Re: undeadly (window managers)

2012-04-29 Thread Alexei Malinin
Brett wrote: bleh ... it does what it advertizes and works pretty fine, I've used it for years and the fact that it's a stone age version does not prevent me from working with it both at home at work. the reason why i like it is precisely because it's simple and doesn't come with tons of

Re: undeadly (window managers)

2012-04-29 Thread Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
Marc wrote: the reason why i like it is precisely because it's simple and doesn't come with tons of features that change all of the time, it's the same look feel on all systems I use, and has been like that for years. That is true for me, too. I don't use any pointing devices for normal

Re: undeadly (window managers)

2012-04-29 Thread Jonathan Thornburg
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=133568945200754w=1, Alexei Malinin Alexei.Malinin () mail ! ru wrote: I use twm (with a few initial settings made in the late 90s) more then 10 years (!), it fits all my needs at work and at home old-fogie mode I started with twm around 1986-7, and

Re: undeadly (window managers)

2012-04-28 Thread Brett
bleh ... it does what it advertizes and works pretty fine, I've used it for years and the fact that it's a stone age version does not prevent me from working with it both at home at work. the reason why i like it is precisely because it's simple and doesn't come with tons of features