Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-11 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nevermind that almost working comment, if I walk more than 15 feet away from the base station the signal goes from 75 to 0. Time to dump this cheap card. Does anyone know if ath works well with a pci 2.1? Yes, I've got an ath based card (a D-Link

Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-09 Thread Matt Brenneke
Just thought I'd give an update on this thread for the archives, and see if anyone has an idea how to fix my WEP problem. I pulled out a new(er) p3-500 to replace the p-233 that I started this thread with. It still reports as pci 2.1, but the card works in hostap mode in this machine, mostly.

Re: ral0 problem

2005-07-09 Thread Matt Brenneke
Nevermind that almost working comment, if I walk more than 15 feet away from the base station the signal goes from 75 to 0. Time to dump this cheap card. Does anyone know if ath works well with a pci 2.1? -Matt Brenneke On 7/9/05, Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just thought I'd give

Re: ral0 problem

2005-06-21 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xbf58 That's your problem, right there. ral(4) needs PCI 2.2. Easy to miss, but it does say so in the man page, under CAVEATS. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team

Re: ral0 problem

2005-06-21 Thread Matt Brenneke
On 6/21/05, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xbf58 That's your problem, right there. ral(4) needs PCI 2.2. Easy to miss, but it does say so in the man page, under CAVEATS. I had read that

Re: ral0 problem

2005-06-21 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Matt Brenneke wrote: | On 6/21/05, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Matt Brenneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xbf58 | | That's your problem, right there. ral(4) needs PCI 2.2. | | Easy to miss,

ral0 problem

2005-06-20 Thread Matt Brenneke
With the upgrade to OpenBSD 3.7, I decided it was time to upgrade from 802.11b to 802.11g. I went out and bought a linksys card (Ralink RT2560 based). I pulled out my old wi0 card and put in the ral0 card, updated my pf rules and hostname.if file, and tried to connect, but KisMAC and iStumbler