My dhcp server is running amd64/4.3-stable, GENERIC kernel.
Clients on 192.168.250.0/23 use the tftp-server-name option. When
dhcpd starts, the first request from that subnet gets all parameters
correctly; all subsequent requests, whether from the same client or
other clients, receive all
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, using 4.2.
Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems
to have a problem.
I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara
don't go any further
Hi there,
I found out that you have tested successfully OpenBSD 4.2 guest on qemu Linux,
I have problems running OpenBSD 4.2 on Linux qemu and i have attached
the result in this letter.
Can you help me?
Thank you in advance for your time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virt]# ./run.sh
Could not open
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
now). A Free
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Jon wrote:
o;?
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
Ehh, it's a bit rewriting history to call the vt line dumb
terminals. vt terminals were considered
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, using 4.2.
Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems
to have a problem.
I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara, cleaned the /usr/xobj/* dir
and set a DESTDIR. As root, I runed
This appears to be a qemu error and is probably best posted on the
qemu-users mailing list.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Boril Boyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
I found out that you have tested successfully OpenBSD 4.2 guest on qemu
Linux,
I have problems running OpenBSD 4.2 on
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 13:23 +0300, Lars Noodin wrote:
It seems from the messages, and my limited
experience, that many come to OpenBSD from other systems where messing
with the kernel is both required and expected[1], that includes Linux
and FreeBSD.
[1] Case in point see AFS client
Matthieu Herrb escribis:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, using 4.2.
Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems
to have a problem.
I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara, cleaned the /usr/xobj/* dir
and set a
xavier brinon escribis:
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, using 4.2.
Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org
http://ftp.openbsd.org and it seems
to have a problem.
I untared the
Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am referring to the old hardware dumb terminals, which had the vt320
standards etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application
that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated
07.06.08, 21:04, Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I tested wuth very simply topology: just 2 pc's and switch
One OpenBSD another Linux with web server.
Now I have only one line in my pf.conf:
scrub all max-mss 1400 fragment reassemble
This
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:06 AM, B A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bash-3.2# pfctl -sr
scrub all no-df random-id max-mss 1400 fragment reassemble
pass in quick all flags S/SA keep state
pass out quick all flags S/SA keep state
Ok. Here is openbsd tcpdump. But I still see len 1440 packets.
Hello,
Reyk Floeter mentioned in his ONLamp interview (link below) that snmpd
currently
supports
most of the SNMPv1/v2c MIBs, IP-MIB, BRIDGE-MIB, HOST-RESOURCES-MIB, IF-MIB,
and
the OPENBSD-SENSORS-MIB
Hi,
I apologize to replying to myself. I am just trying to
provide more info about my question so that maybe someone
will be able to give an answer.
1)
I wanted to run the new version of spamd (with the up to
date sync protocol) without having to upgrade to CURRENT.
I guess I can not or should
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1).
The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as xterm, would be
more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who peddles a
terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be
The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1).
The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as xterm,
would be more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who
peddles a terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be
locked up indefinitely. :-)
Hello,
I'm attempting to get a Western Digital My Book Studio Edition II
working with my OpenBSD 4.2 machine. The drive is formatted for FAT32
and functions while the machine is booted into Windows.
I have it attached via USB, but when I attempt to mount the drive, it
fails:
% sudo mount -t
Nick Holland wrote:
The biggest reasons to do this are because you have too much
time on your hands, and you want to impress people by having
things break, then you swoop in to rescue everyone from your
fabricated disaster.
Actually I think most people do it because you are tought to do so
Hi,
as mentioned in the title libstdc++.so is not in the iso, nor in comp43.
Fulvio
gnome-terminal, and compiz with the blur effect heavily applied, no
scrollbar and window decorations which cast large shadows and match the
transparency and color of your terminal atop a very busy desktop
background, is where it's at.
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:42 -0700, Unix Fan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:34:51PM +0200, fulvio ciriaco wrote:
Hi,
as mentioned in the title libstdc++.so is not in the iso, nor in comp43.
Fulvio
$ tar ztf base43.tgz | grep libstdc
./usr/lib/libstdc++.so.44.1
Which snapshot on which arch do you use? Snapshot from June 7th here on
sparc64.
On Thursday 05 June 2008 15.42.37 you wrote:
On 2008-06-05, Per-Olov Sjvholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server from
OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std install, but a stable update
of kernel and userland from May 29.
The
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting Howl in debug mode
seems to indicate that it's sending the multicast packets to somewhere I
can't explain - 224.0.0.251.
224.0.0.251 is the multicast address for mDNS.
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
The nmeaattach command has been removed in -current, so has the
nmeaattach_flags option in /etc/rc.conf (replaced with ldattach_flags).
Please note that ldattach(8) has a slightly different synopsis than
Hello everybody,
I fully agree with Daniel, here we've correct values.
May i suggest (in order to clarify situation) we use the same host/IP
during exchanges (because it's a bit difficult to diagnose what's
happening0) :-)
Precedent message was between OpenBSD/Linux (IP were
10.137.8.104 -
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in
short why this change was made?
* James Hartley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in
short why this change was made?
we do not want
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, James Hartley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in
short why this change was
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in
short why this change was made?
No need to have two ways to do one
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
224.0.0.251 is the multicast address for mDNS.
That could be correct. Honestly, I'm not sure. I believe you. :-P
But that's not the weird part to me.
[howl] error sending packet to 224.0.0.251 (23126)
[assert] error:
Hi,
I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a
way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip
address. Is there a way to do this in snmpd.conf or should I look to
a pf solution?
Thanks,
JL
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Jurvis LaSalle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a
way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip address.
Is there a way to do this in snmpd.conf or should I look to a pf
did you check /etc/netstart? there's a blurb in there about
configuring a multicast host.
No I didn't. I'm pretty sure that's exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks
a lot for the quick and helpful response.
-- Jeremy
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:53 PM, James Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to
ldattach(8) now.
Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in
On 6/9/08, Per-Olov Sjvholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2008 15.42.37 you wrote:
On 2008-06-05, Per-Olov Sjvholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server
from
OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std install, but a
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:52:24PM -0700, James Hartley wrote:
For those interested, Marc has more information posted on undeadly.com.
Ahem. http://undeadly.org/
Thanks again, Marc!
Indeed. :)
-ME
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jeremy Karlson wrote:
Has anyone had any success setting up Howl (Zeroconf) on OpenBSD 4.3.
I've done a lot of Googling and read the (minimal) docs, but I can't get
it working. I'm unable to determine if I'm doing something incorrectly,
or if it is a problem with Howl, or
So, this is not perl? :-)
Actually, I heard another OS can have 5 or more APIs to do the same
thing (say, listing a directory) because one team wants it this way,
and another doesn't.
On 6/9/08, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer [EMAIL
On 2008-06-09, Jeremy Karlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had any success setting up Howl (Zeroconf) on OpenBSD 4.3.
I've done a lot of Googling and read the (minimal) docs, but I can't get
it working. I'm unable to determine if I'm doing something incorrectly,
or if it is a problem
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Katarzyna Kaczor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
Would you like to reach to the large audience of BSD Magazine?
I am happy to announce that we started News Section on BSD Magazine website.
In this bookmark you can place news, press releases, latest and
41 matches
Mail list logo
