On Tue, 2 May 2006, josh wrote:
Hello...
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any actual
reasons why.
Personally, I really dont see how a compiler is going to lessen
security, particuarly when
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:21:41PM +1200, josh wrote:
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any actual
reasons why.
If someone has enough access to your system to use a compiler (maliciously),
couldn't
On Tue, 2 May 2006, josh wrote:
Hello...
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any
actual reasons why.
Personally, I really dont see how a compiler is going to lessen
security, particuarly when
Hi :)
Maybe some people tend to think installing a compiler is giving an intruder the
possibility to compile his own code. Personally I think, that this thought is
one step too late for securing a system.
If an intruder already has compromised the system it has been proven that the
system is
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Brian wrote:
I am reading through the tree(3), and I need some clarification. If I
want to correctly remove an element from a red black tree that I have
found and free it's memory allocation, this code should work, right?
find.i = 400;
n = RB_FIND(inttree, head, find);
On 5/2/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 17:29, Henrik Borgh wrote:
I suscpect that the situation is pretty much the same on every laptop,
equpped with a Insyde MobilePRO BIOS,
Or it could just be Acer since I dont get any errors on my generic laptop with
Insyde
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 14:31, Henrik Borgh wrote:
Could you please tell if you are able to configure IRQ-settings
through your BIOS?
Nope, there are no settings for the PCMCIA IRQ's in the BIOS, it just works.
---
Lars Hansson
Apologies accepted.
bofh schreef:
On 5/1/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:31, bofh wrote:
I must say though, a well designed gui can be a great help in managing a
[...]
not believe him. Now that I'm managing a small bunch of checkpoint
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
My CD finally arrived and I immediately installed 3.9 in the first machine.
I immediately found a problem for me: it seems that the GENERIC kernel
no longer support the procfs filesystem.
Stephen Takacs wrote:
Instead of compiling a custom kernel, what is the best way (in Perl) to
get the list of current processes?
I have to scan the list every few seconds. A couple of years ago, I
tried executing an external ps, but found that it sometimes freezed.
I found the scanning of the
Hello,
For those who are interested, here is the latest info.
(I've build my latest snapshot this morning and tested it on the lenovo
thinkpad x60s)
It looks like developers fixed the ahci bios issue (THANKS!!!). Both
(bsd,bsd.rd)
kernels work fine now.
Still having problems with bsd.mp.
I was looking for performance on a wrap box with openbsd.
All infos I've found were much better than the results I got.
But that's not the point.
When I was locking at m0n0wall I found a patch for the
sis driver. Could it be relevant for openbsd too?
* Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-02 07:06]:
I am reading through the tree(3), and I need some clarification. If I want to
correctly remove an element from a red black tree that I have found and free
it's memory allocation, this code should work, right?
find.i = 400;
n =
While booting bsd.mp I noticed the following output:
ioapic0: pin 11 shares different IPL interrupts (40..50), degraded performance
Disable pcibios (boot bsd.mp -c; disable pcibios; quit;) and see if
the degraded performance message goes away. I bet it will, and your
bsd.mp performance problems
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:13:28PM +0200, Vincent Immler wrote:
Hi folks,
I own a HP Compaq nc6220. I really like this notebook, business look and
quality. But I have a serious problem with OpenBSD.
I just tried an OpenBSD 3.9 installation CD on it and can't boot
properly (already had
Disable pcibios (boot bsd.mp -c; disable pcibios; quit;) and see if the
degraded performance message goes away. I bet it will,
and your bsd.mp performance problems will do too.
Thx, but this didn't solve the problem.
Here the dmesg:
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon May 1 18:29:09 CEST
Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn your box
if it has no compiler installed.
02 May 2006 16:21:41 +1200, josh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello...
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being
On 2006/05/02 12:15, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
I was wondering about installing OpenBSD on a very old laptop (no cdrom) via
serial line. I am aware it would take literally ages.
Transferring the files over serial line shouldn't take /too/ long,
unless the laptop can't keep up with the serial
Anton Karpov wrote:
Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn your box
if it has no compiler installed.
Bull.
I've never heard of someone taking over a box using a compiler. After all,
the compiler is not exposed to the outside world. At most, they build some
tools
The laptop is really old, its a 486DX4, and it has no USB, so the
suggestions for that are no good. I cannot find anyone in melbourne that
sells oldschool pcmcia network cards, but I do have a null modem sitting
around that I use on serial console machines from time to time. I might look
into
Hello Anton,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 5:05:10 AM, you wrote:
AK Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn
AK your box if it has no compiler installed.
It's like saying that a handgun makes your house an inherently more
dangerous place. Handguns and compilers are both
Hi
Will the pdnsd package in the ports, function as a full featured dns
server with mysql backend.
--
Thank You
Anu Bhaskar
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 19:17, anu bhaskar wrote:
Will the pdnsd package in the ports, function as a full featured dns
server with mysql backend.
No.
Imagine the typical situation: an attacker get non-root access to your
system, maybe due to the hole in your network daemon foobard, maybe due to
the badly coded cgi, or maybe he is a legitimate shell user. The next his
step is to get full privileges, e.g. root account. Let suppose he has a l33t
hi
i did an cvsup from 38 to 3.9 then everthing was documented ( cd
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf ; config GENERIC ; cd ../compile/GENERIC ; make
depend )
to make shure if i did somthing wrong i got the whole source by ftp (src.tar.gz
and sys.tar.gz ) for 3.9
and get on both this error !
any
holger glaess dixit (2006-05-02, 14:04:02):
i did an cvsup from 38 to 3.9 then everthing was documented ( cd
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf ; config GENERIC ; cd ../compile/GENERIC ;
make depend )
to make shure if i did somthing wrong i got the whole source by ftp
(src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz )
On Monday 01 May 2006 21:00, mcb, inc. wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Dave Feustel wrote:
Below is a comment about X-Windows security sent to me
by a person with a lot of experience in computer security:
===
Dave,
X-Windows has been known to be insecure for some time. That is to
On 5/2/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 14:31, Henrik Borgh wrote:
Could you please tell if you are able to configure IRQ-settings
through your BIOS?
Nope, there are no settings for the PCMCIA IRQ's in the BIOS, it just works.
Are you using some special
Dave, I guess the interviewer is talking about this email by Theo:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=112475373731469w=2
where he states:
- When you free an object that is = 1 page in size, it is actually
returned to the system. Attempting to read or write to it after
you free
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
My CD finally arrived and I immediately installed 3.9 in the first machine.
I immediately found a problem for me: it seems that the GENERIC kernel
no longer support the procfs filesystem.
...on Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:49:26PM +0400, Anton Karpov wrote:
But what if your system has no compiler? When attacker should compile his
sploit anywhere, and transfer binary evil code onto your box. E.g. he has to
have access to the similar machine, maybe with similas OS version and arch.
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:21:41PM +1200, josh wrote:
Hello...
Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any actual
reasons why.
i had a machine get compromised once; now we don't have a compiler
on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anton Karpov wrote:
Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn your box
if it has no compiler installed.
No, not at all. You can't attack a compiler, it's not accessable from
the outside.
The only reason I can think of in
Compiling 3.9 under 3.8 is not supported, upgrade to 3.9 and build under
3.9.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
Step 1, in Building OpenBSD from Source is Upgrading to the closest
available binary.
It is possible to resolve errors below and build 3.9 under 3.8, but
takes some work, you have
On 5/2/06, Ed White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- When you free an object that is = 1 page in size, it is actually
returned to the system. Attempting to read or write to it after
you free is no longer acceptable. That memory is unmapped. You get
a SIGSEGV.
- For a decade and a bit, we
001_sendmail.patch for 3.9 says:
make obj
make depend
make
make install
Is there anything wrong with
make obj make depend make make install
?
-- Will
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 10:28:30 -0400, Will H. Backman proclaimed...
001_sendmail.patch for 3.9 says:
make obj
make depend
make
make install
Is there anything wrong with
make obj make depend make make install
No.
Will H. Backman wrote:
001_sendmail.patch for 3.9 says:
make obj
make depend
make
make install
Is there anything wrong with
make obj make depend make make install
Can't see anything wrong with it.
In my experience it's simple. Generally speaking, not installing a
compiler makes the system less secure. Why? real easy. Most systems I
have ever seen without a compiler has software running on it that is
behind on it's updates. When you ask the system administrator why, it
is Oh I don't
Hey,
I have 2 ethernet's connected to a sundance expansion board, but
ethernet's are not recognized. I'm using OpenBSD 3.9 and default kernel.
--dmesg--
vendor Sundance, unknown product 0x0200 (class network subclass
ethernet, rev 0x31) at pci1 dev 0 function 0 not configured
Anton Karpov wrote
If he can break in as a lowly user uname -a will tell him what it is
anyway. And don't tell me we should disable that command or cause it to
lie because then I'll shoot you down another way.
Re-read my message, please. I didn't tell he cannot stat os version and
Maybe, because in some cases, it just takes a bit more time to 0wn your
box
if it has no compiler installed.
No, not at all. You can't attack a compiler, it's not accessable from
the outside.
Noone here talks about attacking a compiler ;) We're discussing differences
for attacker,
But what if your system has no compiler? When attacker should compile his
sploit anywhere, and transfer binary evil code onto your box. E.g. he has
to
have access to the similar machine, maybe with similas OS version and arch.
I know not having a compiler has been considered secure
Hi - So I have this wierd problem, which is duplicated on 3 identical
machines, where I get a bunch of bmc_io_wait fails messages (see the
end of the dmesg). The longer the machine is on, the more messages get
tacked on. I'm wondering what this could be. Any ideas/hints?
For the curious, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hej Bob,
Bob Beck wrote:
In my experience it's simple. Generally speaking, not installing a
compiler makes the system less secure. Why? real easy. Most systems I
have ever seen without a compiler has software running on it that is
behind
I have 2 ethernet's connected to a sundance expansion board, but
ethernet's are not recognized. I'm using OpenBSD 3.9 and default
kernel.
You forgot to tell us which architecture you are running OpenBSD on
(something an unabridged dmesg would have told us).
I'll suppose you are running an
Sorry, im running OpenBSD on i386 system. I dont have Sundance Ethernet
card.. I have two 3Com cards connected to Sundance Expansion board.
-- dmesg --
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R)
...on Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:46:01AM -0500, Graham Toal wrote:
Back in the old days when the only access to a system was
by a modem to a login prompt, and there was no networking
available to make things easy, the only way to get a
binary on to a machine was to somehow enter it from the
Dave Feustel pointed to
http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/fr/sciences/fichiers/lti/cansecwest2006-duflot-paper.pdf
as an example of X-Windows has been known to be insecure for some time..
A brief perusal of the paper shows that it describes a way for the
*superuser* to circumvent securelevel
On 5/2/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am not asserting that the compromise-pack did not have
a precompiled sshd binary for openbsd ( the prior hop
up the compromise chain in this case was a debianlinux ),
but if it didn't, it may not have rooted machine B.
This is a
2006/5/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anton Karpov wrote:
Noone here talks about attacking a compiler ;) We're discussing
differences
for attacker, depending on compiler available or not.
They should.
There is a classic by Ken Thompson (I think) about using a compiler
to
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:33:48AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
i am not asserting that the compromise-pack did not have
a precompiled sshd binary for openbsd ( the prior hop
up the compromise chain in this case was a debianlinux ),
but if it didn't, it may not have rooted machine
Thanks.
What do you mean by more current tree?
The CVS build? (e.g.: -current versus -stable)
I tried updating directly from anoncvs.ca.openbsd.org this morning
still from the -stable branch and got the same stopper.
Keep in mind that the initial install was to a formatted drive on a
clean or
On 5/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a classic by Ken Thompson (I think) about using a compiler
to create a back door which has no traces in the source of either
the compiler or of the back-doored module.
Something about who can you trust.
right. and if this is the
Taken from http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/
TorFAQ#ServerAnonymity
FreeBSD 4.x, all versions of OpenBSD, and all versions of NetBSD
have broken gethostbyname_r() implementations that cause Tor's
threads to stomp on each other. So rather than threading on these
platforms, we
Hi all,
This e-mail has not the purpose of clearing any doubt. It's only meant
to thanks everyone who belongs to this mailing list, those who are
developers, those who work translating any kind of pages and answering
e-mails. I also would like to give my congratulations to the OpenBSD
project.
Sorry, im running OpenBSD on i386 system. I dont have Sundance
Ethernet card.. I have two 3Com cards connected to Sundance Expansion
board.
Aha! It turns out your expansion box is not supported in the 3.9
release, but only in -CURRENT.
However, the changes are trivial to
Thanks for all the suggestions (on list and off list).
At this point I have:
* Low-level formatted my hard drive (twice)
* Re-downloaded all AMD64 distribution files and verified checksum
values.
* Re-installed three times
* Re-checked out the CVS OPENBSD_3_9 branch four times
Attempted to
Please pardon me if this has already been reported, but this problem
still persists in the release.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-03/0565.html
-peter
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources) and i got this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris /etc/passwd
cris:*:1000:0:Cristiano
jared and daniel,
What advantages does Ttorent has:
1. Torrent itself is a protocl. It should be possible to implement it even in
Perl
2. In Case of Universities wich have maybe NO mirror:
Some universitives have a VERY liberal administration.
In Fact that means that every part of the
Please pardon me if this has already been reported, but this problem
still persists in the release.
Of course it still persists in the release, since it was corrected after
3.9 was finalized; however, the fix has been commited to 3.9-STABLE.
Miod
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Cristiano Deana wrote:
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources) and i got
this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources)
and i got this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris /etc/passwd
usermod -G wheel user
2006/5/2, Cristiano Deana [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources) and i got
this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel)
Initial install was with media from:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/amd64
CVS checkout was done with:
CVS_RSH='/usr/bin/ssh'
CVSROOT='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs'
cvs -q checkout -rOPENBSD_3_9 -P src
Which, if I understand the documentation correctly, should have
given me the -stable
After install/upgrade OpenBSD 3.9 at the system startup the operating
system jams with this error: fxp0: SCB time out.
The error is occured when the system tried to assign the IP at the
network card.
Now I have disabled the network startup.
The dmesg reports:
===
OpenBSD 3.9
On 02/05/06, Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
privileges to replace your compiler with backdoored one, he has another
65535 ways to abuse your box.
Did you mean 65536 ways?
Anyhow, I doubt many people nowadays have 16-bit boxes on public networks. :)
I'm trying to boot OpenBSD 3.9 on my sony vaio, in order to play with it
onto my laptop (which is currently powered by freebsd).
Everything seems to be fine, except wireless card:
wi0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intersil PRISM2.5 rev 0x01pci_intr_map: no
mapping for pin A
: couldn't map interrupt
The openbsd if_sis is a port of the freebsd driver, so you might be able to
make the patch apply on openbsd. do you know what the patch actually does
and if it is worth the time to try and apply to the openbsd driver?
Wild Karl-Heinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking for performance on a
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:22, Ted Unangst wrote:
But it seems that this feature was disabled just before shipping 3.8
because too many ports were instable. 3.9 should come with it.
how does it seem this feature was disabled? look at cvs log. nothing
was disabled.
Disabled = Not enabled
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:33:48AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
i am not asserting that the compromise-pack did not have
a precompiled sshd binary for openbsd ( the prior hop
up the compromise chain in this case was a
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:23:21PM -0600, Ed V. wrote:
Initial install was with media from:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/amd64
CVS checkout was done with:
CVS_RSH='/usr/bin/ssh'
CVSROOT='[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs'
cvs -q checkout -rOPENBSD_3_9 -P src
Which, if I understand
Okay, then it seems like that this is a problem with HP NC notebooks in
general - I wonder why it isn't fixed then ...
I had an old bios revision and updated to a newer one - without improvement.
Tried the latest snapshot - without improvement.
Hmm ... what is going to be cheaper? Selling this
[snip]
One thing I didn't follow in this story is why did this 'virus' change
the host key?
It's not like you can't use the old key with the new sshd install, is it?
I see no problem with doing so, I have done so regularly in the past when
doing upgrades. As long as you back up your host
On 5/2/06, Ed White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:22, Ted Unangst wrote:
But it seems that this feature was disabled just before shipping 3.8
because too many ports were instable. 3.9 should come with it.
how does it seem this feature was disabled? look at cvs log.
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we didn't have that little PIII/450 sitting next to the
machine now, for the purposes of bringing live, getting
patches onto, making .tgzs, and then
On 02/05/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
once again, nothing changed. if it wasn't enabled in 3.8, it's not
enabled in 3.9 and it's not going to get enabled in 3.A.
eghhh... Is this the start of the version naming debate again? :)
What was the conclusion from the last time? ;)
Hello chefren,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 7:51:23 AM, you wrote:
c It's quite difficult to shoot yourselves without a gun
Yes, exactly... like I said the danger lies in the user, not in the
tool.
I suppose if a person wants to remain a kludge, and a stumble-bum for
the rest of their life, then they
Hello,
I'm thinking about playing with pfsync/carp a bit and for this I will need to
buy few additional NICs. From various notes it seems Gbit Realtek chips might
not be that crappy as their 100Mbit counterprarts (except 8139c+) and the cards
with them seem to even be cheaper than 100Mbit cards
On 22/03/06, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 07:55:39AM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
Keith Richardson wrote:
Hannah wrote:
Mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't work either (similar loop error
message). So could one please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
I brought up a 3.9 server and have patched it with the sendmail patch. My
question is how does one prove that the box has been patched in 2,3 or 4 months?
TIA
Mike
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 22:44, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
The openbsd if_sis is a port of the freebsd driver, so you might be able to
make the patch apply on openbsd. do you know what the patch actually does
and if it is worth the time to try and apply to the openbsd driver?
What I've understood,
On 5/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought up a 3.9 server and have patched it with the sendmail patch. My
question is how does one prove that the box has been patched in 2,3 or 4 months?
TIA
Mike
Keep notes?
I already tried to submit a bug report on a package with new dependencies so
I'll just
post to misc and see if I can get some guidance. It seems like a few packages
depend on
gettext and I'm having issues installing it's new version. I get this:
Can't install gettext-0.14.5p1 because of
On 5/2/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing is trusting the updated hostkey. Imagine you are a
sysadmin at a university. Do you keep the old hostkey when you
reinstall the system on a specific host? What about when you upgrade a
Sun workstation, but keep the old
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we didn't have that little PIII/450 sitting next to the
machine now, for the purposes of bringing
On 03/05/06, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/2/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing is trusting the updated hostkey. Imagine you are a
sysadmin at a university. Do you keep the old hostkey when you
reinstall the system on a specific host? What about
Hello,
Can someone please give a straight answer about these PHP security
holes? OpenBSD 3.9 released yesterday had packages supporting:
php 4.4.1p0
php 5.0.5p0
are either of these vulnerable? if so, is someone going to release
updated packages (not just ports)?
the php 5.1.3 release:
The
I shot out an email re: this last week but it was under 3.8. I'm on
3.9 release now, and the device again shows up as not configured. It's
in the source(in dev/pci/pcidevs*), but I'm not sure how to go about
to get this to work(I dont see it referenced in the GENERIC config, so
I nothing to
Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/2006 09:07:35 am
On 5/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought up a 3.9 server and have patched it with the sendmail
patch. My question is how does one prove that the box has been patched
in 2,3 or 4 months?
TIA
Mike
Keep notes?
You
Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
Tan
On Tue, May 02, 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought up a 3.9 server and have patched it with the sendmail
patch. My question is how does one prove that the box has been
patched in 2,3 or 4 months?
Check the version:
-char Version[] = 8.13.4;
+char Version[] = 8.13.5.20060308;
2006/5/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
Probably would have essentially identical behavior on any BSD/Linux.
No, in FreeBSD if your group is '0' then you (obviously) are in the
'wheel' group
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian
On 5/2/06, Tan Dang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
Sorry to respond to myself, but the 1.522 revision of www/index.html
switches the page to Japanese.
Tan
OpenBSD incorporated this patch quite some time ago.
Wild Karl-Heinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 22:44, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
The openbsd if_sis is a port of the freebsd driver, so you might be able to
make the patch apply on openbsd. do you know what the patch
On 5/2/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you backup a key from an old workstation onto a new workstation,
and then dispose of the old workstation [in the university setting],
then what if the intruider gets access to the HDD data (i.e. the key)
of the old workstation?
Just a headsup for others, I had no issue installing gettext(needed
for wget) but this was on a fresh 3.9 install. What happens if you use
pkg_add w/ -r?
On 5/2/06, Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already tried to submit a bug report on a package with new dependencies so
I'll just
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:26:37PM +, Tan Dang wrote:
Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
April Fools!
-Ray-
From: Tan Dang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
Tan
I see English when accessing www.openbsd.org as I have always done so. You
might want to look at your locale settings.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
