Unlike the western governments who don't give a shit about anyone or
anything as long as the super elite bankers are feeding them... As a British
citizen, I can say whole heartedly, mine and America's political system is
just BS, lets get the bankers to tell us what to do. Would you like an RFID
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 10.50.28 you wrote:
Hi
Tools - Language - For all text - Hungarian
Thanks, that is working, but how can I make this permanent? Right now this
only works for the opened document, and gets lost after a restart.
I've installed OO.org3, and openoffice3-dicts (hu_HU, en_US
I'm sorry for this. This was supposed to go to po...@...
Daniel
--
LIVAI Daniel
PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1
Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412 2D83 1373 917A 4AC0 A4B1
Cocons, spectacle de cirque airien
Aerial circus with high stunt-flying and pyrotechnic
2 versions : en salle ou en plein air
Compagnie des Triteaux du Coeur Volant
Contact tournie : Lochness Production - +33 (0) 1 48 58 13 21 - +33 (0) 6 85
10 28 55 - lochn...@inbox.as
* mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com [2009-05-19 07:29]:
Otto, Henning and Stuart to-the-point answers. Thanks guys. I have taken
the post over to FreeBSD list. However, Henning, I am curious why you call
pf on anything but OpenBSD a starter drug? Is the performance difference
that huge? pf
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really interesting IMHO:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/11/01/whats-new-in-bsd-42.html
Hope it helps you feel the need of trying pf _at home_ :)
Theo is right here. They really don't care. I won't dwelve into details but I
worked for a service that used their product, with a government-level contract,
and the only thing we waited for was the end of the contract to stop using
their products, which we did. We had had a contract with them,
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really interesting IMHO:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you should use the latest version available, but what
On 10:02, Tue 19 May 09, Mark Romer wrote:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Mark Romer wrote:
but what does everything else think?
Your oldtimer has confused OpenBSD with the Linux kernel...
--
Monty Brandenberg
From: Mark Romer romes...@gmail.com
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8,
4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you should use
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Mark Romer wrote:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I
Weirdest thing I have ever heard. Unless you want to stick to annual
update schedules and picked one or the other. I do remember the
microsoft and novell service packs even an odd numbering but openbsd has
better quality standards than it has to ship NOW.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Mark Romer wrote:
| Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
| and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
| 4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
| I
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:52:03PM +0200, I?igo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
Hi all,
I was trying to make documents in :
$ pwd
/usr/share/doc/psd
$
and get :
$ sudo make
=== 05.sysman
tbl 0.t 1.0.t 1.1.t 1.2.t 1.3.t 1.4.t 1.5.t 1.6.t 1.7.t 2.0.t 2.1.t 2.2.t 2.3.t
2.4.t 2.5.t a.t | groff -M/usr/share/tmac -ms paper.ps
a.t:85: warning: `3section' not defined
a.t:80:
Mark Romer, 05/19/09 17:02:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you should use the latest
Or use Pi. Since the Borwein-Beiley-Plouffe equation we can compute any Pi
decimal anywhere anyplace in Pi without calculating the previous decimals, and
it is a known scientific fact that every OpenBSD that came and will come until
the universe becomes a silent, cold and dark place, is
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Mark Romer wrote:
| Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
| and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
| 4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure
Mark Romer romes...@gmail.com writes:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you should
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Mark Romer wrote:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I
When I've required it, I used Smart BootManager
http://sourceforge.net/projects/btmgr/
Now seeing as it hasn't really been updated since 2001 GAG might be better..
2009/5/18 Bryan bra...@gmail.com:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:19, Joachim Schipper
I multi-boot Vista/OpenBSD on one of my
El mar, 19-05-2009 a las 09:28 +0100, Michal escribiC3:
Unlike the western governments who don't give a shit about anyone or
anything as long as the super elite bankers are feeding them... As a British
citizen, I can say whole heartedly, mine and America's political system is
just BS, lets get
Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
I think it's the reverse. Only install the odd numbered ones.
I had to run the single processor kernel in 4.4 because it didn't
like booting off the second CPU. I should have skipped that release.
Ah, extrapolation from a sample of one. Very scientific.
Artur Grabowski wrote:
Mark Romer romes...@gmail.com writes:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered.
[...] but what does
everything else think?
He's odd.
Sounds like a candidate for the
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:54 PM, OpenBSD openbbs...@gmail.com wrote:
El mar, 19-05-2009 a las 09:28 +0100, Michal escribiC3:
Unlike the western governments who don't give a shit about anyone or
anything as long as the super elite bankers are feeding them... As a British
citizen, I can say
Richard recommends you visit the following link.
This is Kofos Metal Works sellers of scrap metals world wide. Used Rail
and hms 12 FOB 140 per/MT..CIF 170 per/MT we are sellers of scrap
metals you can contact us through our email:kmw_gh...@yahoo.com We also
encourage that you visit our yard to
Hello all,
I've looked over the ifconfig man page and can't find a way to set a specific
interface to PROMISC mode on 4.4, for example:
vr0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
Here's another example of that this possible:
sis0:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:15:51PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Mark Romer wrote:
| Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
| and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
| 4.2, 4.4
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Fortunato
fortunato.montre...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hello all,
I've looked over the ifconfig man page and can't find a way to set a specific
interface to PROMISC mode on 4.4, for example:
ifconfig can't be used to set an interface to promiscuous. You can
use
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Fortunato
fortunato.montre...@earthlink.net wrote:
...
Is there a way to set the flags to PROMISC for an interface?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Philip Guenther
Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
without running tcpdump in the background if possible. (I'll take this as a
learning moment otherwise.) I'm trying to use the first vr[0-3] interfaces like
an L2 switch in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Ted
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Fortunato
fortunato.montre...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
without running tcpdump in the background if possible.
The interfaces are put into promiscuous mode automatically when
there's something
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Fortunato
fortunato.montre...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
without running tcpdump in the background if possible. (I'll take this as a
learning moment otherwise.) I'm trying to use the first vr[0-3]
Grazie,
For some reason when I put all the vr interfaces in the bridge at first, there
was no forwarding. (I did not verify nor know about the PROMISC settings at the
time.) After much tinkering, it works and brconfig does set the interfaces on
PROMISC.
Thanks to all,
-Original
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:03:40PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Fortunato
fortunato.montre...@earthlink.net wrote:
...
Is there a way to set the flags to PROMISC for an interface?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Although not the original poster,
cwm(1) keeps dying with various _group messages after I installed
the May 18th snapshot for amd64.
If sticky yes is set in ~/.cwmrc then as soon as I open a window
(say an xterm) it dies with the following message:
cwm: _group_add: a ctx is NULL
If I don't set this option then cwm(1) does not
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 03:18:04PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Hi Guys,
I finally got rid of my old access point and bought an internal pci
wireless card to put on my openbsd firewall. But i've been having some
weird freezes. It simply stop sending packets for some seconds, and
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:38:50AM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
cwm(1) keeps dying with various _group messages after I installed
the May 18th snapshot for amd64.
If sticky yes is set in ~/.cwmrc then as soon as I open a window
(say an xterm) it dies with the following message:
cwm:
On 2009-05-19, Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote:
cwm(1) keeps dying with various _group messages after I installed
the May 18th snapshot for amd64.
please check if you can reproduce in -current;
$ cvs get -P -d cwm xenocara/app/cwm
$ cd cwm
$ make sudo make install
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:47:35AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:38:50AM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
cwm(1) keeps dying with various _group messages after I installed
the May 18th snapshot for amd64.
If sticky yes is set in ~/.cwmrc then as soon as I open a
On Wed 2009.05.20 at 00:38 +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
cwm(1) keeps dying with various _group messages after I installed
the May 18th snapshot for amd64.
If sticky yes is set in ~/.cwmrc then as soon as I open a window
(say an xterm) it dies with the following message:
cwm: _group_add: a
44 matches
Mail list logo
