Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Would anyone happen to have a pf.conf file that will prioritize World
of Warcraft (Multi User) and Liniage 2 packets
For Lineage 2,
http://support.plaync.com/cgi-bin/plaync.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1713
lists the ports as 2009, 2106, and .
I don't know
Thank you all for your help
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/12/06, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Would anyone happen to have a pf.conf file that will prioritize World
of Warcraft (Multi User) and Liniage 2 packets
For Lineage 2,
I have just upgraded an i386 from 3.9 to 4.0. It's an MX mail server
that writes emails to another PC via NFS.
The delivery of the email via NFS is now VERY slow.
I noticed that when more then one precess try to access the filesystem
via NFS it is very slow. Even a simple ls of a small
Julien TOUCHE wrote:
i'm currently looking for solution to monitor external environment from
an openbsd server.
I'm currently developing a soekris add-on board board which will allows
(among other things) to connect 16 external sensors. The driver will
integrate nicely with OpenBSD sensor and
Hello,
I am using OpenBSD 4.0 with pf. On my machine I run some services
including ssh. Since I want access to my machine from outside I opened
the ssh port and created a rule that allows outgoing traffic:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port 22
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp,
Stephen Takacs wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Kyle George wrote:
Actually, what I should have said was uncomment the ddb.console=1 line in
sysctl.conf. That's where it should go. It will work in either place
though.
Yeah that's what I did. :-) Unfortunately the machine
Hello,
I'm using lirc on linux and i want to switch to openbsd but i can not find
some equivalent package to lirc;
Have i miss something or have some body a good idea ?
Regard's
Claude
--
View this message in context:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
There have been changes in 4.0 that can explain this behavior?
No.
Is there something I can do to solve it?
Try playing with the NIC. See if you get the same amount of throughput
with 4.0 that you got with 3.9.
-p.
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
There have been changes in 4.0 that can explain this behavior?
No.
Is there something I can do to solve it?
Try playing with the NIC. See if you get the same amount of throughput
with 4.0 that you
On 2006/11/12 11:24, Gerald Holl wrote:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port 22
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any modulate state
So long, from two of my PCs outside the network I can connect to the ssh
service but from exactly one PC it does not work
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Is there any case that makes NFS in 4.0 read the listing of a directory?
Yes, the getcwd() change. I wonder if it exposed any other bug in our
NFS code (as it did in the past, but those got fixed, since they were
reported).
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/11/12 11:24, Gerald Holl wrote:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port 22
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any modulate state
So long, from two of my PCs outside the network I can connect to the ssh
service but from exactly one
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:31:59PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
The NEOMEDIA kernel is GENERIC with the following two options (I used
them in 3.9 to avoid kernel freezes):
maxusers 64
option NKMEMPAGES_MAX=32768
These problems are still there, so keep using them.
-p.
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Is there any case that makes NFS in 4.0 read the listing of a directory?
Yes, the getcwd() change. I wonder if it exposed any other bug in our
NFS code (as it did in the past, but those got fixed,
Martin Toft wrote:
Since the OP is using 4.0, this might be of interest: flags S/SA keep
state is default [0].
[0] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2006-10/0549.html
Hmm, sorry, I didn't read it right. It's only in -current.
Regards,
Martin
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/11/12 11:24, Gerald Holl wrote:
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp to ($ext_if) port 22
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any modulate state
So long, from two of my PCs outside the network I can connect to the ssh
service but from exactly one
I have some boxen in colo, and while I can go there to upgrade it's not
nearly as convenient as sitting at my desk. So I chose to upgrade over
ssh, knowing that if something goes horribly wrong I *can* drive down
and fix it on-site.
I just wanted to say that the process as documented in the FAQ
i've read through all the docs that i can find on systrace policy generation and
enforcement and have hit a snag when trying to generate a working policy for vi
that restricts the files that can be read and written by a user. the policy is
generated by running systrace -A vi test.txt for an
On 2006/11/12 15:40, Gerald Holl wrote:
modulate state is creating state from a packet after the connection
setup, which doesn't have all the relevant information to validate the
sequence numbers correctly. You should use flags S/SA keep state or
...modulate state on all your rules unless
On Sun 2006.11.12 at 08:55 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
consider sorting your policies...also, try to be more generic in other
places, for example, match /usr/lib/libc.so.*
Policy: /usr/bin/vi, Emulation: native
native-issetugid: permit
native-mprotect: permit
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:59:47PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Is there any case that makes NFS in 4.0 read the listing of a directory?
Yes, the getcwd() change. I wonder if it exposed any other bug in our
NFS code (as it did in the past, but those got fixed,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:50:54AM +1100, nuffnough wrote:
On 11/9/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Phase one. Just a packet to initiate, then a packet back to say that
the far end doesn't like me. Debug on the other end indicated that when my
end initiates, it does it
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Now that the DNS problem is solved, it SEEMS that the problem with NFS
is reduced.
Interesting... let me know what else you find out.
1) Is NFS activity in some way related to DNS?
Not really. Well, both go through the
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:31:30AM -0800, Claude Brassel wrote:
Hello,
I'm using lirc on linux and i want to switch to openbsd but i can not find
some equivalent package to lirc;
I am planning to port it to get it to work but I am not sure when I will be
done. Do you want to sponsor it? :)
Hi,
Here is two dmegs from two identically pcengines WRAP 2E boxes that
until today had lm77-sensors providing the temperature, but today on of
them don't and I get this:
unknown at iic1 addr 0x48 not configured
---
lmtemp0 at iic1 addr 0x48: lm77
Is this a hardware failure?? Other than this
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:40:23 -0600 (CST)
Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Original message
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:44:13 -0500
From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Just one more cisco... please
To: misc@openbsd.org
I just found out that to add a 4th interface to
Hi.
After updating from OpenBSD 3.9 to 4.0 I extracted the new tarballs
src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz and got the patches for OpenBSD 4.0
from openbsd.org/errata.html
I had no problem applying the patches except for 002_openssl which
stops while make with:
# make
[... snipp ...]
=== crypto
cc -O2
rm -rf /usr/obj/* and then try again.
P.S. I have an error code 71 on one of my boxes on the make
install...think my disk is now full of cruft from countless upgrades, it's
time to wipe it and start over.
--
~Allie D.
On Sun, November 12, 2006 09:28, Andreas Maus wrote:
Hi.
After updating
From: Andreas Maus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems applying 002_openssl.patch for OpenBSD 4.0
Hi.
After updating from OpenBSD 3.9 to 4.0 I extracted the new tarballs
src.tar.gz and sys.tar.gz and got the patches for OpenBSD 4.0
from openbsd.org/errata.html
I had no problem applying the
Hello,
I am planning to port it to get it to work but I am not sure when I will
be done. Do you want to sponsor it? :)
Sure i can sponsor you with some old remote controls :))
But I only want to support user space serial drivers to begin with as that
is the remote I want to get working and
I wonder what do (pkg_add -u -r) exactly, is it supposed to notify me with
the new v. of my installed pkgs or update it recursively?
thanks all
--
M.Salah
Original message
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:26:10 -0500
From: Okan Demirmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: systrace: vi policy
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Sun 2006.11.12 at 08:55 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
consider sorting your policies...also, try to be more generic in other
Hi Allie.
Thanks.
Clearing /usr/obj did it.
I guess running make clean (as suggested
by Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would also
a solution.
Thanks,
Andreas.
On 11/12/06, Allie D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rm -rf /usr/obj/* and then try again.
P.S. I have an error code 71 on one of my boxes
Half the time after resuming my T40 laptop from suspend my NFS
connection hangs. If I do a df or do shell file name completion on
the mounted directory name my xterm hangs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] df -k
nfs server grits:/home: not responding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ls donfs server grits:/home: not
On Sun 2006.11.12 at 12:15 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Original message
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:26:10 -0500
From: Okan Demirmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: systrace: vi policy
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Sun 2006.11.12 at 08:55 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
consider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi!
I already searched the archives for that, but only found out that the
missing xorg sets checksums have something to do with the build process.
But why aren't they just added after the build? Where can I get the
checksums for the xorg sets?
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:15:39 -0600 (CST)
Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original message
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:26:10 -0500
From: Okan Demirmen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: systrace: vi policy
To: misc@openbsd.org
On Sun 2006.11.12 at 08:55 -0600, Jacob
Salut,
I have a problem with direct connection of two servers using IPsec. The
IKE key exchange always comes up, but then it seems that both the routing
and the encryption go entirely wrong.
The host exchange their internal addresses (10.16.1.1 and 10.1.1.1) as
ID tokens for phase 2. However, if
Tonnerre LOMBARD schrieb:
Salut,
I have a problem with direct connection of two servers using IPsec. The
IKE key exchange always comes up, but then it seems that both the routing
and the encryption go entirely wrong.
The host exchange their internal addresses (10.16.1.1 and 10.1.1.1) as
Salut,
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:24:23PM +0100, Ralph Gessner wrote:
You realy do a ping -I 10.1.1.1 10.16.1.1 or only a ping 10.16.1.1?
You must have the 10.1.1.1 as source ip. A normal ping on the gateway
ueses the external ip as source!
Yes, this one works so far. However, how would one
From the spamd man page:
GREYLISTING
When run in greylisting mode, spamd will run in the normal mode for
any
addresses blacklisted by spamd-setup(8). Connections from
addresses not
blacklisted by spamd-setup(8) will be considered for greylisting.
Such
connections will not be
Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
You must have the 10.1.1.1 as source ip. A normal ping on the gateway
ueses the external ip as source!
Yes, this one works so far. However, how would one configure this
statically? Is there any way other than route add -host 10.1.1.1 10.16.1.1 ?
I know no way of
I wrote:
Maybe another way is setting up a second tunnel to encrypt the traffic
between the two outside interfaces of your gatways.
If you are using 4.0 then it is worth reading the manpage of
ipsec.onf(5). It has greatly improved since 3.9 and there is almost no
need to use
(Note: since most of this could be relevant, I snipped very little.
Scroll down some.)
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Marc Peters wrote:
hi folks.
i have issues with the ftp-proxy. i am using openbsd 4.0 which i fetch
during the release-phase, so i think it is on status of
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:31:40AM -0800, Greg Thomas wrote:
Half the time after resuming my T40 laptop from suspend my NFS
connection hangs. If I do a df or do shell file name completion on
the mounted directory name my xterm hangs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] df -k
nfs server grits:/home: not
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:12:37PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
Thank you very much. In spite of bob@'s heckling, it was a lot of fun.
Dear Jason,
I must admit than when I heard the audio I found the talk to be somewhat
superficial though humorous. However once I saw the video I got
On 11/12/06, Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:31:40AM -0800, Greg Thomas wrote:
Half the time after resuming my T40 laptop from suspend my NFS
connection hangs. If I do a df or do shell file name completion on
the mounted directory name my xterm hangs:
On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:23 PM, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:12:37PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
Thank you very much. In spite of bob@'s heckling, it was a lot of
fun.
Dear Jason,
I must admit than when I heard the audio I found the talk to
be somewhat
i know this is likely not possible for a number of reasons but i figured i'd
ask: are there or have there been any plans to port openbsd to run on cisco
hardware?
googling for something like this is not very productive since the CARP vs. VRRP
and firewall interoperation links dominate searches
i know this is likely not possible for a number of reasons
but i figured i'd
ask: are there or have there been any plans to port openbsd
to run on cisco
hardware?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong
Last time I had a look, the platform was essentially a PII, with fxp
NICs and a PCI (or
i know this is likely not possible for a number of reasons but i figured i'd
ask: are there or have there been any plans to port openbsd to run on cisco
hardware?
googling for something like this is not very productive since the CARP vs. VRRP
and firewall interoperation links dominate searches
On 11/12/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:31:30AM -0800, Claude Brassel wrote:
Hello,
I'm using lirc on linux and i want to switch to openbsd but i can not find
some equivalent package to lirc;
I am planning to port it to get it to work but I am
Salut,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 02:04:20PM +1100, Craig Barraclough wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong
Last time I had a look, the platform was essentially a PII, with fxp
NICs and a PCI (or was it ISA?) flash card for the OS.
Most Cisco hardware I'm aware of is either MIPS or PowerPC
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:18:31PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:23 PM, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:12:37PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
What software did you use for your slides?
I know it is not magicpoint and of course not Monkeysoft
54 matches
Mail list logo
