On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:29:57PM -0600, Gordon Klok wrote:
On 18-Mar-08, at 5:14 AM, bofh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Johan Mson Lindman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the key here is that not everything needs to be a 4 cpu quad
core
with 128Gigs of ram, and not that
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:12:05 you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:12:05 you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:16:13AM +0100, Siegbert Marschall wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:12:05 you wrote:
...
Got any more _freebsd_ success stories for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
No. But I will be shutting down a ten year old
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Johan Mson Lindman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice!
Got any more _freebsd_ success stories for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the key here is that not everything needs to be a 4 cpu quad core
with 128Gigs of ram, and not that it was running freebsd or openbsd.
--
snip
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail and any Unix like system
can handle that without problem.
Agreed. People nowadays seem to wrongly
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:56:44PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
Out of curiousity: Was that with or without spamfilters and
virusscanning? These two seem to cause
* Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 12:31]:
snip
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail and any Unix like system
can handle that without
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:11:45PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
well. it depends a LOT on your users' usage profile. I could not serve
our customers from such an old machine.
ok, the frontends are still 360MHz Sun netra t1s. But the storage
backend is a 14 disk raid5 of 15k RPM U320 drives,
* Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 15:41]:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:11:45PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
well. it depends a LOT on your users' usage profile. I could not serve
our customers from such an old machine.
ok, the frontends are still 360MHz Sun netra t1s. But the
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 12:31]:
snip
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail and any Unix like system
can
On 18-Mar-08, at 5:14 AM, bofh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Johan Mson Lindman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice!
Got any more _freebsd_ success stories for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the key here is that not everything needs to be a 4 cpu quad
core
with 128Gigs of ram, and not
I've just finished a small argument with some colleages here at work.
They just couldn't believe a Pentium 133 was serving a hundred e-mail
accounts...
Even in death we can count on OpenBSD to show how things should
be done.
RIP.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Alexander Bochmann [EMAIL
Marcus Andree wrote:
I've just finished a small argument with some colleages here at work.
They just couldn't believe a Pentium 133 was serving a hundred e-mail
accounts...
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've just finished a small argument with some colleages here at work.
They just couldn't believe a Pentium 133 was serving a hundred e-mail
accounts...
Did you not remind them the earliest UNIX systems had 64K of ram and
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
That is no big deal, however. sendmail and any Unix like system
can handle that without
Marcus Andree ha scritto:
I've just finished a small argument with some colleages here at work.
They just couldn't believe a Pentium 133 was serving a hundred e-mail
accounts...
Even in death we can count on OpenBSD to show how things should
be done.
RIP.
I still use an Pentium 166 with 64
At 05:09 PM 3/17/2008 -0400, bofh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've just finished a small argument with some colleages here at work.
They just couldn't believe a Pentium 133 was serving a hundred e-mail
accounts...
Did you not remind them
raven schreef:
I still use an Pentium 166 with 64 Mb with FreeBSD 5.2 that handle 400
email accounts without problem :)
a pic of my beast http://raven.lilik.it/foto/im000785.jpg (it's an old pic)
Doesn't matter that much in case of machine pictures, it get's worse
with people when the pics
...was rather unspectacular: Hardware failiure.
The system's name was base, originally installed with
OpenBSD 2.3 on Jun 12, 1998:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Jun 12 1998 etc/myname
It ran the OpenBSD 2.3 kernel and most of the userland until
it stopped responding about three weeks ago and
I will drink a beer to commemorate our lose.
Jay
...was rather unspectacular: Hardware failiure.
The system's name was base, originally installed with
OpenBSD 2.3 on Jun 12, 1998:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Jun 12 1998 etc/myname
It ran the OpenBSD 2.3 kernel and most of the userland
Thanks for interesting story; very sadly.
Just out of curiosity, what hardware was it?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:23:52PM +0100, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...was rather unspectacular: Hardware failiure.
The system's name was base, originally installed with
OpenBSD 2.3 on Jun 12, 1998:
...on Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 05:11:10PM +0300, Nickolay A. Burkov wrote:
Thanks for interesting story; very sadly.
Just out of curiosity, what hardware was it?
Can't find a dmesg currently, but from memory the
original setup was something like:
Pentium-133, 32MB RAM. 4GB Quantum IDE HDD,
I too retired a long serving oBSD/Pentium-Pro 200 back in November. As
one door closes ... fyi ... openBSD 4.3 is still small-iron friendly.
I run an stock install42 and 43 (no skinny or other customizations),
exclusive of the X and compiler sets, and it installs to and runs from a
256MB CF
24 matches
Mail list logo
