Re: ospfd default route problem

Hi stuart, i agree, but that means i must use area 0 on LAN ifaces. And if i have another area on that iface (my extented LAN area), i can't use backbone area. Now, i have replaced area 12 with area 0, but the problem also persists. -- Best regards, Loïc BLOT, Engineering UNIX Systems, Security

ospfd default route problem

Hi all, I update my last mail with OSPF to give you precisions. I have 2 LAN OBSD routers, which are on a local VLAN, and 1 MAN OBSD router, connected to local VLAN and has an interco with MAN Router - my 3 OpenBSD routers use area 12 to exchange local routes - my MAN router use area 12 over

Re: ospfd default route problem

Hi Robert and misc@openbsd, thanks for your reply, but if i don't want to connect area 12 on area 0 ? My area 12 is reserved for LAN to LAN only, i don't want to publish its routes on the backbone area and backbone area is not in stub mode. Also, I thought about stub areas to not publish routes.

Re: ospfd default route problem

On 2013-03-25, Loïc BLOT loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote: Hi Robert and misc@openbsd, thanks for your reply, but if i don't want to connect area 12 on area 0 ? My area 12 is reserved for LAN to LAN only, i don't want to publish its routes on the backbone area and backbone area is not in

OSPF and default route problem

Hello misc, i am installing a WAN router under openbsd but i have a strange problem with OSPF and OpenBSD. I use two OSPF areas. One area is stub and the other isn't (and i have tryied to stub it too). We can say area 1 is stub area and area 5 is LAN area. When the router learn routes from area 1

RES: Route problem

Para: misc@openbsd.org Assunto: Route problem HI, I use na OpenBSD 4.3 as gw + firewall. I also have a Mikrotik as a backup gateway. Now I lost the connectivity of one of my links . ( router 10.100.0.1 is down ) From mikrotik i AM able to reach the target network ( 10.100.0.0/24 ) So I removed

Route problem

HI, I use na OpenBSD 4.3 as gw + firewall. I also have a Mikrotik as a backup gateway. Now I lost the connectivity of one of my links . ( router 10.100.0.1 is down ) From mikrotik i AM able to reach the target network ( 10.100.0.0/24 ) So I removed this route from OpenBSD and added new route to

Re: RES: Route problem

anyone help me? _ De: Ricardo Augusto de Souza Enviada em: terga-feira, 7 de julho de 2009 10:45 Para: misc@openbsd.org Assunto: Route problem HI, I use na OpenBSD 4.3 as gw + firewall. I also have a Mikrotik as a backup gateway. Now I lost

Re: Carp with aliases route problem

On 2009-02-24, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:52:33 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote: As a corrilary, for those ISP's who think there is only need for a single /30 for a client's router, the concept of failover routers means 1 physical IP per router, and 1 IP for the

Re: Carp with aliases route problem

I suspect you might want /32 on the carp interfaces (255.255.255.255 rather than your 255.255.255.224). What are the exact symptoms of not being able to reach .197 when HostB is in backup state? It may be stating the obvious but check there's no PF rule that might be blocking it. You don't

Re: Carp with aliases route problem

On 21:31, Mon 23 Feb 09, Stuart Henderson wrote: I suspect you might want /32 on the carp interfaces (255.255.255.255 rather than your 255.255.255.224). I'll try that in the next week. Thanks for the pointer. What are the exact symptoms of not being able to reach .197 when HostB is in

Re: Carp with aliases route problem

You cannot get internet access on a backup carp interface, period. I have seen what you see before, and it comes from not starting things up in proper order manually, i.e. configuring a system, and not rebooting it after it was configured so that boot time configs get processed in proper order.

Re: Carp with aliases route problem

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:52:33 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote: As a corrilary, for those ISP's who think there is only need for a single /30 for a client's router, the concept of failover routers means 1 physical IP per router, and 1 IP for the failover IP, aka 3 IP's for the client side, dictating a

Carp with aliases route problem

Hi all, I'm having some trouble with a two-node CARP setup. Configuration: HostA /etc/hostname.em0 inet XXX.XXX.XXX.196 255.255.255.244 XXX.XXX.XXX.223 \ media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex description External /etc/hostname.em1 inet 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.255 \

route problem

Hello, I have a route problem in setting up my home network. Here is the layout of it: internet | obsd3.6 (fw) | 192.168.1.254 | switch (wired) | | 192.168.1.230 (vr0 wired) | obsd-3.8 | | 192.168.2.1 (ral0 wireless) | clients (Xp) My problem is: the XP can ssh

Re: route problem

man Chan wrote: Hello, I have a route problem in setting up my home network. Here is the layout of it: internet | obsd3.6 (fw) | 192.168.1.254 | switch (wired) | | 192.168.1.230 (vr0 wired) | obsd-3.8 | | 192.168.2.1 (ral0 wireless) | clients (Xp) My problem

Re: route problem

On 10/15/05, man Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a route problem in setting up my home network. Here is the layout of it: internet | obsd3.6 (fw) | 192.168.1.254 http://192.168.1.254 | switch (wired) | | 192.168.1.230 http://192.168.1.230 (vr0 wired) | obsd-3.8

Re: route problem

On 10/15/05, Marcus Lindemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: man Chan wrote: Hello, I have a route problem in setting up my home network. Here is the layout of it: internet | obsd3.6 (fw) | 192.168.1.254 http://192.168.1.254 | switch (wired) | | 192.168.1.230 http://192.168.1.230

回覆： Re: route problem

--- Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;!!G On 10/15/05, man Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a route problem in setting up my home network. Here is the layout of it: internet | obsd3.6 (fw) | 192.168.1.254 http://192.168.1.254 | switch (wired