On 02/08/07, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a gnash-0.8.0 port in -current.
I successfully tested it on youtube the other day!
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
Hi,
Has anyone experimented with a Sun Blade 1000?
I need a new porting machine and a new desktop, so I thought I might
kill 2 birds with one stone.
Is a dual 900 it quick? I call my 1.6GHz i386 slow, especially as I
have to run eclipse. Infact, you cant run java on sparc64 OpenBSD can
you? I
On 8/1/07, Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
With the dependency of some packages on the expat XML parser f in
xbase42.tgz, you really cannot some install somel binary snaphots
packages when xbase42.tgz isn't there
[snip]
Aaahhh! That's why i cannot install bash under
Hi Stuart,
On 02/08/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Edd, this will be slightly random, but hope it helps a bit..!
On 2007/08/02 11:41, Edd Barrett wrote:
Has anyone experimented with a Sun Blade 1000?
Not as such, my sparc64 are slower (netra t1), netras are a bit noisy
Hey List,
I've testing the installation after reading this thread on my ibook G4
(Mid 2005) and the installation in current faild by the devel/boost
port.
It ist not sooo important for me, because of the lack of nice color on
X but it would be funny.
bye Konrad
=== gnash-0.8.0p0 depends on:
* Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-02 13:30]:
Is a dual 900 it quick?
I call my 1.6GHz i386 slow, especially as I have to run eclipse.
No SMP yet for sparc64; if it takes half as long to do stuff as
440MHz netra it would still be pretty damn slow.
Doh.
you can't compare speed by
Hi,
Has anyone experimented with a Sun Blade 1000?
I need a new porting machine and a new desktop, so I thought I might
kill 2 birds with one stone.
Is a dual 900 it quick? I call my 1.6GHz i386 slow, especially as I
have to run eclipse. Infact, you cant run java on sparc64 OpenBSD can
you? I
I'm having issues pruning my pfstat.db file. doing a ls -al shows
that this file gets respectable in size fairly quickly (I noticed it
around 200M). The manpage states running pfstat -t 31:365 or
something similar should keep things largely under control. I
dutifully added that line to my
Redirected as this is a misc@ question not a tech@ question.
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:48 +0930, Hugo van Niekerk wrote:
Hey Everybody
Im running OpenBSD 3.9. At startup during vlan initialization I get
an error that the vlan initiated with a nonstandard mtu of 1946
(parent pcn1). Of
On 2007/08/02 10:54, Tim Donahue wrote:
Redirected as this is a misc@ question not a tech@ question.
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:48 +0930, Hugo van Niekerk wrote:
Im running OpenBSD 3.9. At startup during vlan initialization I get
Unfortunately lacking a dmesg...
an error that the vlan
On 2007/08/02 15:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't compare speed by just looking at the MHz.
hence my 'if' which I would have expanded upon had I not
been writing a quick off-list message.
A most instructive example where the old sun4m
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't compare speed by just looking at the MHz.
A most instructive example where the old sun4m machines, where
according to the SPEC figures an SS20 with a 75 MHz SuperSPARC SM71
CPU module was about three times as fast as an SS5 with a 70 MHz
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
(however, due to following -current, not with uptimes 10 days).
today it crashed twice when i had two torrents active (not very big
ones, one 900MByte and one 1300MByte in size -- i did use this machine
for far bigger
hi,
maybe this is somewhat connected to kernel/5496 and kernel/5517?
i'll apply the patch and track this issue. any hints appreciated.
thanks,
timo
Edd Barrett wrote:
On 01/08/07, Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You changed 'xdm_flags=NO' to 'xdm_flags=' in /etc/rc.conf(8),
didn't you? At least that's the standard way to enable xdm(1).
And all this time I have been editting /etc/ttys :P
You learn something new every day.
Well,
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
(however, due to following -current, not with uptimes 10 days).
today it crashed twice when i had two torrents active (not very big
ones, one 900MByte and one 1300MByte
What does df -i show? maybe you filled up a disk or ran out of inodes?
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
(however, due to following -current, not with uptimes 10 days).
today it crashed twice when i had
Can someone give me a recc. for a DVD burner that they have had
success burning and reading discs on under amd64? I have one that is
throwing up errors (scsi read toc commands fail) when trying to read
is9660 DVDs and in order to figure out what is going wrong, I would
like to have a known good
thus xSAPPYx spake:
What does df -i show? maybe you filled up a disk or ran out of inodes?
no, the hard drives are barely used; maximum inodes used is 15% (on /);
the rest is way lower than 10%.
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for
On 8/2/07, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
(however, due to following -current, not with uptimes 10 days).
today it crashed twice when i had two torrents
Le Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:55:44PM -0400, Jean Raby ecrivait :
I had several similar cases with an Apple macmini (i386), also
running a couple of rtorrent instances.
Needless to say, there is no serial console on this box...
so i didn't see the pagedaemon: deadlock detected msg, but the
I have my OpenBSD 4.0 system setup with root on RAID-1 and every
mounted filesystem is also RAID-1 using the raidframe subsystem in the
OpenBSD kernel. THe major problem is that after booting from an
improper shutdown, the system will not attempt to mount any
filesystems until the RAID-1 parity
On 8/2/07, Markus Lude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:55:51PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
I'm reporting that I've got Gnash-0.8
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/) working on OpenBSD.
gnash in the ports tree was updated to 0.8.0 a few weeks ago. What isn't
working
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=== gnash-0.8.0p0 depends on: boost-headers-* - not found
=== Verifying install for boost-headers-* in devel/boost
=== Faking installation for boost_1_33_1
install -c -s -o root -g bin -m 555
On 8/2/07, Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=== gnash-0.8.0p0 depends on: boost-headers-* - not found
=== Verifying install for boost-headers-* in devel/boost
=== Faking installation for boost_1_33_1
install -c -s -o root -g bin -m 555
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 on amd64, and I'm seeing that isakmpd builds
up a large amount of redundant phase 1 tunnels for one of our peers.
It will only report these when prompted with 'echo r \
isakmpd.fifo', it's not shown in 'ipsecctl -s all'. This is causing
one of our peer VPN endpoints to
Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:23:59PM +0200, Sven Ulland wrote:
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 on amd64, and I'm seeing that isakmpd builds
up a large amount of redundant phase 1 tunnels for one of our peers.
It will only report these when prompted with 'echo r \
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:23:59PM +0200, Sven Ulland wrote:
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 on amd64, and I'm seeing that isakmpd builds
up a large amount of redundant phase 1 tunnels for one of our peers.
It will only report these when prompted with 'echo r \
isakmpd.fifo', it's not shown in
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:23:59PM +0200, Sven Ulland wrote:
I'm very (that's putting it mildly) interested in the issues with 4.0
that you mention. Would you be able to shed some more light on which
issues they were, or point me to references? It would be most
interesting.
I'm not sure, but
I've had good luck with the Sony NEC Optiarc Model 7170A-0B.
It's cheap too ($30 from newegg).
- todd
Hi,
On 02/08/07, David Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
filesystems until the RAID-1 parity is rebuilt which takes about 3hrs
on my system with a 160GB and 200GB RAID-1 arrays.
Yup, the reason I use rsync at intervals instead of raidframe.
My house had a phase of having power cuts a lot and I got
Read this...
http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/doc/raidadmin/http://www.packetmischief
.ca/openbsd/
Hernan
www.bsderos.com.ar
On 8/2/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 02/08/07, David Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
filesystems until the RAID-1 parity is rebuilt which takes
On 2007/07/31 22:01, Tom Cosgrove wrote:
Short version:
PLEASE TRY RUNNING WITH THIS DIFF.
note that it's userland, no need for kernel compiles and reboots.
snip src=http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=118591901730067q=raw;
On 7/28/07, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two spare SATA drives on an OpenBSD 4.1 box and would like to set
up RAID level 1.
Tips on documentation, HOWTOs or notes of any kind would be great since
the search engines are rather useless for technical documentation. Some
pages
34 matches
Mail list logo
