On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 07:12:17PM -0800, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote:
The 1.5 TB hard drive is partitioned in three equal partition
so I have a chance to pass the fsck if ever needed.
You may still have difficulty passing fsck.
By default OpenBSD will attempt to fsck all three partitions in
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
On 2/26/10 7:44 PM, Citra Cool wrote:
Can I selling openBSD in CD for profit??
You can always become an OpenBSD reseller if you want.
If my memory served me right, you can buy the CD in bulk directly from Theo.
If
Hi all,
someone is using robocode app from http://robocode.sourceforge.net/ ?
After change of memory settings for Java in robocode.sh to 256M and
modifications of permissions for me I can start this app, build robots
and do all of the stuff, BUT : there is not battlefield displayed and
robots so
~~~
15 - 16 PP0QQP0 2010 P3PP4P0.
PP P P!PP PP P P+P P PPP PP PPP: P P PPPPP'PP PP P
PP!P P PP,PP PPP PP
~~~
P!P5PP8P=P0Q P P PPP PPP PP'PP P4P;Q:
* Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com [2010-02-28 10:07]:
Well as previously explained, the BSD license doesn't stop you from
burning the OpenBSD ISO n-1 times and selling the CDs for $5 or $50,
except that the openbsd cd layout is not BSD licensed. you are not
allowed to burn the iso and
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de writes:
except that the openbsd cd layout is not BSD licensed. you are not
allowed to burn the iso and sell that.
It's the layout of the official CD sets that's explicitly not BSD
licensed, isn't it?
The official CD sets contain a collection of packages
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de writes:
except that the openbsd cd layout is not BSD licensed. you are not
allowed to burn the iso and sell that.
It's the layout of the official CD sets that's explicitly not BSD
licensed, isn't it?
The official CD
Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz writes:
Anyone that remains a client, will need to continue to buy those
CD's and support to remain up to date.
Yes. Just in case anybody reading this has any doubts:
Yes, you can sell OpenBSD materials for profit. The smart way to
start doing
Not true. fsck will only do a parallel check
the partitions are on a separate device.
That makes sense. You would have a lot of disk thrashing if you tried to check
two partitions in parallel on the same drive.
On 2010-02-27, Duncan Patton a Campbell campb...@neotext.ca wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:58:30 -0500
Dan Harnett dan...@harnett.name wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:30:47AM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
I've just installed a server using current and have found that
there are
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
SATA ii
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
database you're going to be running.
In addition to helping you choose hardware to fit your needs, they'll
totally pimp your configs,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
database you're going to be running.
In addition to
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
The smfb(4) framebufer just does not support more than one screen.
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Peter Hessler wrote:
We don't provide multiple terminals for the loongson platform. You
can use tmux, or start X instead.
Thanks Otto and Peter. It has been a
Hi
You are missing -c, su passes its arguments directly to sh so you are in
effect
running sh /usr/bin/tmux rather than sh -c /usr/bin/tmux.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:00:16PM +0200, Lars Nooden wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
The smfb(4) framebufer just does not support more
On 2/28/2010 12:02 PM, Andres Salazar wrote:
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
takes 45min is far better hardware then a DualCore, in this case a
QuadCore with SATA II/sata...
None of us
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar ndrsslz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:01:20 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2010-02-27, Duncan Patton a Campbell campb...@neotext.ca wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:58:30 -0500
Dan Harnett dan...@harnett.name wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:30:47AM -0700, Duncan Patton a
18 matches
Mail list logo
