Re: spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-09 Thread David Diggles
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:11:43PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 00:40, David Diggles wrote: > > I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering > > the spam > > emails that make it through to misc. Mostly non-english. I have been using > > SpamAssass

Re: spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-08 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:14:25 +0200 "Mikkel C. Simonsen" wrote: > David Diggles wrote: > > I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering the > > spam > > emails that make it through to misc. [...] > I use bogofilter, and it tags almost all spam from this mailing list as

Re: spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-08 Thread Mikkel C. Simonsen
David Diggles wrote: I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering the spam emails that make it through to misc. Mostly non-english. I have been using SpamAssassin and training it, yet the bayes in default weightings are not enough to get the misc spams into my spam bo

Re: spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-08 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 00:40, David Diggles wrote: > I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering > the spam > emails that make it through to misc. Mostly non-english. I have been using > SpamAssassin and training it, yet the bayes in default weightings are not > enoug

Re: spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-08 Thread Nicolai
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:40:56AM +1000, David Diggles wrote: > I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering the > spam > emails that make it through to misc. There are a few strings common in the spam that hits OpenBSD lists which are unlikely to be found in good mess

spam filtering misc spams

2012-10-08 Thread David Diggles
I'm interested in hearing about peoples experiences with spam filtering the spam emails that make it through to misc. Mostly non-english. I have been using SpamAssassin and training it, yet the bayes in default weightings are not enough to get the misc spams into my spam box... in fact many still