wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded my OpenBSD-based mail server to:
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #187: Sat Dec 28 17:15:20 MST 2013
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
and I cannot figure out where is the problem in my smtpd config:
# /etc
figure out where is the problem in my smtpd config:
# /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
ext_if = re0
max-message-size 35m
bounce-warn 4h, 1d, 2d
expire 7d
pki openbsd.my.domain ca /etc/ssl/cert.pem
pki openbsd.my.domain key /etc/mail/certs/smtpd.key
pki openbsd.my.domain dhparams /etc/mail
Hi,
I've just upgraded my OpenBSD-based mail server to:
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #187: Sat Dec 28 17:15:20 MST 2013
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
and I cannot figure out where is the problem in my smtpd config:
# /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
ext_if
On Dec 17 08:35:28, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
I am using smtpd as my mail server on a network
where the relay server often replies with
4.5.3 Too many recipients
Indeed, I was sending messages with a lot of recipients
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:17:27AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 17 08:35:28, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
I am using smtpd as my mail server on a network
where the relay server often replies with
4.5.3 Too many recipients
On Dec 17 09:21:58, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:17:27AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Dec 17 08:35:28, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
I am using smtpd as my mail server on a network
where the relay server often
The relay disabling code has been removed,
Disabling the relay which does not accept me
seems pretty neat actually - if I do have
another route through another relay :-)
Jan,
Sorry, but I do not see what your problem is?
If you need to send an email to a group of people that's significantly bigger
allowed on your relay, why don't you just try to implement a very simple
script, that will send your mail to one recipient at a time.
--
With best regards,
On 12/17/2013 5:37 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
That's the relay which is rejecting my messages
if there are too many recipients in them.
I deleted all the failed ones from my queue
and after some time, resent to the individual recipients (~120)
one by one with a bit of grepawkery; that went fine.
On 12/17/2013 03:32 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
On 12/17/2013 5:37 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
That's the relay which is rejecting my messages
if there are too many recipients in them.
I deleted all the failed ones from my queue
and after some time, resent to the individual recipients (~120)
one by
On Dec 17 14:53:59, ediga...@qarea.com wrote:
Jan,
Sorry, but I do not see what your problem is?
If you need to send an email to a group of people that's significantly bigger
allowed on your relay, why don't you just try to implement a very simple
script, that will send your mail to one
I am using smtpd as my mail server on a network
where the relay server often replies with
4.5.3 Too many recipients
Indeed, I was sending messages with a lot of recipients
(a group of students).
Is there a way in the smtpd configuration
to specify that a message with N recipients
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
I am using smtpd as my mail server on a network
where the relay server often replies with
4.5.3 Too many recipients
Indeed, I was sending messages with a lot of recipients
(a group of students).
Is there a way
pass in log on egress proto tcp from spamd-white to any port smtp
pass out log on egress proto tcp to any port smtp
Here, spamd is listening on 127.0.0.1, and smtpd is (presumably) listening on
any interface. Is there a problem with only allowing smtpd to listen on
127.0.0.1 as well
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
I just needed to do the same (smtpd would elect to use ipv6, but i only
have ipv4 spf records). The man page kind of says it's a table name, but
it's not. Try this instead:
accept from local for any relay source a.b.c.d
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 13:53, Chris Smith wrote:
Using these rules does not:
pf: pass out quick on $alias1 proto tcp from self to any port smtp
smtpd: table smtpip { w.x.y.z }
smtpd: accept from local for any relay source smtpip
I just needed to do the same (smtpd would elect to use ipv6
via a workaround - I installed Postfix as the MTA.
Always liked it, never liked Sendmail. Was willing to give SMTPD a go,
but for now I needed a working box.
Chris
Hello,
Trying to use smtpd on a particular interface alias (for sending only,
not for listening) and am not finding a way to do so. It seems to
default sending out via the :0 address.
Chris
Em 25-11-2013 15:18, Chris Smith escreveu:
Hello,
Trying to use smtpd on a particular interface alias (for sending only,
not for listening) and am not finding a way to do so. It seems to
default sending out via the :0 address.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Taking a look on the smtpd.conf(5) man
fine for the :0 address:
pf: pass out quick on $ext_if proto tcp from self to any port smtp
smtpd: accept from local for any relay
Using these rules does not:
pf: pass out quick on $alias1 proto tcp from self to any port smtp
smtpd: table smtpip { w.x.y.z }
smtpd: accept from local for any relay
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Christopher Zimmermann
christop...@gmerlin.de wrote:
Now I'd be looking at 'route -n show -inet', 'ifconfig $ext_if' and
'ifconfig $alias1'
ifconfig doesn't understand pf macros (as far as i can tell)
==
# route
Hello,
My idea is quite simple - I have list of IP addresses that are only
sending spam and I need to collect that spam, instead of rejecting it,
so that I can report it to authorities.
I've been thinking about using OpenBSD SMTPD for this task, but can't
figure out how to do that.
PF has
deliver to maildir /var/spamdb
# /usr/sbin/smtpd
/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:17: syntax error
warn: no rules, nothing to do
Line 17th is accept rule in smtpd.conf file.
By the way, I'm doing this on OpenBSD 5.3.
Thanks,
Karlis
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:10:53PM +0300, K�?rlis Miķelsons wrote:
listen on lo0 port 9025
accept from any for any deliver to maildir /var/spamdb
# /usr/sbin/smtpd
/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:17: syntax error
warn: no rules, nothing to do
try putting the path in quotes:
accept from any
# /usr/sbin/smtpd
/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:17: syntax error
warn: no rules, nothing to do
try putting the path in quotes:
accept from any for any deliver to maildir /var/spamdb
Thank you, Reyk, that fixed the problem!
Is there a way to create catchall aliases or virtuals so that SMTPD
would
Is there a way to create catchall aliases or virtuals so that SMTPD
would receive email for all domains and all user accounts? I've been
trying different combinations of alias and virtual databases, but
nothing seems to work.
To answer my own question:
# cat /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
listen on lo0
).
So when you specify 'mx' as a parameter for the 'backup' keyword,
what does that mean precisely? A DNS server host name? A preference
value?
When I see MX, I think of the MX records in the DNS zone file. I
tried using a preference value, and that was rejected by smtpd as
invalid
I'm having difficulties configuring smtpd as a backup mail server. smtpd
is running on my main mail server and works a treat. (Good riddance,
sendmail.)
I've read the man pages and understood them the best I can, and tried
various configuration options, all to no avail. Mails to known valid
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:54:55AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
I'm having difficulties configuring smtpd as a backup mail server.
smtpd is running on my main mail server and works a treat. (Good
riddance, sendmail.)
I've read the man pages and understood them the best I can, and
tried
file. I tried
using a preference value, and that was rejected by smtpd as invalid.
? A preference
value?
When I see MX, I think of the MX records in the DNS zone file. I
tried using a preference value, and that was rejected by smtpd as
invalid.
If the backup parameter is specified, the current server
will act as a backup server for the target
,
what does that mean precisely? A DNS server host name? A preference
value?
When I see MX, I think of the MX records in the DNS zone file. I
tried using a preference value, and that was rejected by smtpd as
invalid.
If the backup parameter is specified, the current server
Hi William,
I would suggest trying these things first:
- have you checked smtpd main page to Modify the current mailwrapper(8)
settings?
- stop smtpd and run it in foreground smtpd -d -v, so all the info will go
to stderr
- try to exclude dovecot and check that smtpd can deliver messages
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:33:51PM -0700, William Orr wrote:
Thanks Gilles, first for the help and second for the fantastic software.
One last question - is there a way I can resend the mail stuck in
the queue? I've tried smtpctl schedule all, but it doesn't seem to
resolve the aliases,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:44:02PM -0700, William Orr wrote:
Hello, all!
Hello,
I'm having some problems with aliases in smtpd, in that they're not
properly resolving. I have a bunch of incoming mails stuck in the
queue that dovecot (my MDA) refuses to deliver. The logs don't point
to any
Is that available in OpenBSD 5.3? I saw that in the -current manpage
when I was originally configuring smtpd, but lmtp delivery wasn't in the
manpage in 5.3.
Gilles Chehade mailto:gil...@poolp.org
June 18, 2013 1:00 AM
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:44:02PM -0700, William Orr wrote:
Hello, all
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:10:25AM -0700, William Orr wrote:
Is that available in OpenBSD 5.3? I saw that in the -current manpage
when I was originally configuring smtpd, but lmtp delivery wasn't in
the manpage in 5.3.
Nope, not part of OpenBSD 5.3
But you can fetch a 5.3.3 stable tarball
when I was originally configuring smtpd, but lmtp delivery wasn't in
the manpage in 5.3.
Gilles Chehade mailto:gil...@poolp.org
June 18, 2013 1:00 AM
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 04:44:02PM -0700, William Orr wrote:
Hello, all!
Hello,
I'm having some problems with aliases in smtpd, in that they're
Hello, all!
I'm having some problems with aliases in smtpd, in that they're not
properly resolving. I have a bunch of incoming mails stuck in the queue
that dovecot (my MDA) refuses to deliver. The logs don't point to any
problem reading or opening the aliases file.
Here is my smtpd.conf
Hi,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:49:20PM -0700, Scott wrote:
To relay to gmail, I added the following to smtpd.conf:
table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db
accept for any relay via tls+auth://gmail1atsmtp.gmail.com:587 \
auth secrets
And created secrets and ran makemap. secrets contains:
Thanks for chiming in Gilles.
It's ironic that because of trying to minimize noise to the list, I create
more. The rest of the conf is at the beginning of the thread, but I'll be
sure to include entire outputs in the future; sorry.
Anyway, it wasn't my conf. Your comment about my MX question got
To relay to gmail, I added the following to smtpd.conf:
table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db
accept for any relay via tls+auth://gmail1atsmtp.gmail.com:587 \
auth secrets
And created secrets and ran makemap. secrets contains:
gmail1 useridatgmail.com:mypassword
These settings are
Eric:
Thanks again for your help; it's working again.
All:
While I've got the patience to work up to my final desired configuration
for smtpd, I don't know if any of the rest of you do :)
I'd like to write a section for mail setup in the FAQ. Whether it actually
gets included
for
explanations of 421 on the web.
# cat /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
listen on lo0
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
accept for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept for any relay
# echo 'test' | mail -s TEST scott
send-mail: command failed: 421 Temporary failure
smtpd -d -T smtp output:
info
wondered if somehow I gummed up my queue when I was diddling around with
the relay settings.
# ls /var/spool/smtpd/
a0
Ok, so that's my just-failed message, so I flush it, just to be sanitary:
# smtpctl remove a0b31f71a4e509ff
(BTW, is there a way to flush ALL queued messages? smtpctl(8
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:23:35PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Greetings all,
I was excited to try out smtpd because of future plans to go away from
webmail. Right after installing 5.3 I followed the directions in man smtpd
to make the switch. smtpd.conf is untouched, but here are the values anyway
On Tue 2013.05.07 at 17:23 -0700, Scott wrote:
Greetings all,
I was excited to try out smtpd because of future plans to go away from
webmail. Right after installing 5.3 I followed the directions in man smtpd
to make the switch. smtpd.conf is untouched, but here are the values anyway
Okan,
My .forward is empty right now, but thanks for trying to help.
Eric,
Thank you very much for the tip. I thought all of my conf files had taken
care of domain naming, but somehow my ISPs domain name was still slipping
through as shown when running smtpd -d -T smtp.
I thought supersede
Greetings all,
I was excited to try out smtpd because of future plans to go away from
webmail. Right after installing 5.3 I followed the directions in man smtpd
to make the switch. smtpd.conf is untouched, but here are the values anyway:
listen on lo0
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
accept
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:07:47PM +0200, Michael wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
sorry for the delay, i'm struggling to catch up on my mailbox ...
smtpd doesn't support address rewriting at the moment.
It will either use the local `hostname` or the one supplied by your MUA.
While I knew it didn't
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:20:21PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
The smtpd(8) manpage documents the steps needed
to replace the default sendmail with smtpd.
However, it does not mention the
sendmail clientmqueue runner cronjob.
That should probably be edited from
the root's cronjob, right
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Michael wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I noticed some weird behavior regarding the From: header when
using smtpd under some circumstances, not sure if this is a bug.
[...]
The problem:
Mails generated on server 2 (some.thing.example.com) from /etc/daily
On 04/11/13 21:33, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Michael wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I noticed some weird behavior regarding the From: header when
using smtpd under some circumstances, not sure if this is a bug.
[...]
The problem:
Mails generated on server 2
On 04/11/13 22:27, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 04/11/13 21:33, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Michael wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I noticed some weird behavior regarding the From: header when
using smtpd under some circumstances, not sure if this is a bug
Hi,
smtpd doesn't support address rewriting at the moment.
It will either use the local `hostname` or the one supplied by your MUA.
While I knew it didn't rewrite stuff, looking at it this way, it sure
can cause... interesting times.
E.g. meaning if you mail out stuff with a plain From
On 04/11/13 23:07, Michael wrote:
Hi,
smtpd doesn't support address rewriting at the moment.
It will either use the local `hostname` or the one supplied by your MUA.
While I knew it didn't rewrite stuff, looking at it this way, it sure
can cause... interesting times.
E.g. meaning if you
Hi,
I noticed some weird behavior regarding the From: header when using
smtpd under some circumstances, not sure if this is a bug.
The setup:
1.) Main mail server with sendmail hostname mail.domain.tld and
local-host-names containing domain example.com.
2.) A second server with hostname
The smtpd(8) manpage documents the steps needed
to replace the default sendmail with smtpd.
However, it does not mention the
sendmail clientmqueue runner cronjob.
That should probably be edited from
the root's cronjob, right?
Jan
Changed mta to opensmtpd. Default smtpd.conf file works
for home node. I tried to add relay option to send mail
via my ISP smtp server and smtpd refused to load and
parse the file. The line in question is:
accept for any relay via my.isp.smtpserver
What exact syntax should I use? Current, amd64
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Changed mta to opensmtpd. Default smtpd.conf file works
for home node. I tried to add relay option to send mail
via my ISP smtp server and smtpd refused to load and
parse the file. The line in question is:
accept for any
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
accept for any relay via my.isp.smtpserver
iirc, smtpd.conf(5) mentions the host being in URL form, e.g.
smtp://my.isp.smtpserver
At least, it does for my Feb 17th snapshot.
Regards,
Rogier
listen on lo0
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
accept for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept for any relay via smtp.sbb.rs
The error message is:
/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:16: error: invalid url: smtp.sbb.rs
If needed, I will provide further info.
Zoran
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:57:26PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
listen on lo0
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
accept for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept for any relay via smtp.sbb.rs
The error message is:
/etc/mail/smtpd.conf:16: error: invalid url: smtp.sbb.rs
If
Smtpd loaded with smtp:// prefix. Thanks.
Another problem surfaced: I added line to
muttrc to have smtpd as a mailer:
set sendmail=/usr/sbin/smtpctl
and I cannot send mail, since smtpctl needs
root privilages. Am I on the correct path for
this?
Zoran
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:11:54PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Smtpd loaded with smtp:// prefix. Thanks.
Another problem surfaced: I added line to
muttrc to have smtpd as a mailer:
set sendmail=/usr/sbin/smtpctl
and I cannot send mail, since smtpctl needs
root privilages. Am I
Ah! Ah! Forgot about mailwrapper!
I put /usr/sbin/sendmail and it works fine.
It is simply a link to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper.
Thanks a lot.
Zoran
One more question. Using top I learnt that smtpd
had 7 or 8 instances. Is it intentional?
Zoran
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:45:36PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
One more question. Using top I learnt that smtpd
had 7 or 8 instances. Is it intentional?
Yes, these are different processes handling different tasks.
Here's a schema I did of the layout a while ago:
http://goo.gl/73UaI
On 02/26/13 11:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Here's a schema I did of the layout a while ago:
Your diagram, with Charles, reminds me of a question I've always wondered:
What's with the name Charlie in a default install? Just curious..
--
Scott McEachern
https://www.blackstaff.ca
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 02/26/13 11:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Here's a schema I did of the layout a while ago:
Your diagram, with Charles, reminds me of a question I've always wondered:
What's with the name Charlie in a default install? Just
On Feb 26 17:11:54, zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
Another problem surfaced: I added line to
muttrc to have smtpd as a mailer:
set sendmail=/usr/sbin/smtpctl
Why?
, but in no circumstances should a
mail be accepted then fail a whole recipient list because one delivery
failed.
are you sure that's what happening ?
can you provide a smtpd -dv log while you reproduce the issue ?
How I found out about this:
in aliases(5):
foobar: b_user, a_user
(Verbose
with a nonzero status, thus disturbing smtpd,
which was the OP's problem as I understood it.)
Jan
On Apr 14 19:48:24, mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
hello (opensmtpd-) folks,
I think OpenSMTPd aborts delivery to multiple aliased recipients as soon
as a delivery attempt returns non-zero.
I consider this unwanted: a super user defined delivery list in
aliases(5) is not applied if some
Hi,
I have just commited a rather deep change to the alias expansion logic
in smtpd. It fixes a bug reported by halex@ in virtual maps, where an
alias expanding to two different virtual users would end up being sent
only to the first one.
Alias expansion is tricky. We want to make sure
), can't you?
Depends on the MTA, and if smtpd supports this it's not obvious in
the config file.
Also + doesn't work with many web-forms that validate the address
syntax... :/
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:30:05 +1200
ml+helloke...@extensibl.com wrote:
You specify a character usually defaulting to - as a seperator
and then acceptable addresses
bob
bob-
pete-
for a domain like bobszz.net
so bobszz.net can receive mail to
b...@bobszz.net
On 31/08/2012, at 9:30, ml+helloke...@extensibl.com wrote:
I think you can use '+' character instead (bob+canitrust...@bobszz.net,
bob+groupedascompanyc...@bobszz.net), can't you?
Tried it lately? Every other website incorrectly reinvents is this a valid
email address logic. It's just a trivial
Kurt Mosiejczuk k...@se.rit.edu wrote:
Blowfish is older, not standardized, and hasn't received the attention
from the cryptographic community that AES has.
Blowfish isn't standardized? Not being chosen as a standard doesn't
mean that everyone is using an incompatible version of
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Kurt Mosiejczuk k...@se.rit.edu wrote:
And AES-128 (and only that flavor of AES, so far) has a crack making
decrypting it significantly quicker.
News to me. Reference?
(You are probably confusing this with the related-key attacks on
AES-192 and AES-256.)
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 16:34, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
And I'm fairly certain blowfish did get a lot of attention. And since
bcrypt is reasonably popular, I'd imagine blowfish *still* gets
attention from the cryptographic community.
The security of bcrypt is almost
I think this came up before but my Googling failed to find it.
I love disposable addresses and being able to say. Oi what you doing
giving my address to spammers, or have you had a virus??
A todo list was mentioned, I was just wondering if disposable addresses
was on it or would that be in a
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:54:45PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I think this came up before but my Googling failed to find it.
I love disposable addresses and being able to say. Oi what you doing
giving my address to spammers, or have you had a virus??
A todo list was mentioned, I was just
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:12:22 +0200
Gilles Chehade wrote:
I think this came up before but my Googling failed to find it.
I love disposable addresses and being able to say. Oi what you doing
giving my address to spammers, or have you had a virus??
A todo list was mentioned, I was just
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
You specify a character usually defaulting to - as a seperator
and then acceptable addresses
bob
bob-
pete-
for a domain like bobszz.net
so bobszz.net can receive mail to
b...@bobszz.net
Over on source-changes, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I don't disagree with using AES-128 as default on a possibly busy mail
server. I was just wondering why the word obsolete was used and if it
was simply because twofish and AES are faster.
Blowfish is older, not standardized,
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Over on source-changes, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I don't disagree with using AES-128 as default on a possibly busy mail
server. I was just wondering why the word obsolete was used and if it
was simply because twofish and AES are faster.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 16:34, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
And I'm fairly certain blowfish did get a lot of attention. And since
bcrypt is reasonably popular, I'd imagine blowfish *still* gets
attention from the cryptographic community.
The security of bcrypt is almost completely unrelated to the
Hello,
On 4.8 I was using smtpd to relay periodic mails. The box is
a firewall and the resolver is not configured at all.
smtp.conf
# This is the smtpd server system-wide configuration file.
# See smtpd.conf(5) for more information.
listen on lo0
map aliases { source db /etc/mail/aliases.db
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:35:07PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
That worked fine on 4.8, but with 4.9 the box does not send any mail :
/var/log/mailog:
smtpd[4269]:1317598201.5Tsv7GvPDRFc1Ozt:from=root@Y,
size=6325, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, relay=0@localhost [IPv6
Le Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:50:30 +0200,
Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org a écrit :
Hello,
That worked fine on 4.8, but with 4.9 the box does not send any
mail :
/var/log/mailog:
smtpd[4269]:1317598201.5Tsv7GvPDRFc1Ozt:from=root@Y,
size=6325, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, relay=0@localhost
mail :
/var/log/mailog:
smtpd[4269]:1317598201.5Tsv7GvPDRFc1Ozt:from=root@Y,
size=6325, nrcpts=1, proto=ESMTP, relay=0@localhost [IPv6:::1]
smtpd[30344]: 1317598201.5Tsv7GvPDRFc1Ozt:
to=logadmin@Y, delay=1, relay=(none) [],
stat=LocalError (Unable to resolve DNS f or domain
wrote:
On Jul 21 10:02:10, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:50:40 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd,
the one thing I am missing is running mailing lists.
I see it has been discussed before:
http
...@stare.cz wrote:
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd,
the one thing I am missing is running mailing lists.
I see it has been discussed before:
http://marc.info/?t=13170923832r=1w=2
Is it really possible to use commands as aliases, as said
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd,
the one thing I am missing is running mailing lists.
I see it has been discussed before:
http://marc.info/?t=13170923832r=1w=2
Is it really possible to use commands as aliases, as said in
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=131714762522589w=2
On Jul 21 10:02:10, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:50:40 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd,
the one thing I am missing is running mailing lists.
I see it has been discussed before:
http://marc.info/?t
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:28:12 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 21 10:02:10, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:50:40 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd,
the one thing I am missing is running mailing lists
On Jul 21 18:04:51, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 17:28:12 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 21 10:02:10, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:50:40 +0200
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
Having happily switched from postfix to smtpd
Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose?
Cheers,
Percy.
Index: scheduler.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c
--- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11
/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c
--- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11:13:40 - 1.6
+++ scheduler.c 17 Jul 2012 17:48:00 -
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ scheduler_timeout(int fd, short event, v
return;
scheduler_sleep
301 - 400 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
