On May 13, 2007, at 8:44 PM, David Higgs wrote:
I've tried to configure NFS and am nearly all the way there, but it
seems like I've hit a pretty big stumbling block. I've got OpenBSD
4.1-stable (10.0.0.1) with an NFS export of my home directory. I also
have a Windows XP machine (10.0.0.2) and
On May 13, 2007, at 10:02 PM, arnuld wrote:
i have configures X and my /etc/X11/xorg.conf file is same as i have
used on DragonFyBSd and Gentoo, Arch Linux etc. when i do startx on
OpenBSD amd64 4.1 it 1st turns-OFF and then after 2 seconds turns-ON
my monitor *automatically*. i had the same
2007/5/13, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 13/05/07, Landry Breuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to make an old Ultra 10 working in dual-screen/xinerama, with
onboard ati (works fine at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and additional old s3 pci
(detected
by kernel).
As far
On 2007/05/13 23:06, John Nietzsche wrote:
*/5 * * * * /usr/sbin/rdate -4ncva
-c corrects for leap seconds
*/5 * * * * /usr/sbin/rdate -4cva gw |
and here you do it again i.e. you are correcting time coming from a
source which is already
Quoting Ted Unangst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 5/13/07, Alex Holst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I set VertRefresh to 60-60, included a modeline generated by gtf and
disabled DDC, resulting in X being a smartarse (Sure, I can do 60Hz):
can you post the full log somewhere? if you can wait to
Hi again,
And sorry to insist on this I'm really lost.
I read in most webs-docs with rdr rule trafic get redirected to internal
servers and with this and pass rule is enought. But i find myself in a
different scenario, with rdr rule and pass rule packets get redirected to
internal server
(Hurrah for the US health care system!)
You can add `Downunder` to the list, we follow you VERY closely! Hope
you well.
Ioan
Michael W. Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/11 7:29 am
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:11:09PM -0500, James Hartley wrote:
On 5/10/07, Matthew Szudzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/05/13 23:06, John Nietzsche wrote:
*/5 * * * * /usr/sbin/rdate -4ncva
-c corrects for leap seconds
*/5 * * * * /usr/sbin/rdate -4cva gw |
and here you do it again i.e. you are
On 5/11/07, Mark Kettenis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On this years hackathon I'd like to hack more on macppc smp support.
For obvious reasons I cannot bring my own machine. Is there anyone in
the Calgary or Edmonton area that can loan us a dual g4 machine end
may/early june?
Mark
If
Greetings,
I have an isakmpd process that's not letting go of old SADs. While it
doesn't seem to be causing issues with the tunnels, it is causing higher
than normal system utilization. It seems to be occurring on the tunnels
which have multiple subnets defined (e.g. VPNA and VPNB, but not
On 5/12/07, alicornio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
Problems with my webmail. I'm sorry.
Hi all
I can't boot my system after the instalation. My OS can't be finded.
I follow the faq (4.12.2 - My i386 won't boot after install) and nothing
change. But I can boot with CD typing b
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
Hi again,
And sorry to insist on this I'm really lost.
I read in most webs-docs with rdr rule trafic get redirected to internal
servers and with this and pass rule is enought. But i find myself in a
different
No,
There's a firewall with public address, and a server with internal address.
firewall: 1.2.3.4
server: 192.168.1.1
On 5/14/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
Hi again,
And sorry to insist on this
Dear gentleman/madam,
i have installed my openbsd firewall and i am trying to get ftp client
behind working.
It is working nicely. But, when i try to lookup and the nat rules
inserted by ftp-proxy, i get nothing :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pfctl -sn -a '*'
nat-anchor ftp-proxy/* all
nat-anchor neif on
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:12:12PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
On 5/14/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
Hi again,
And sorry to insist on this I'm really lost.
I read in most webs-docs with
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:24:07PM -0300, John Nietzsche wrote:
Dear gentleman/madam,
i have installed my openbsd firewall and i am trying to get ftp client
behind working.
It is working nicely. But, when i try to lookup and the nat rules
inserted by ftp-proxy, i get nothing :
[EMAIL
On 5/13/07, Landry Breuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to make an old Ultra 10 working in dual-screen/xinerama, with
onboard ati (works fine at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and additional old s3 pci
(detected
by kernel).
I've seen on xenocara/driver/Makefile that s3virge driver, which this
TD Canada Trust
Account Suspension
In an effort to protect your EasyWeb TD Canada Trust Online Banking
security. we have suspended your account until such time that it can be
safely restored by you..
We have taken this action because youryour EasyWeb TD Canada Trust online
account may have been
I tried this you told me, and that not works, i get a syntax error
my pf.conf:
#supose 10.0.0.254 is external address..
ext_if=sis0
ext_carp_if=carp1
int_if=rl0
int_carp_if=carp0
nat on carp1 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any - 10.0.0.254
rdr on sis0 inet proto tcp from any to 10.0.0.254 port 80 -
According to pf FAQ:
With passive mode FTP (the default mode with OpenBSD's ftp(1)
client), the client requests that the server pick a random port to
listen on for the data connection. The server informs the client of
the port it has chosen, and the client connects to this port to
transfer the
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can be
passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good enough C
programmer to tease them out of the source.
--
Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simmons Consulting - Network
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can be
passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good enough C
programmer to tease them out of the source.
Unexpectably, these flags are described in the wd(4) manual page.
Miod
On 5/14/07, Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can be
passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good enough C
programmer to tease them out of the source.
man wd?
On 2007/05/14 11:50, Jeff Simmons wrote:
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can be
passed to WD via config?
yes, in wd(4), surprisingly enough.
The flags are used only with controllers that support DMA operations and
mode settings (like some
Alberich de megres wrote:
I tried this you told me, and that not works, i get a syntax error
my pf.conf:
#supose 10.0.0.254 is external address..
ext_if=sis0
ext_carp_if=carp1
int_if=rl0
int_carp_if=carp0
nat on carp1 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any - 10.0.0.254
rdr on sis0 inet proto tcp from
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:57:55AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can be
passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good enough C
programmer to tease them out of the source.
man wd?
That last bit confuses me ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am setting up a new OpenBSD machine in which I want to chroot users. I don't
want to use any of the patching solutions to OpenSSH but want to implement a
real system chroot solution so any user, who is chrooted, is jailed even if he
logs in manually.
I have tried
Rob ,
raising VM_PHYSSEG_MAX to 16 did the trick. I'm running stable 4.1 now.
Thanks a lot for the sound advice !
Regards,
Marcos Laufer
- Original Message -
From: Rob Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install
On Monday 14 May 2007 11:57, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 5/14/07, Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can
be passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good
enough C programmer to tease them out of the source.
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:25:34PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
On 5/14/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:12:12PM +0200, Alberich de megres wrote:
On 5/14/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:41:18PM
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:43:34PM -0300, John Nietzsche wrote:
On 5/14/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:24:07PM -0300, John Nietzsche wrote:
Dear gentleman/madam,
i have installed my openbsd firewall and i am trying to get ftp client
behind
Or, perhaps, the drive is just going bad. I would have
expected errors on installing the os if that were the
case.
We have done a low level disk format using an ultimate
boot cd. Didn't output any errors. Did this on both
drives in the system. Took a very long time.
Then, tried to install
I have a question. Some 64 bit cards (PCI-X?) seem to work in 32 bit
slots (PCI 2.2?). Is this a feature, or am I looking at possible
issues down the road? Specifically, I am trying to build a n old(er)
box, and on a whim (and vague memories about this working), stuck an
em card into it. Box
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:41:33PM -0700, John Mendenhall wrote:
Or, perhaps, the drive is just going bad. I would have
expected errors on installing the os if that were the
case.
We have done a low level disk format using an ultimate
boot cd. Didn't output any errors. Did this on
I have a stateless rule on one of my boxes which was just upgraded from 4.0to
4.1. After the upgrade there were some odd issues that were reported and
after looking into them I tracked the source of the issues down to a rule
that was set not to keep state in pf.conf, but was actually keeping state
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote:
We have done a low level disk format using an ultimate
boot cd. Didn't output any errors. Did this on both
drives in the system. Took a very long time.
Then, tried to install the OS. Received a panic on
installing the comp set,
On Mon, 14 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stateless rule on one of my boxes which was just upgraded from 4.0to
4.1. After the upgrade there were some odd issues that were reported and
after looking into them I tracked the source of the issues down to a rule
that was set not to
On 5/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stateless rule on one of my boxes which was just upgraded from 4.0to
4.1. After the upgrade there were some odd issues that were reported and
after looking into them I tracked the source of the issues down to a rule
that was set not
On 5/14/07, Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 11:57, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 5/14/07, Jeff Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation on the exact functions of the flags that can
be passed to WD via config? I haven't found any, and I'm not a good
* bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-14 21:54]:
I have a question. Some 64 bit cards (PCI-X?) seem to work in 32 bit
slots (PCI 2.2?). Is this a feature, or am I looking at possible
issues down the road? Specifically, I am trying to build a n old(er)
box, and on a whim (and vague memories
Yes, i was receiving file.
But a look as ftp-proxy (8) :
In case of active mode (PORT or EPRT):
rdr from $server to $proxy port $port - $client
pass quick inet proto tcp \
from $server to $client port $port
In case of passive mode (PASV or EPSV):
nat from
I would really recommend against using rdate like this, it jumps the
clock. ntpd skews the clock (makes it run slightly fast or slow until
the time is correct), so you don't miss out on any seconds (which
sometimes skips cron jobs, makes logging more confusing, and can
cause a lot of trouble
Ok! I am really having a bad times playing with ftp-proxy!
It is working, but rules inserted are not showed, like in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pfctl -sn -a 'ftp-proxy/*'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pfctl -sr -a 'ftp-proxy/*'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pfctl -sr -a '*'
scrub out on pppoe0 all max-mss 1452 fragment
On 5/14/07, Ben Calvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 13, 2007, at 8:44 PM, David Higgs wrote:
I've tried to configure NFS and am nearly all the way there, but it
seems like I've hit a pretty big stumbling block. I've got OpenBSD
4.1-stable (10.0.0.1) with an NFS export of my home
Dear gentleman/madam,
some time ago, i reached an internet site on printing information for
unix deployment. There there was information for hundreds of printer
from lots of manufacturers. Including information on how-well was a
given printer supported. Now i have lost such reference (i mean the
On 5/14/07, John Nietzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear gentleman/madam,
some time ago, i reached an internet site on printing information for
unix deployment. There there was information for hundreds of printer
from lots of manufacturers. Including information on how-well was a
given printer
I am trying to set up authpf. I created all the files however i would
like to be able to login and then start authpf instead of having a
separate user for authpf. when ever i try to start authpf after loging
in with ssh i get the below error
May 14 22:03:31 freemon authpf: wrong shell for user
47 matches
Mail list logo
