[SOLVED] Re: Strange VPN problem

2007-01-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi,

On Wed, 03.01.2007 at 22:54:16 +0100, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a very odd problem with a VPN machine. The situation:

nevermind, it was human error (expired certificates) after all. I have
to find out whether the error messages should have told me this earlier
on, or whether I was only too blind to see.


Best,
--Toni++



Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator

2007-01-04 Thread chefren

On 1/4/07 2:17 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Get real, meta postings (postings about other postings) also build 
this misc community. You cannot expect a channel to carry 100% data 
(relevance),


What should we insist on?


Is there something to insist on on an open list? As I tried to 
explain, an open list is kept in check with in-band signaling (posting 
yells and good examples.), it can not operate without some loss, 
people need for example space to post excuses and those can be 
inspiring examples themselves.


This list is what is, very nice mix of beginners and highly 
experienced people. The stupid questions of the beginners keep the 
experienced nicely with the feet on the ground and the thorough 
answers of the experienced give the stupids something to learn.




How about 20%?


Like clocks and PLL's for 10b/8b encoding as used in Ethernet? A 
proven fruitful compromise.



Or can we aim higher?


SONET has about 0.1% but needs far better clocks and PLL's (a one 
should be correctly detected after 1000 zero's.) that would need higly 
educated newbies and far more experienced developers! I presume those 
don't exist. Even Theo talking to Theo himselves wouldn't reach that.



Nope.  We can't aim higher when there are people like you, full of
hate, and once again not adding real content.


Theo! you are paranoid, I love you and OpenBSD! Really!!!

XXX chefren

(Happy New Year to all!)



landisk (plextor) installation question

2007-01-04 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello,
I got a plextor PX-EH16L yesterday, it has the required serial console
and I now have a linux login console.

The following file
(ftp://ftp.belnet.be/pub/packages/openbsd/snapshots/landisk/INSTALL.landisk)
mentions this:
Preparing your System for OpenBSD Installation:
---
To be able to boot the OpenBSD/landisk installation program, you will
need to copy a miniroot image onto the CF or harddrive that the machine
uses.

The plextor has a samsung harddrive. I'm sorry if this sounds stupid,
but what is the easiest or fastest way to get this miniroot image
(miniroot40fs) on the harddrive?
Do I have to mount the drive in other PC and install this miniroot
image a special way?

I would really appreciate if someone could give me further directions.

Thank you very much!
Regards
Didier



Re: landisk (plextor) installation question

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Reindl
Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,
 I got a plextor PX-EH16L yesterday, it has the required serial console
 and I now have a linux login console.
 
 The following file
 (ftp://ftp.belnet.be/pub/packages/openbsd/snapshots/landisk/INSTALL.landisk)
 mentions this:
 Preparing your System for OpenBSD Installation:
 ---
 To be able to boot the OpenBSD/landisk installation program, you will
 need to copy a miniroot image onto the CF or harddrive that the machine
 uses.
 
 The plextor has a samsung harddrive. I'm sorry if this sounds stupid,
 but what is the easiest or fastest way to get this miniroot image
 (miniroot40fs) on the harddrive?
 Do I have to mount the drive in other PC and install this miniroot
 image a special way?
 
 I would really appreciate if someone could give me further directions.

Yes. Swap drive to another box and 'dd if=miniroot40.fs of=/dev/rwd1c'
it over. Swap back and boot.

Sadly your disk will only run in PIO 4 mode because of some DMA bug ...

martin



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Umnada Tyrolla
 I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so, well. -this 
 list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite 
 google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how long will it 
 last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do have an old 
 host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm sure there are 
 those on this list with longer.

First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but thanks. Secondly, I
think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage time which says
what kind of machine you have.

You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not some bragbox) says
what kind of software and hardware stresses have been going. I've got over
5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all pf,
spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.



Lancement de l'annuaire creation-entreprise.fr

2007-01-04 Thread Jean-François
Bonjour,

lancement le 3 janvier 2007 du site creation-entreprise.fr du groupe
Viaduc..

Seuls les itablissements proposant un service didii aux TPE-PME sont
acceptis sur le site www.creation-entreprise.fr.

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement.

Liquipe Viaduc
www.creation-entreprise.fr

 br/

Offre riservie exclusivement aux entreprises.

Conformiment ` la Loi Informatique et Libertis parue au Journal Officiel
du 6 janvier 1978, vous disposez d'un droit d'acchs, de rectification, et
d'opposition aux donnies personnelles vous concernant. Pour ne plus
recevoir d'informations de notre part, Cliquez ici



Re: OT Was: Wanted: OpenBSD Systems Administrator

2007-01-04 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt

Theo de Raadt wrote:

Nope.  We can't aim higher when there are people like you, full of
hate, and once again not adding real content.

  


i hate those haters! we should hang their leader, it will fix everything.

;)



T-shirt question

2007-01-04 Thread Bruno Gallant

Hello,

I placed an order for an OpenBSD t-shirt on December 23rd, and nobody
got back to me.  I used the On-Line ordering site
(https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order)

Thank you.

--
# Bruno Gallant - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
http://www.imageine.com



Anone using A8V-VM mother board on OpenBSD 4.0/amd64 and getting proper sound output?

2007-01-04 Thread Siju George

Hi,

I am able to hear only very low sound using the A8V-VM motherboard on
OpenBSD 4.0/amd64.
Could Somebody help me troubleshoot it please?
Details below

Thankyou so much :-)

kind regards

Siju

=
$ mixerctl -a
outputs.dac02.source=hdaudio
inputs.dac03.mute=off
inputs.dac03=123,123
inputs.dac04.mute=off
inputs.dac04=123,123
inputs.dac05.mute=off
inputs.dac05=123,123
outputs.mix09.mute=off
inputs.mix09.dac04.mut=off
inputs.mix09.dac05.mut=off
inputs.sel0a.source=mix07
inputs.sel0b.source=mix07
inputs.sel0c.source=dac04
inputs.sel0d.source=dac05
inputs.sel0e.source=mix08
inputs.sel0f.source=pink1f
outputs.sel0f=85,85
inputs.sel10.source=blue20
inputs.sel11.source=sel0f
inputs.sel12.source=sel11
outputs.sel12.mute=off
outputs.sel12=119,119
outputs.sel13.mute=off
outputs.sel13=123,123
outputs.sel14.mute=off
outputs.sel14=123
outputs.sel15.mute=off
outputs.sel15=123,123
outputs.sel16.mute=off
outputs.sel16=123,123
outputs.sel17.mute=off
outputs.sel17=123,123
inputs.sel18.source=beep19
outputs.sel18.mute=on
outputs.sel18=119
outputs.green1a.mute=off
outputs.green1a=123,123
outputs.green1a.boost=on
outputs.green1b.mute=off
outputs.green1b=123,123
outputs.green1b.boost=off
outputs.blue1c.mute=off
outputs.blue1c=123,123
outputs.blue1c.dir=output
outputs.pink1d.mute=off
outputs.pink1d=123,123
outputs.pink1d.dir=output
outputs.unknown1e.mute=off
outputs.unknown1e=123
outputs.pow26.source=mix07
inputs.usingdac=030405
$ mixerctl outputs.sel18.mute=off
outputs.sel18.mute: on - on
$
==
$ cat /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #690: Sat Sep 16 20:26:25 MDT 2006
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 469037056 (458044K)
avail mem = 389718016 (380584K)
using 11502 buffers containing 47112192 bytes (46008K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0730 (54 entries)
bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. A8V-VM
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+, 2200.44 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,NXE,MMXX,FFXSR,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW
cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 512KB
64b/line 16-way L2 cache
cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative
cpu0: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x0336 rev 0x00
pchb1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x1336 rev 0x00
pchb2 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x2336 rev 0x00
pchb3 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x3336 rev 0x00
pchb4 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x4336 rev 0x00
vendor VIA, unknown product 0x5336 (class system subclass interrupt,
rev 0x00) at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured
pchb5 at pci0 dev 0 function 6 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x6290 rev 0x00
pchb6 at pci0 dev 0 function 7 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x7336 rev 0x00
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 VIA K8HTB AGP rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor VIA, unknown product 0x3230 rev 0x01
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 VIA VT8251 SATA rev 0x00: DMA
pciide0: using irq 5 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x07: DMA,
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to
compatibility
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: ST340014A
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38166MB, 78165360 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: SONY, DVD RW DRU-830A, SS20 SCSI0
5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
uhci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x90: irq 11
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x90: irq 4
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x90: irq 5
usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2
uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci3 at pci0 dev 16 function 3 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x90: irq 6
usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3
uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ehci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 4 VIA VT6202 USB rev 0x90: irq 4
usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub4 at usb4
uhub4: VIA EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 

Re: Wondering about usage of /usr/bin v /usr/local/bin...

2007-01-04 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Craig Skinner wrote on Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:14:32PM +:
 On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
 
 For example, on one small LAN with about 50 active users, i called
 that place /usr/usta:
 
 What does usta stand for?

Oh, that's just kind of $site, see http://www.usta.de/ (in german).
UStA = Unabhaengiger Studierenden-Ausschuss = independent student
board, it's the executive committee elected by all the students of
the University of Karlsruhe, working on student's social, political,
cultural and economical affairs.  The independent says that it's
not organised in the (crippled) way prescribed by state and law,
but instead in a more efficient and more democratic way decided
upon in a public vote of all students held in 1977.

 but now have sort of settled on /usr/local/site/[s]bin, libexec,...
 for my local site specific scripts.

Sounds very reasonable, imho.



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Der Engel

Umnada,

Did you get his point?

On 1/4/07, Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so, well. -this
 list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite
 google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how long will it
 last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do have an old
 host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm sure there are
 those on this list with longer.

First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but thanks. Secondly, I
think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage time which says
what kind of machine you have.

You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not some bragbox) says
what kind of software and hardware stresses have been going. I've got over
5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all pf,
spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.




Slow RAID io

2007-01-04 Thread edgarz

Hi all!
Installed fresh CURRENT on intel NH/SR1475NH1, with Intel RAID SRCS16 (SATA), 
running RAID5.
All hardware is recognised, but i have a problems with slow raid performance.
maximum what i saw in iostat was a 8.2MB/s

Any ideas?


DMESG:

OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1331: Wed Jan  3 09:48:30 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80clock_battery
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 3 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,CNXT-ID,CX16
real mem  = 1071697920 (1046580K)
avail mem = 969449472 (946728K)
using 4256 buffers containing 53735424 bytes (52476K) of memory
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80clock_battery
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 10/11/05, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xe4bd0 
(33 entries)
bios0: Intel Corporation SE7230NH1LX
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: battery life expectancy 0%
apm0: AC off, battery charge unknown, estimated 0:00 hours
apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1
pcibios at bios0 function 0x1a not configured
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000 0xcb000/0x2400
acpi at mainbus0 not configured
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7230 MCH rev 0x00
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
ami0 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Symbios Logic MegaRAID rev 0x01: irq 9
ami0: Intel RAID SRCS16, 64b/lhc, FW 713N, BIOS vG401, 64MB RAM
ami0: 1 channels, 0 FC loops, 1 logical drives
scsibus0 at ami0: 40 targets
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: AMI, Host drive #00,  SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd0: 312804MB, 312804 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 640622592 sec total
scsibus1 at ami0: 16 targets
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 Intel 82801G PCIE rev 0x01
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
em0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E) rev 0x03: irq 10, 
address 00:16:76:94:e8:34
pciide0 at pci4 dev 0 function 2 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x108d rev 
0x03: DMA (unsupported), channel 0 wired to native-PCI, channel 1 wired to native-PCI
pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide0: channel 0 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?)
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?)
Intel 82573E AMT rev 0x03 at pci4 dev 0 function 3 not configured
Intel 82573E KCS (Active Management) rev 0x03 at pci4 dev 0 function 4 not 
configured
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2
uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 9
usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3
uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub4 at usb4
uhub4: Intel EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered
ppb4 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA AGP rev 0xe1
pci5 at ppb4 bus 5
vga1 at pci5 dev 4 function 0 ATI ES1000 rev 0x02
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
em1 at pci5 dev 5 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq 10, 
address 00:16:76:94:e8:35
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801GB LPC rev 0x01: PM disabled
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801GB IDE rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 
configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus2 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus2 targ 0 lun 0: LITE-ON, DVDRW SHM-165P6S, MS0M SCSI0 5/cdrom 
removable
cd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 4
pciide1: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide2 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801GB SATA rev 0x01: DMA, channel 0 
configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide2: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt
ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 82801GB SMBus rev 0x01: irq 11
iic0 at ichiic0
adt0 at iic0 addr 0x2c: emc6d100 rev 0x68
adt1 at iic0 addr 0x2d: lm96000 rev 0x68
adt2 at iic0 addr 0x2e: emc6d100 rev 0x68
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5

Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Artur Grabowski
Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so, well. -this 
  list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite 
  google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how long will it 
  last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do have an old 
  host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm sure there are 
  those on this list with longer.
 
 First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but thanks. Secondly, I
 think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage time which says
 what kind of machine you have.
 
 You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not some bragbox) says
 what kind of software and hardware stresses have been going. I've got over
 5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all pf,
 spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.


# uptime
 6:45PM  up 9136 days,  5:29, 1 user, load averages: 0.26, 0.12, 0.09

I win.

http://www.blahonga.org/~art/diffs/epenis-enlargement.20060210

//art



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Gabe
Hard to say. His message had a few different themes in it. 
He spoke about his dedication to the binary machine arts, but then confessed
to using an expensive machine as a door stop?

And, he praises the use he's gotten from OBSD and the list, but then jinxes
it by questioning its direction and bringing up the issue of its lifecycle.

I just wanted to bring up the issue of idle time versus cpu time.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Der Engel
 Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:31 AM
 To: misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
 
 Umnada,
 
 Did you get his point?
 
 On 1/4/07, Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so, 
 well. -this
   list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite
   google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how 
 long will it
   last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do 
 have an old
   host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm 
 sure there are
   those on this list with longer.
 
  First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but 
 thanks. Secondly, I
  think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage 
 time which says
  what kind of machine you have.
 
  You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not 
 some bragbox) says
  what kind of software and hardware stresses have been 
 going. I've got over
  5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all pf,
  spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.



Re: .forward for procmail

2007-01-04 Thread Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sorry, I have been mistaken in the path, I have tryed with the correct
path points to /usr/local/bin/procmail and doesn't work

Anyone?


thanks

- -- 
Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]


.
iD8DBQFFnSy4oZmxoVJRtGIRAnJsAJ0TIl5MEBdl8XwEVGC8c3gOo6ABBACggrB3
BKlXOduoGvPPBiOpNXToMiY=
=zkJK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Umnada Tyrolla
Uh, mask back on (8D)

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Artur Grabowski
 Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:12 AM
 To: Umnada Tyrolla
 Cc: 'Karl R. Balsmeier'; misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
 
 Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so, 
 well. -this 
   list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite 
   google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how 
 long will it 
   last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do 
 have an old 
   host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm 
 sure there are 
   those on this list with longer.
  
  First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but 
 thanks. Secondly, I
  think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage 
 time which says
  what kind of machine you have.
  
  You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not 
 some bragbox) says
  what kind of software and hardware stresses have been 
 going. I've got over
  5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all pf,
  spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.
 
 
 # uptime  
   
  6:45PM  up 9136 days,  5:29, 1 user, load averages: 0.26, 0.12, 0.09
 
 I win.
 
 http://www.blahonga.org/~art/diffs/epenis-enlargement.20060210
 
 //art



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Dan Farrell
'Hard to say'? That response means 'No, I didn't miss his point, I just
want to be a hard-ass and then not really address it.'

He praised the OpenBSD project and those responsible for it... because
it's worth praising.

Can't someone say something nice here without it being picked apart?


I will end on a nice note (call it Leading by Example)... I agree
completely with Karl's comments... OpenBSD rocks.

Ducking,

Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
 Gabe
 Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:37 AM
 To: 'Der Engel'; misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
 
 Hard to say. His message had a few different themes in it.
 He spoke about his dedication to the binary machine arts, but then
 confessed
 to using an expensive machine as a door stop?
 
 And, he praises the use he's gotten from OBSD and the list, but then
 jinxes
 it by questioning its direction and bringing up the issue of its
 lifecycle.
 
 I just wanted to bring up the issue of idle time versus cpu time.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Der Engel
  Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:31 AM
  To: misc@openbsd.org
  Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
 
  Umnada,
 
  Did you get his point?
 
  On 1/4/07, Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so,
  well. -this
list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite
google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how
  long will it
last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do
  have an old
host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm
  sure there are
those on this list with longer.
  
   First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but
  thanks. Secondly, I
   think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage
  time which says
   what kind of machine you have.
  
   You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not
  some bragbox) says
   what kind of software and hardware stresses have been
  going. I've got over
   5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all
pf,
   spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.



SUN Fire x2200, anyone?

2007-01-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello,

I'm thinking about using a SUN Fire x2200 M2 as a combo style
firewall machine, but could not find any experiences with it. The
machine looks nice on paper, but the things stated about the x2100
(integrated RAID) were generally not so encouraging. So I thought I'd
better ask...


Best,
--Toni++



Re: SUN Fire x2200, anyone?

2007-01-04 Thread Jack J. Woehr
On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:

 I'm thinking about using a SUN Fire x2200 M2 as a combo style
 firewall machine, but could not find any experiences with it.

I've got an x2100 currently out of commission. If I can bring it up
in the next week, I'll toss OBSD on it and see what happens and
post back to the list.

-- 
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303-443-7000 ext. 527



Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad

2007-01-04 Thread Umnada Tyrolla
 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:34 PM
 To: Gabe; Der Engel; misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: RE: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
 
 'Hard to say'? That response means 'No, I didn't miss his 
 point, I just
 want to be a hard-ass and then not really address it.'
 

I'm not avoiding the issue of ridiculous hyperbole or opensource project
skepticism.


 He praised the OpenBSD project and those responsible for it... because
 it's worth praising.
 

Riight. About both parts.

 Can't someone say something nice here without it being picked apart?
 

The converse: Can something be picked apart even though it is not nice?
The Nile isn't just a river in Egypt.

 
 I will end on a nice note (call it Leading by Example)... I agree
 completely with Karl's comments... OpenBSD rocks.
 

Werd.

 Ducking,
 

Word.

 Dan Farrell
 Applied Innovations
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of
  Gabe
  Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:37 AM
  To: 'Der Engel'; misc@openbsd.org
  Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
  
  Hard to say. His message had a few different themes in it.
  He spoke about his dedication to the binary machine arts, but then
  confessed
  to using an expensive machine as a door stop?
  
  And, he praises the use he's gotten from OBSD and the list, but then
  jinxes
  it by questioning its direction and bringing up the issue of its
  lifecycle.
  
  I just wanted to bring up the issue of idle time versus cpu time.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   On Behalf Of Der Engel
   Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:31 AM
   To: misc@openbsd.org
   Subject: Re: OBSD: OS Of The Rad
  
   Umnada,
  
   Did you get his point?
  
   On 1/4/07, Umnada Tyrolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I came here to compute, to help inanimate machines do so,
   well. -this
 list, more than any other resource (including my old favorite
 google.com/bsd) got me where I was going.  The OS -how
   long will it
 last?  I hope forever.  But nothing lasts forever.  I do
   have an old
 host that's been up for 1,248 days without reboot, i'm
   sure there are
 those on this list with longer.
   
First of all, not everyone likes to share how long, but
   thanks. Secondly, I
think it's not the duration of up-time but rather cpu usage
   time which says
what kind of machine you have.
   
You know what I mean? CPU usage (on a user machine, not
   some bragbox) says
what kind of software and hardware stresses have been
   going. I've got over
5,961,600 seconds of cpu usage on this machine. And it's not all
 pf,
spamassassin and mplayer. Not all.



ipsecctl problems again

2007-01-04 Thread viq

On the almost-latest snapshots ipsecctl kept dumping core on me when
trying to start up the VPN, right now on the newest snapshot available
it doesn't, but only IPv6 traffic gets encapsulated.
Both boxes are:
OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1332: Wed Jan  3 21:24:57 MST 2007
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC

Router ipsec.conf:
ike passive esp from any to any \
   main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes group modp2048 \
   quick auth hmac-ripemd160 enc aes group modp2048 \
   srcid [EMAIL PROTECTED] dstid [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Laptop ipsec.conf:
ike dynamic esp from egress to any peer keibi.viq.ath.cx \
   main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes group modp2048 \
   quick auth hmac-ripemd160 enc aes group modp2048 \
   srcid [EMAIL PROTECTED] dstid [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
viq



Re: SUN Fire x2200, anyone?

2007-01-04 Thread Henning Brauer
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-04 18:58]:
 I'm thinking about using a SUN Fire x2200 M2 as a combo style
 firewall machine, but could not find any experiences with it. The
 machine looks nice on paper, but the things stated about the x2100
 (integrated RAID) were generally not so encouraging. So I thought I'd
 better ask...

huh? the x2100s are nice machines, and everything works as expected.

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



NIS and DNS

2007-01-04 Thread Gustavo Rios

Dear list members,

i have reading Makefiles for building nis databases and realized there
is an option -b for allowing hostnames to be retrieved from DNS.

Correct me if i am wrong but i understand all hostname spaces are made
available for each of the nis domains one is managing after enabling
such option. After managing to have yp lookuing up hostnames on DNS
what would it be the rationale behind using netgroups for managing
hostnames after they all have been made available through DNS usage.

Thanks in advance.



compiling tools

2007-01-04 Thread Chuck Robey
This is my first post to a OpenBSD list, so please, if I make any
mistake, go on and correct me,  I will take anything constructively
(like, am I hitting the right list, or the best list for my topic, or
violating any rules, such as having longish lines, which I am trying
hard to avoid using this Seamonkey editor).


OK, I have a fair amount of experience with FreeBSD kernels, but none
using OpenBSD.  My platform is a teeny little Zaurus, and I am trying
to see if I could use some tools such as ccache to speed compilation.
I think that the best way for me to use ccache is to be able to
revector the CC and C++ compilers ... but I'm not certain, could I just
put something like

make CC=ccache build

as my main compilation command (after, of course, I do the dependencies)
and get the compioler revectored to my ccache tool?

Other than that, the only thing I have done is to remotely nfs mount src
and obj directories onto a big server machine, and have that machine
handle my cvs completely remotely, but my real question is abount using
cache, or any other suggestion you could toss at me.

Thanks!



Re: User authentication

2007-01-04 Thread Gustavo Rios

Do you have it working with openbsd too ? I mean for replacing NIS!

If not, is there a NIS server that uses openldap as backend for its
data ? Is it open source?
Wouldn't it be an interesting approach ?

Thanks in advance.

On 1/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 09:18 PM 1/4/2007 +0100, Diego . wrote:
Hello,

I'm new on this list, and use openbsd since 3.8. And now i'm pretty deciced
to make it my main server os at work. But i got a question about user
authentication.

At work all machines are linux machines, and we got 3 windows machines.
Network on my work is getting bigger, so i wonder what should be the best
way to make centralized user authentication ( including gruops, logon
scripts, and some file sharing like home dir ).

I know about nis+nfs,

OpenLDAP is the best repository, .. it does work with the current version
of Samba. We're actually implementing it here for mail users, but have not
finished the production version.

 Lee




qemu support for OpenBSD as a guest on sparc, mips, mipsel, arm, ppc, amd64

2007-01-04 Thread Siju George

Hi,

May I know if people have tried out OpenBSD on the following qemu
hardware emulators?

qemu-system-arm
qemu-system-mipsel
qemu-system-sparc
qemu-system-mips
qemu-system-ppc
qemu-system-x86_64

I wanted to have an experience  of OpenBSD on hardware other than x86 and amd64.
SIMH provided a way to experience VAX :-)

Just would like to know if other platforms are supported as well
before I download the ftp install CD/floppy image.

will the SGI port run under mips/mipsel?

Thankyou so much :-)

kind regards

Siju



Re: SUN Fire x2200, anyone?

2007-01-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi,

On Thu, 04.01.2007 at 22:04:34 +0100, Marc Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 yes henning, the x2100 are nice machines, but the x2200 are slightly 
 different ;).

yes. Apart from other differences, they have 4 NICs on board, instead
of only two.

 @toni: as you might guess, the hardware raid of the nforce chipset 
 doesn't work as hardware raid (except under w2k3 with the driver and 
 maybe under solaris, which i don't have installed).

These are my main concerns: Will the hardware raid do any good in the
x2200 series, and/or what's the current status with respect to the
serial console? SAS is ok if that makes a difference.


Best,
--Toni++



Re: User authentication

2007-01-04 Thread L. V. Lammert

At 07:20 PM 1/4/2007 -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:

Do you have it working with openbsd too ? I mean for replacing NIS!


We don't use it for server authentication - our admin crew is small enough 
that we actually use standard logins.


LDAP is the perfect tool for user services like Samba, Email, and web (our 
applications). Combine LDAP  Samba to participate in AD, so that's also a 
godsend for Windoze shops.



If not, is there a NIS server that uses openldap as backend for its
data ? Is it open source?
Wouldn't it be an interesting approach ?


I doubt that would be a good approach - NIS itself is pretty insecure.

We have not yet encountered an application that would benefit from LDAP as 
server authentication, .. as all 'user level' services we encounter already 
have LDAP authentication modules.


Lee



Re: User authentication

2007-01-04 Thread Diego .
Jacob, your aproach is interesting. I will take a look at this.

Gustavo,  well i'm looking for something to avoid have two differents
servers ( samba and nfs ). But, maybe this one is the easiest way.

What about login scripts? is it posible?

thanks

On 1/4/07, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Do you have it working with openbsd too ? I mean for replacing NIS!

 If not, is there a NIS server that uses openldap as backend for its
 data ? Is it open source?
 Wouldn't it be an interesting approach ?

 Thanks in advance.

 On 1/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  At 09:18 PM 1/4/2007 +0100, Diego . wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I'm new on this list, and use openbsd since 3.8. And now i'm pretty
 deciced
  to make it my main server os at work. But i got a question about user
  authentication.
  
  At work all machines are linux machines, and we got 3 windows machines.
  Network on my work is getting bigger, so i wonder what should be the
 best
  way to make centralized user authentication ( including gruops, logon
  scripts, and some file sharing like home dir ).
  
  I know about nis+nfs,
 
  OpenLDAP is the best repository, .. it does work with the current
 version
  of Samba. We're actually implementing it here for mail users, but have
 not
  finished the production version.
 
   Lee



Re: User authentication

2007-01-04 Thread L. V. Lammert

At 11:06 PM 1/4/2007 +0100, Diego . wrote:


What about login scripts? is it posible?


If you DID wish to use OpenLDAP for OBSD user authentication, it seems to 
be possible via Kerberos/heimdal:


http://www.pdc.kth.se/heimdal/heimdal.html

See the section on 'Using LDAP to store the database'.

HTH,

Lee



Re: Anone using A8V-VM mother board on OpenBSD 4.0/amd64 and getting proper sound output?

2007-01-04 Thread Chris Cappuccio
azalia seems to default to 50% volume for some reason on my nvidia chipset
amd64 board.

so, i actually have this in my rc.local at home:

mixerctl -w outputs.mix0c=255,255

you could try turning all your outputs to max volume, since they all appear
to be 50% or less.  that way you could figure out which one is the master
and which one controls the userland audio output and so forth.  you can
also you could read the azalia driver to see if any comments or source
code might explain more of the choices it makes.

finally you could try running X11 and aumix, and then watch mixerctl -a to see
which values it decides to change (this assumes aumix has any clue of what to
do with all these sysctls)

$ mixerctl -a
record.adc08.mute=off
record.adc08=123,123
record.adc09.mute=off
record.adc09=123,123
inputs.mix0b.pink18.mu=off
inputs.mix0b.pink19.mu=off
inputs.mix0b.blue1a.mu=off
inputs.mix0b.green1b.m=off
inputs.mix0b.unknown1c=off
inputs.mix0b.unknown1d=off
inputs.mix0b.green14.m=off
inputs.mix0b.gray15.mu=off
inputs.mix0b.black16.m=off
inputs.mix0b.orange17.=off
inputs.mix0b.pink18=123,123
inputs.mix0b.pink19=123,123
inputs.mix0b.blue1a=123,123
inputs.mix0b.green1b=123,123
inputs.mix0b.unknown1c=123,123
inputs.mix0b.unknown1d=123
inputs.mix0b.green14=123,123
inputs.mix0b.gray15=123,123
inputs.mix0b.black16=123,123
inputs.mix0b.orange17=123,123
outputs.mix0c=255,255
inputs.mix0c.dac02.mut=off
inputs.mix0c.mix0b.mut=off
outputs.mix0d=123,123
inputs.mix0d.dac03.mut=off
inputs.mix0d.mix0b.mut=off
outputs.mix0e=123,123
inputs.mix0e.dac04.mut=off
inputs.mix0e.mix0b.mut=off
outputs.mix0f=123,123
inputs.mix0f.dac05.mut=off
inputs.mix0f.mix0b.mut=off
outputs.green14.source=mix0c
outputs.green14.mute=off
outputs.green14=85,85
outputs.green14.dir=output
outputs.green14.boost=off
outputs.gray15.source=mix0d
outputs.gray15.mute=off
outputs.gray15=85,85
outputs.gray15.dir=output
outputs.gray15.boost=off
outputs.black16.source=mix0e
outputs.black16.mute=off
outputs.black16=85,85
outputs.black16.dir=output
outputs.black16.boost=off
outputs.orange17.source=mix0f
outputs.orange17.mute=off
outputs.orange17=85,85
outputs.orange17.dir=output
outputs.orange17.boost=off
outputs.pink18.source=mix0c
outputs.pink18.mute=off
outputs.pink18=85,85
outputs.pink18.dir=input
outputs.pink18.boost=off
outputs.pink19.source=mix0c
outputs.pink19.mute=off
outputs.pink19=85,85
outputs.pink19.dir=input
outputs.pink19.boost=off
outputs.blue1a.source=mix0c
outputs.blue1a.mute=off
outputs.blue1a=85,85
outputs.blue1a.dir=input
outputs.blue1a.boost=off
outputs.green1b.source=mix0c
outputs.green1b.mute=off
outputs.green1b=85,85
outputs.green1b.dir=output
outputs.green1b.boost=off
inputs.mix22.pink18.mu=off
inputs.mix22.pink19.mu=off
inputs.mix22.blue1a.mu=off
inputs.mix22.green1b.m=off
inputs.mix22.unknown1c=off
inputs.mix22.unknown1d=off
inputs.mix22.green14.m=off
inputs.mix22.gray15.mu=off
inputs.mix22.black16.m=off
inputs.mix22.orange17.=off
inputs.mix22.mix0b.mut=off
inputs.mix23.pink18.mu=off
inputs.mix23.pink19.mu=off
inputs.mix23.blue1a.mu=off
inputs.mix23.green1b.m=off
inputs.mix23.unknown1c=off
inputs.mix23.unknown1d=off
inputs.mix23.green14.m=off
inputs.mix23.gray15.mu=off
inputs.mix23.black16.m=off
inputs.mix23.orange17.=off
inputs.mix23.mix0b.mut=off
outputs.mix26=123,123
inputs.mix26.dac25.mut=off
inputs.mix26.mix0b.mut=off
inputs.usingdac=02040305
record.usingadc=08


Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am able to hear only very low sound using the A8V-VM motherboard on
 OpenBSD 4.0/amd64.
 Could Somebody help me troubleshoot it please?
 Details below
 
 This mail had already reached misc@ in another form during the holidays.
 Couldn't find much help :-(
 Just wondering if this board is a little unsupported :-(
 
 Thankyou so much :-)
 
 kind regards
 
 Siju
 
 =
 $ mixerctl -a
 outputs.dac02.source=hdaudio
 inputs.dac03.mute=off
 inputs.dac03=123,123
 inputs.dac04.mute=off
 inputs.dac04=123,123
 inputs.dac05.mute=off
 inputs.dac05=123,123
 outputs.mix09.mute=off
 inputs.mix09.dac04.mut=off
 inputs.mix09.dac05.mut=off
 inputs.sel0a.source=mix07
 inputs.sel0b.source=mix07
 inputs.sel0c.source=dac04
 inputs.sel0d.source=dac05
 inputs.sel0e.source=mix08
 inputs.sel0f.source=pink1f
 outputs.sel0f=85,85
 inputs.sel10.source=blue20
 inputs.sel11.source=sel0f
 inputs.sel12.source=sel11
 outputs.sel12.mute=off
 outputs.sel12=119,119
 outputs.sel13.mute=off
 outputs.sel13=123,123
 outputs.sel14.mute=off
 outputs.sel14=123
 outputs.sel15.mute=off
 outputs.sel15=123,123
 outputs.sel16.mute=off
 outputs.sel16=123,123
 outputs.sel17.mute=off
 outputs.sel17=123,123
 inputs.sel18.source=beep19
 outputs.sel18.mute=on
 outputs.sel18=119
 outputs.green1a.mute=off
 outputs.green1a=123,123
 outputs.green1a.boost=on
 outputs.green1b.mute=off
 outputs.green1b=123,123
 outputs.green1b.boost=off
 outputs.blue1c.mute=off
 outputs.blue1c=123,123
 outputs.blue1c.dir=output
 

Re: User authentication

2007-01-04 Thread Gustavo Rios

Could it be OpenAFS ?

On 1/4/07, Diego . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jacob, your aproach is interesting. I will take a look at this.

Gustavo,  well i'm looking for something to avoid have two differents
servers ( samba and nfs ). But, maybe this one is the easiest way.

What about login scripts? is it posible?

thanks

On 1/4/07, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have it working with openbsd too ? I mean for replacing NIS!

 If not, is there a NIS server that uses openldap as backend for its
 data ? Is it open source?
 Wouldn't it be an interesting approach ?

 Thanks in advance.

 On 1/4/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  At 09:18 PM 1/4/2007 +0100, Diego . wrote:
  Hello,
  
  I'm new on this list, and use openbsd since 3.8. And now i'm pretty
deciced
  to make it my main server os at work. But i got a question about user
  authentication.
  
  At work all machines are linux machines, and we got 3 windows machines.
  Network on my work is getting bigger, so i wonder what should be the
best
  way to make centralized user authentication ( including gruops, logon
  scripts, and some file sharing like home dir ).
  
  I know about nis+nfs,
 
  OpenLDAP is the best repository, .. it does work with the current
version
  of Samba. We're actually implementing it here for mail users, but have
not
  finished the production version.
 
   Lee




Re: qemu support for OpenBSD as a guest on sparc, mips, mipsel, arm, ppc, amd64

2007-01-04 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:08:47AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
 Hi,
 
 May I know if people have tried out OpenBSD on the following qemu
 hardware emulators?
 
 qemu-system-arm
 qemu-system-mipsel
 qemu-system-sparc
 qemu-system-mips
 qemu-system-ppc
 qemu-system-x86_64
 
 I wanted to have an experience  of OpenBSD on hardware other than x86 and 
 amd64.
 SIMH provided a way to experience VAX :-)
 
 Just would like to know if other platforms are supported as well
 before I download the ftp install CD/floppy image.
 
 will the SGI port run under mips/mipsel?

I don't know about any of those, in particular I don't know anything
about the SGI port, but an older OpenBSD version (3.8) did work under
qemu's i386 emulation. So it seems worth the trouble to actually check
the others.

Joachim



Re: qemu support for OpenBSD as a guest on sparc, mips, mipsel, arm, ppc, amd64

2007-01-04 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thursday 04 January 2007 13:38, Siju George wrote:
 Hi,

 May I know if people have tried out OpenBSD on the following qemu
 hardware emulators?

 qemu-system-arm
 qemu-system-mipsel
 qemu-system-sparc
 qemu-system-mips
 qemu-system-ppc
 qemu-system-x86_64

 I wanted to have an experience  of OpenBSD on hardware other than x86
 and amd64. SIMH provided a way to experience VAX :-)

 Just would like to know if other platforms are supported as well
 before I download the ftp install CD/floppy image.

 will the SGI port run under mips/mipsel?

 Thankyou so much :-)

 kind regards

 Siju


Hi Siju,

Though I haven't played with qemu, it seems you are making a very common 
mistake in your thinking; a complete system is far more than just the 
processor it contains. 

For example, there are tons of different processors in the mips family 
and each one has slight differences. But that is not the real problem 
when it comes to software support. Each *system* which uses any of the 
mips processor also contains many other additional chips which supply 
various functionality like serial ports, hard drive interfaces, types 
of buses for expansion cards and countless other required pieces of 
equipment in the system.

Having software/compiler support for the particular processor used in a 
system is only a step in the right direction but is insufficient for 
operation; you must also have software support (drivers) for the 
additional chips used in the complete system design.

Emulators, like qemu, vmware and similar, normally try to emulate an 
entire system, not just the particular processor. I had to guess, I 
would assume the qemu-system-mips emulator is actually emulating one of 
the old DECstation systems (both the mips CPU *and* the supporting 
chipsets). If my guess is correct, you would want to use the OpenBSD 
PMAX port on it. The PMAX port is no longer maintained due to lack of 
interest but you can still download the old version.

Kind Regards,
JCR



Re: compiling tools

2007-01-04 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:52:53PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
 This is my first post to a OpenBSD list, so please, if I make any
 mistake, go on and correct me,  I will take anything constructively
 (like, am I hitting the right list, or the best list for my topic, or
 violating any rules, such as having longish lines, which I am trying
 hard to avoid using this Seamonkey editor).

Yes, this is the right list; yes, wrapping lines properly is
appreciated, but you seem to have managed; and no, I don't see anything
blatantly idiotic below. AFAIK, that's enough to avoid the flames. ;-)

 OK, I have a fair amount of experience with FreeBSD kernels, but none
 using OpenBSD.  My platform is a teeny little Zaurus, and I am trying
 to see if I could use some tools such as ccache to speed compilation.
 I think that the best way for me to use ccache is to be able to
 revector the CC and C++ compilers ... but I'm not certain, could I just
 put something like
 
 make CC=ccache build
 
 as my main compilation command (after, of course, I do the dependencies)
 and get the compioler revectored to my ccache tool?

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109043549403999w=2 seems
to suggest that putting the appropriate CC= line in /etc/mk.conf might
work; this is not documented in mk.conf(5).
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-portsm=116060629621783w=2
suggests likewise, and points to another possible solution, provided you
have quite a few Zauruses.

However, note that this affects ports *only*. And frankly, I have no
idea what your line above might do. It's not supported, that's for
sure...

 Other than that, the only thing I have done is to remotely nfs mount src
 and obj directories onto a big server machine, and have that machine
 handle my cvs completely remotely, but my real question is abount using
 cache, or any other suggestion you could toss at me.

Yes - there is one big 'why' in all this. ccache is really useful if you
repeatedly rebuild the same thing, and cannot afford to actually rely on
make/the makefiles doing the right thing. However, unless you are going
to do some hefty development work on that Zaurus, which I really
wouldn't recommend, you are unlikely to need to build much of anything
on it.

If you stick to the patch branch, you'd *never* have to compile anything
more than a handful of files; and even if you follow -stable and
periodically rebuild everything, you're not going to need to build that
much.

If, and only if, you wish to follow -current, and the snapshots do not
suffice, using ccache might be a good idea. But only then - and even in
that case, if you're going to be doing unsupported stuff, you *might* be
able to get someone to explain you how to do cross-compilation (I
wouldn't know, for OpenBSD; the FAQ suggests it might be possible in
5.11.13, but it is probably not a good idea, as is pointed out in the
same place.)

Joachim



Re: compiling tools

2007-01-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
  OK, I have a fair amount of experience with FreeBSD kernels, but none
  using OpenBSD.  My platform is a teeny little Zaurus, and I am trying
  to see if I could use some tools such as ccache to speed compilation.

 Yes - there is one big 'why' in all this. ccache is really useful if you
 repeatedly rebuild the same thing, and cannot afford to actually rely on
 make/the makefiles doing the right thing. However, unless you are going
 to do some hefty development work on that Zaurus, which I really
 wouldn't recommend, you are unlikely to need to build much of anything
 on it.

Quite a few things need building from ports on the ARM arch's (zaurus
and armish share packages; building on an N2100 is a reasonably easy
and not horrendously expensive way to speed up builds of software to
run on a Z).

It's a good job some people did some hefty development work on them,
or we wouldn't have OpenBSD/Zaurus which is a pretty useful thing.



Re: SUN Fire x2200, anyone?

2007-01-04 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Toni Mueller wrote on Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0100:
 On Thu, 04.01.2007 at 22:04:34 +0100, Marc Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 @toni: as you might guess, the hardware raid of the nforce chipset 
 doesn't work as hardware raid (except under w2k3 with the driver and 
 maybe under solaris, which i don't have installed).
 
 These are my main concerns: Will the hardware raid do any good in the
 x2200 series, and/or what's the current status with respect to the
 serial console? SAS is ok if that makes a difference.

When building a firewall, also consider that RAID might not be
useful at all, that it might even be better avoided.

If you really need to avoid downtime caused by hardware failures, you
ought to have two carp(4)ed machines, anyway - the disks are not the
only part prone to failure, after all.  When one of the machines fails,
switch it off, swap out the (single) hard disk, install a new one,
reinstall the system and go back to carp.  You are done, without any
downtime whatsoever.  Thus, RAID is not required for avoiding downtime.
What else could it be required for?  Minimizing reinstallation time?
Installing a firewall should be done in less than half an hour,
even much less if you have a good site40.tgz.  And how often do you
expect you will have to do that?  In particular, how often
compared to routine upgrades which have to be done a few times
in each year, anyway?

On the other hand, / on raid can be painful for various reasons.
What else would you want to put on RAID in a firewall?  Well, /var
and /tmp should not be that valuable, so perhaps some user data?
Hopefully, there is none, even if you plan some kind of combo
style - you should probably not combine your firewall with any
server processes handling valuable user data.

RAID can be very useful when building e.g. file servers and various
other devices - firewalls are the typical place where you might
be better off focussing you attention to other parts of the system,
avoiding unnecessary complexity of the hard disk setup.  For more
detailed discussions of this recurring topic, see the archives, in
particular various posts by Nick Holland.



moving kernels between machines

2007-01-04 Thread David Newman

I have two machines:

- Machine A, a single i386 box without enough disk space to unpack the 
source tree


- Machine B, a two-CPU i386 box running bsd.mp with plenty of disk

My questions:

1. For purposes of applying kernel security patches, can I compile a 
patched kernel on Machine B and just transfer it over to Machine A and 
reboot?


2. If the answer to (1) is yes, what if anything do I need to do with 
userland on Machine A? For example, how would I apply patch 001 for 4.0, 
which is just for httpd?


many thanks

dn



Re: moving kernels between machines

2007-01-04 Thread Nick Holland
David Newman wrote:
 I have two machines:
 
 - Machine A, a single i386 box without enough disk space to unpack the 
 source tree
 
 - Machine B, a two-CPU i386 box running bsd.mp with plenty of disk
 
 My questions:
 
 1. For purposes of applying kernel security patches, can I compile a 
 patched kernel on Machine B and just transfer it over to Machine A and 
 reboot?

Of course... :)

 2. If the answer to (1) is yes, what if anything do I need to do with 
 userland on Machine A? For example, how would I apply patch 001 for 4.0, 
 which is just for httpd?

IF you really know exactly what files are altered, build 'em on your
fast, big machine and copy them over to your small machine, making sure
you get permissions and such correct.

IF you do not know for sure which files are altered, I'd suggest just
making your life simple, and follow stable, make a release, and install
that on the small machine (and any others).  When staying with stable,
the process is trivial: unpack all .tgz files (don't forget the 'p'
option!!), install the kernel, reboot.  If your big, fast machine has
some time when no one would notice, you might even want to set it up to
periodically make a -stable release for you (yes, the official
instructions say reboot between building the kernel and the userland,
but since the API doesn't change in -stable, you can almost always get
away without the reboot.  In fact, on my -stable build machine
(actually, a VMware session) at work, I only reboot the thing to make
sure the build is good before installing it on a critical machine.

AGAIN, if you know exactly what subset of things need to be patched,
(for example, httpd), you could just stop and start that one service,
but usually, by the time you have figured that all out, you could have
just rebooted.

See:
  http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html
  http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html , especially sections 5.1, 5.4
  http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet

Nick.
(who runs ONLY enough -release/-stable to verify the upgradeXX.html
instructions are valid)



x2100 M2

2007-01-04 Thread Stephen Schaff
I'm thinking about buying the Sun x2100 M2 for OpenBSD 4.0. I've  
purchased one for a  client that's running linux. I set it up but  
don't admin it. I don't use linux, but I really like the hardware. I  
want to do RAID1 with it, which the motherboard supports. However,  
I'm told that the RAID controllers they put on motherboards are just  
glorified software RAID and don't even compare to real hardware RAID.  
Further, I don't think that OpenBSD would even work with the  
motherboard RAID controller - please correct me if I'm wrong.


So, I'm looking for a suggested course of action regarding the x2100 M2.
Anyone have any experience with it - especially keeping RAID1 in mind?


Best Regards,
Stephen



USB Keyboard lags when caps lock or num lock is pressed under X

2007-01-04 Thread Antti Harri

Hello,

the subject line pretty much tells it. In console everything works okay
except when I do `sudo halt` and it says something like press any key
to reboot. At that point it doesn't accept any input to make it reboot.
It isn't supposed to work like that, is it?

I think this guy [1] had exactly same problem in 2005 regarding the lag
in X.

[1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-01/0788.html

Here's my dmesg, it's snapshot of current:

OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #1332: Wed Jan  3 21:24:57 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 1.90 
GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
real mem  = 804810752 (785948K)
avail mem = 725516288 (708512K)
using 4256 buffers containing 40366080 bytes (39420K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(00) BIOS, date 09/05/03, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdaf0, 
SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0630 (22 entries)
bios0: MSI MS-6590
apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown
apm0: flags 30102 dobusy 0 doidle 1
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0x1
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xf7fb0/240 (13 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:17:0 (VIA VT8237 ISA rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xf800 0xcf800/0x4400! 0xd4000/0x1800
acpi at mainbus0 not configured
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 VIA VT8377 PCI rev 0x80
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 VIA VT8377 AGP rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 rev 0xa1
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
emu0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 Creative Labs SoundBlaster Audigy rev 0x03: 
irq 12
ac97: codec id 0x54524123 (TriTech Microelectronics TR28602)
audio0 at emu0
Creative Labs SoundBlaster Audigy Digital rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 10 function 1 
not configured
Creative Labs Firewire rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 10 function 2 not configured
bge0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 Broadcom BCM5788 rev 0x03, BCM5705 A3 
(0x3003): irq 10, address 00:0c:76:3e:6d:c4
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5705 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2
VIA VT6306 FireWire rev 0x46 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 not configured
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 VIA VT6420 SATA rev 0x80: DMA
pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: ST3250824AS
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
pciide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: ATA133, channel 
0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
pciide1: channel 0 disabled (no drives)
atapiscsi0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: PLEXTOR, DVDR PX-708A, 1.08 SCSI0 5/cdrom 
removable
cd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
uhci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 11
usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 11
usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1
uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 12
usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2
uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci3 at pci0 dev 16 function 3 VIA VT83C572 USB rev 0x81: irq 12
usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3
uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ehci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 4 VIA VT6202 USB rev 0x86: irq 10
usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub4 at usb4
uhub4: VIA EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered
viapm0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 VIA VT8237 ISA rev 0x00
iic0 at viapm0
iic0: addr 0x2f 04=00 06=0b 07=00 0c=00 0d=07 0e=84 0f=00 10=c0 11=10 12=00 
13=60 14=14 15=62 16=01 17=06
isa0 at mainbus0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83697HF
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2
fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec
biomask ff65 netmask ff65 ttymask ffe7
pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
uhidev0 at uhub1 port 2 

Re: x2100 M2

2007-01-04 Thread Dag Richards

Stephen Schaff wrote:
I'm thinking about buying the Sun x2100 M2 for OpenBSD 4.0. I've  
purchased one for a  client that's running linux. I set it up but  don't 
admin it. I don't use linux, but I really like the hardware. I  want to 
do RAID1 with it, which the motherboard supports. However,  I'm told 
that the RAID controllers they put on motherboards are just  glorified 
software RAID and don't even compare to real hardware RAID.  Further, I 
don't think that OpenBSD would even work with the  motherboard RAID 
controller - please correct me if I'm wrong.


So, I'm looking for a suggested course of action regarding the x2100 M2.
Anyone have any experience with it - especially keeping RAID1 in mind?


Best Regards,
Stephen



This has been answered, and quite recently ...
The X2100's work well with OpenBSD 4.0.
The Raid controllers do not, at all.

You can use raidframe to do software raid, though I at least have not 
been able to do an upgrade of a system with its root slices on a

raidframe disk. I am of course one of the less sharp tools on the list.
Still a tool though ... heh heh heh.



Re: qemu support for OpenBSD as a guest on sparc, mips, mipsel, arm, ppc, amd64

2007-01-04 Thread Siju George

On 1/5/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:08:47AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
 Hi,

 May I know if people have tried out OpenBSD on the following qemu
 hardware emulators?

 qemu-system-arm
 qemu-system-mipsel
 qemu-system-sparc
 qemu-system-mips
 qemu-system-ppc
 qemu-system-x86_64

 I wanted to have an experience  of OpenBSD on hardware other than x86 and
 amd64.
 SIMH provided a way to experience VAX :-)

 Just would like to know if other platforms are supported as well
 before I download the ftp install CD/floppy image.

 will the SGI port run under mips/mipsel?

I don't know about any of those, in particular I don't know anything
about the SGI port, but an older OpenBSD version (3.8) did work under
qemu's i386 emulation. So it seems worth the trouble to actually check
the others.



Thankyou so much for your reples J.C and Joachim :-)
I did get the OpenBSD 4.0/ i386 port installed on qemu.
it works fine :-)

kind regards

Siju