Hi all,
Thanks for the replays.
I have my test setup running and for now I am very impressed by OpenBGP
performance.
I have some additional questions.
I use route-maps in my quagga setup, but i do not see this options in
OpenBGP. How can I achieve something similar to this route-map for
Hi Rafael,
Actually, I think maybe creating a release will let me do that, but it
looks like an overkill.
You'll need a second system of the same architecture for that. That's all.
You can then transfer any install set you might need to your production
machine.
And I'll still have to build
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Hi list,
I have a VIA EPIA-CN 1EG board with a C7 CPU and i cannot get
sound to work.
Doing a
# cat anyFile /dev/audio
only produces a high sounding beep, the length of which depends on the
size of the file. Using /dev/sound produces the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nico Meijer wrote:
I think maybe manually patching things will be easier and
faster.
Faster, yes. Easier, depends. It's easier to make mistakes, IMHO.
I recommend release(8)... Nico
Rafael, he has a bad taste of food, but he's right ;)
Hi everyone.
I have a local FTP server that contains many packages. When doing an install
I want my pc to first check this server before going onto the net. I have
set up the following in a shell script on the pc being installed:
LAN_FTP=192.168.3.11
OS_V0=$(uname -r)
On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Group,
I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface
(fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall Other outside firewall
(fxp0)
I want that there should be no
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-07 09:54]:
I use route-maps in my quagga setup, but i do not see this options in
OpenBGP.
not having the route-map desaster was a design goal.
look at the filter language, it can do all you want.
there's a section about it in bgpd.conf(5) (yeah,
i've started looking at spamd to be honest i'm a little confused even
after reading man google. could somebody run a quick check over all of
this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/ this
was a godsend!
scenario:
pf fw running as inet gateway
Hello,
i've started looking at spamd to be honest i'm a little confused
even after reading man google. could somebody run a quick check over
all of this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/
this was a godsend!
scenario:
pf fw running as inet
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
i've started looking at spamd to be honest i'm a little confused
even after reading man google. could somebody run a quick check
over all of this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/
this was a godsend!
scenario:
On 3/7/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone.
I have a local FTP server that contains many packages. When doing an install
I want my pc to first check this server before going onto the net. I have
set up the following in a shell script on the pc being installed:
LAN_FTP=192.168.3.11
since syslog is such a convenient facility for logging, i decided to use
it for a project i'm working on where i collect data. i did notice that
there is no way, on openbsd at least, to disable the compression of
repeated messages, i.e. the last message repeated X times syslog entries.
i went
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 05.03.2007 at 17:48:45 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
have 2 sony SDX3-100C AIT3 100 GB tapes here that have bad blocks and
will not read in our tape changer. i may need to get these sent to a
data recovery shop, but would prefer not to
On 3/7/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/03/07, Ramdas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Group,
I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface
(fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall Other outside
How does the new daylight saving times for the US effect an generic
OpenBSD installation with a US time zone (e.g. US/Central) that has not
been patched with the 009_timezone.patch? Do things change if ntpd is
being used?
Thanks,
Claus
Hi,
today I've tried to install OpenBSD3.9 as a HVM guest on XenEnterprise
3.2Beta (http://www.xensource.com/) and it turned out to work without
severe problems. The rtl8139 emulation seems to work well, though it
gave me one or two watchdog timeouts at the end of the boot process.
Here are
On 3/7/07, Claus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does the new daylight saving times for the US effect an generic
OpenBSD installation with a US time zone (e.g. US/Central) that has not
been patched with the 009_timezone.patch? Do things change if ntpd is
being used?
The timezone data is
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:48:05AM -0500, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
The timezone data is simply a set of dates and times to tell the system when
to switch to/from DST. So without the patch, the system will not make any
changes. Ntpd won't change this, as the DST change occurs on the next level.
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 17:40 +0100, Christoph Peus wrote:
BTW: Though XenEnterprise is a commercial product, there's a free
version with limited features available too.
HVM is not good for non-Windows guests. Without accelerated guest
drivers disk and network I/O is very limited. Xen Enterprise
On 3/7/07, Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:55:10PM -0600, Bill Marquette wrote:
Any reason ath(4) only currently supports 11b mode? Looks like it was
commented out in the driver in September with the comment for now.
Just wondering if we're going to see it
On 3/7/2007 11:05 AM, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
The kernel and ntpd only deal with UTC time. The zoneinfo files deal
with conversion from UTC to local time (including DST).
Great, I'll just have the wrong time being used in the logs, by cron and
the date command. I think I can live with
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 09:25, Claus wrote:
How does the new daylight saving times for the US effect an generic
OpenBSD installation with a US time zone (e.g. US/Central) that has not
been patched with the 009_timezone.patch? Do things change if ntpd is
being used?
I am a bit puzzled by
Le Mercredi 7 Mars 2007 09:39, Nick ! a icrit :
On 3/7/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone.
I have a local FTP server that contains many packages. When doing an
install I want my pc to first check this server before going onto the
net. I have set up the following in a shell
On 3/7/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that works. Except that I get the situation that I want to avoid:
missing dependencies. That's why I want that 2nd FTP site in my PKG_PATH:
parsing postfix-2.3.2
Dependencies for postfix-2.3.2 resolve to: pcre-6.4p1 (todo: pcre-6.4p1)
Error from
If you don't want to download the OpenBSD src
and patch your system all you really need
are the new zoneinfo files:
Look at this article for the details:
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10877-6163042.html
NOTE: The file to download from the ftp site is incorrect,
it should be
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George writes:
It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
you really wanted to know :)
Later...
Greg,
Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)
In my dmesg at one point it says
Siju George writes:
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George writes:
It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
you really wanted to know :)
Later...
Greg,
Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)
Hi Peter,
I have a local FTP server that contains many packages.
When doing an install I want my pc to first check this server
before going onto the net.
Why would you want to do that?
This might be a bad idea in the first place.
Suppose you got some package from a public mirror, and after
Si vous avez des difficultes pour visualiser cette page , cliquez ici
Bonjour,
Dans cette newsletter de mars 2007, que des bonnes nouvelles, nouvelles
fonctionnalitis et musiques ` dicouvrir ! Airtist avance toujours aussi
fort avec une communauti d'artistes et d'internautes qui grandit chaque
Siju George writes:
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George writes:
It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than
you really wanted to know :)
Later...
Greg,
Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)
Didier Wiroth wrote:
scenario:
pf fw running as inet gateway NATs smtp to postfix on different
host. this works just fine but of course receives spam occasionally!
spamd appears to be a drop-on-top of your existing (working) MTA
config - i.e. no changes are required to my pf fw postfix
On 2007/03/08 11:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so now i have (maybe) 1 last problem - i want to pass through the
connections on disk before the spamd rules take place. but my modified
pf.conf won't parse, due to an error. i understand *why* but not how
to set this up correctly. basically
Le Mercredi 7 Mars 2007 16:34, Ingo Schwarze a icrit :
Hi Peter,
I have a local FTP server that contains many packages.
When doing an install I want my pc to first check this server
before going onto the net.
Why would you want to do that?
This might be a bad idea in the first place.
Hi,
On Tue, 06.03.2007 at 12:40:07 +0100, Almir Karic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/5/07, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it depends. My current impression is that if you can get away with
having the TCP stack reject packets w/o spending the effort of running
it through pf, than that's
Im running some throughput testing using OpenBSD as the router OS. Running
the GENERIC.MP kernel im not seeing any system load despite the NIC's generating
about 40 000 interrupts in vmstat.
Running the same test on a GENERIC kernel results in 80% system utilization.
Checking with sysctl
35 matches
Mail list logo
