, which just keeps coming until I stop the
connection attempt:
mount_nfs: bad MNT RPC: RPC: Timed out
I have tried many variations of the mount
and all fail with the same error. Whether I use doas or as root there
is no change. mount
:
mount_nfs: bad MNT RPC: RPC: Timed out
I have tried many variations of the mount and all fail with the same error. Whether I use doas or as root there is no change.
mount host:/mnt/share /mnt/nfs
mount_nfs host:/mnt/share /mnt/nfs
how to replace nfs ?
Em qua., 20 de mar. de 2024 às 19:27, Alexis
escreveu:
> Gustavo Rios writes:
>
> >> NFS/NIS/AMD are very old technology and are not robust.
> >
> > How to replace NIS ?
>
> Perhaps an LDAP implementation, e.g. OpenLDAP?
> https://www.openldap.org/
>
>
> Alexis.
>
--
The
If the latency of the web technologies are fine, I guess someone will point out:
NextCloud
Indeed is an allroundtheclock solution.
If you need something custom, on premised, with the messaging on the top
I can also think to go over my https://homomm.5mode-foss.eu and shape its
intranet facilitie
Em qua., 20 de mar. de 2024 às 01:44, Geoff Steckel escreveu:
> On 3/20/24 00:06, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I wonder if nis/nfs/amd a good choice for sharing information and data
> > in a heterogeneous environment?
> > If not how to replace these technologies
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
Hi folks!
I wonder if nis/nfs/amd a good choice for sharing information and data in a
heterogeneous environment?
If not how to replace these technologies
Thanks a lot.
Gustavo
--
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolves do not perform
in the circus
to contact the tftp/dhcp server and
> > download the bsd kernel and boot up
> > However, just before (or while) mounting nfs shares as root I get the
> > RPC
> > timeout error.
> >
> > ```
> > nfs_boot: using interface bse0 with revarp & bootparams
> >
I have configured "/etc/dnsmasq", "/etc/ethers", "/etc/hosts", and
"/etc/exports" and "/etc/bootparams".
The PXE boot in UEFI boot is able to contact the tftp/dhcp server and
download the bsd kernel and boot up
However, just before (or while) m
UEFI boot is able to contact the tftp/dhcp server and
download the bsd kernel and boot up
However, just before (or while) mounting nfs shares as root I get the RPC
timeout error.
```
nfs_boot: using interface bse0 with revarp & bootparams
RPC timeout for server 192.168.0.255
```
In an
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:12:29AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I am writing a program to query my portmap server.
> I am using the getport routine. The parameters i am using is
>
> program = 10
> version = 3
> protocol = 17
>
> And it returns the port 111.
>
> But when i change version
I am writing a program to query my portmap server.
I am using the getport routine. The parameters i am using is
program = 10
version = 3
protocol = 17
And it returns the port 111.
But when i change version from 3 to, say, 10
It stills returns port 111.
Should not it return another value
Hi everyone
TL,DR: pf between NFS server and clients - how to let the appropriate
traffic pass?
My NFS server and its clients live on different subnets, with a box
doing the routing and the filtering in between. Since I'm filtering
traffic between subnets and both mountd and nlockmgr get random p
; > running, and showmount shows an export but on the client when I get to the
> > > line in the faq
> > >
> > > # mount -t nfs 10.0.0.1:/work /mnt
> > >
> > > and adapt it to the setup I have here I get the message
> > >
> > > RP
the faq
# mount -t nfs 10.0.0.1:/work /mnt
and adapt it to the setup I have here I get the message
RPC: Program not registered
I did a bit of searching but couldnb t find anything for OpenBSD about
this.
Everything else in the faq has worked fine.
What am I doing wrong?
You need to start
; line in the faq
> >
> > # mount -t nfs 10.0.0.1:/work /mnt
> >
> > and adapt it to the setup I have here I get the message
> >
> > RPC: Program not registered
> >
> >
> > I did a bit of searching but couldnb t find anything for OpenBSD
message
RPC: Program not registered
I did a bit of searching but couldnbt find anything for OpenBSD about this.
Everything else in the faq has worked fine.
What am I doing wrong?
Giridhari
.
try mount without "-t nfs"
also be sure /mnt is created on clinet
also try "sudo mount"
t;
> and adapt it to the setup I have here I get the message
>
> RPC: Program not registered
>
>
> I did a bit of searching but couldnb t find anything for OpenBSD about
this.
> Everything else in the faq has worked fine.
> What am I doing wrong?
You need to start portmap on the clients
HELO.
I am following http://openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#NFS and have the server
running, and showmount shows an export but on the client when I get to the
line in the faq
# mount -t nfs 10.0.0.1:/work /mnt
and adapt it to the setup I have here I get the message
RPC: Program not registered
I
> I'm trying to set up my server for diskless boots, as described
> in the diskless(8) manpage (at the moment, more or less mostly as
> an academic exercise, but I was planning to take my oldish
> laptops to some use this way).
[...]
> I have already tried to have tcpdump have a look at what's go
I just happened to run into the same issue right after upgrading to 4.7
(however, you mention 4.6, so I'm uncertain we're dealing with the same
cause).
Basically, the issue I'm seeing is that portmap/rpc.bootparamd don't see
the incoming packets for 172.16.255.255 (my own network being
172.16.5.0/
* Fred Crowson on Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43:09PM +0100:
> What does your dhcpd.conf look like on your server?
I have several subnets served via DHCP, so I have reported only
the relevant one together with the global options:
| server-name "Neu-Sorpigal";
| option domain-name "intranet.aleturo.co
etup
> only rarpd and nfs.
>
> However, when I now try to get the client actually to boot from
> this setup, it fails quite miserably when trying to mount the
> root filesystem via NFS. The kernel just hangs forever, printing
> "RPC timeout for server 172.23.255.255 (0xac17)
quite miserably when trying to mount the
root filesystem via NFS. The kernel just hangs forever, printing
"RPC timeout for server 172.23.255.255 (0xac17) prog 10".
After some research, I came up with an old posting from misc
(http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-01/
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, James Mackinnon wrote:
Good day everyone
Recently, I installed SP1 on some domain controllers and ran into an issue
where microsoft changed rpc data with SP1 and firewalls such as microsofts own
ISA server as well as checkpoint have started to randomly block this data
Good day everyone
Recently, I installed SP1 on some domain controllers and ran into an issue
where microsoft changed rpc data with SP1 and firewalls such as microsofts own
ISA server as well as checkpoint have started to randomly block this data.
They have both offered up a fix for the issue, but
Hello!
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:21:06PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
>Dear folks,
>i have choosen openbsd as my plataform of choice for deploying a
>service that will have to handle RPC processing in an asynchronous
>fashion. I got surprised when i see that the RPC library that
Dear folks,
i have choosen openbsd as my plataform of choice for deploying a
service that will have to handle RPC processing in an asynchronous
fashion. I got surprised when i see that the RPC library that comes
with OpenBSD does not support Async processing. I tried to build my
own routine and
Thanks Stephen.
On 7/27/05, Stephen Marley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:55:51AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to
> > the standard implementation code of rpc.
> >
> > I do
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:55:51AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to
> the standard implementation code of rpc.
>
> I don't feel like considering (as you self said) garbage like corba,
> rx, rxml-rpc
>
>
Do you have any other suggestions where i could download alternatives for rpc?
corba, rx, xml-rpc
they all suck, just in different ways.
/ian
I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to
the standard implementation code of rpc.
I don't feel like considering (as you self said) garbage like corba,
rx, rxml-rpc
I am considering rpc/xdr but a different code implementation.
Thanks for your reply.
On 7/
> 0) Functions return 1 for success and 0 for failure (i don't like that);
Surely thats too trivial to hold a preference to? Most languages do it
this way though.
0 for failure (i don't like that);
1) too many function call between the caller and the real funcionality;
2) function names are to big.
Do you have any other suggestions where i could download alternatives for rpc?
thanks.
On 27 Jul 2005 07:51:52 +0200, Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey folks,
>
> i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to
> read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy,
> cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller
>
Hey folks,
i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to
read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy,
cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller
and the "real" function that do the job.
So, i wonder if anybod
35 matches
Mail list logo
