Hello! Is it right mailing list? Please help I am new here.
There is xlife v5.3 cellular automaton laboratory program at
http://openports.se/games/xlife
This program was developed by Eric Raimonds (esr) at 1993-1998. Its
development was also affected by the work of Achim Flammenkamp during the
On 07/17/2012 08:49 AM, thus Otto Moerbeek spake:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, Bernd wrote:
On 07/17/2012 08:32 AM, thus Matthew Dempsky spake:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Bernd
wrote:
I could provide shell access to a SS20 with 256MByte RAM and two
75MHz SuperSPARC II CPUs
I want to ask if anyone else is seeing the same issue.
My bgp session is still dropping with "bad VPNv4 withdraw prefix", and I
got to the point where it looks like the problem is only where
MP_UNREACH_NLRI is set, so only on withdraw routes.
Below is the update packet that breaks the session.
0
I have an SS20 in the loft (Manchester, UK) as it's too noisy and slow for me
now. It's very low end though IIRC one CPU @ 40MHz and 32 or 64MB RAM.
Transport to other countries is probably a mite expensive due to weight, mind..
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, B
Hi,
I'm trying to make an simple MPLS network. I desided to use OpenBSD, and I
sucessful implemented mpls ipv4 network by using great document
http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/papers/jeker/MPLS.pdf.(I will use nomenclature
from this document in this post) My network looks similar like network on
page 6
I can send a Ross Hypersparc 100 or 125 Mhz if needed ...
Am 17.07.2012 um 10:17 schrieb Peter Kay:
> I have an SS20 in the loft (Manchester, UK) as it's too noisy and slow for
me now. It's very low end though IIRC one CPU @ 40MHz and 32 or 64MB RAM.
Transport to other countries is probably a mit
We do not yet have IPv6 rdomain support. I am working on it, but it is
not yet production ready. After 5.2, for sure.
On 2012 Jul 17 (Tue) at 11:20:08 +0200 (+0200), Krzysztof Kułaj wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I'm trying to make an simple MPLS network. I desided to use OpenBSD, and I
:sucessful implemented m
Nope. This requires KMS, or a large amount of changes to the X driver,
to get working. You'll either need to wait[1] or add the support.
[1] No, we do not have a time frame.
On 2012 Jul 17 (Tue) at 14:43:07 +0300 (+0300), Gregory Edigarov wrote:
:anybody?
:
:# xvinfo
:X-Video Extension version
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> anybody?
>
> # xvinfo
> X-Video Extension version 2.2
> screen #0
> no adaptors present
The intel driver in OpenBSD does not support Xv on this chipset yet.
> >vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel HD Graphics 2000" rev 0x09
> >
For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
hardware where it's needed.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Tom Knienieder wrote:
> I can send a Ross Hypersparc 100 or 125 Mhz if needed ...
>
> Am 17.07.2012
Good idea! That is a nice way of helping
// Johan
2012/7/17 Gerald Thornberry :
> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
> hardware where it's needed.
My university had plenty of those 7 years ago
institue galilée / universitée paris XIII
they may have dumped them
2012/7/17 Johan Ryberg
> Good idea! That is a nice way of helping
>
> // Johan
>
> 2012/7/17 Gerald Thornberry :
> > For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "ship
© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C. Incluye Temas Críticos Sobre:
Cierre de Gestión, Observaciones y Responsabilidades
Asista a los 46 Mejores Cursos en México de la Serie:
ENTREGA-RECEPCIÓN
LIBRO BLANCO Y MEMORIAS DOCUMENTALES Cursos, Contenidos y Metodologías
Desarrollados en Alianza con las
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:09:54AM +, John Long wrote:
>> > >
>>
>> > I see now th
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>
>> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > On
This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to follow...
-- p
Argg, was using the wrong names.
Notebook is called Yeeloong, mini-PC Fuloong. Processor Loongson.
-Otto
where are Loongson 3 b
>Can anyone help with a little amd problem?
>
>I have some partitions on SSD and some on HD and would like to use
>amd(8) so that the HD filesystems are only mounted on-demand, reducing
>fsck time in a crash.
>
>I've got them mounting OK...
>
>$ cat /etc/amd/master
>-c 60 -x all -l syslog /a bamboo
Bonjour,
NORD SUD TELECOM vous propose des solutions innovantes pour
lâenregistrement des conversations téléphoniques de lâentreprise.
Notre méthode de travailler a changé, La téléphonie est devenue un outil
Incontournable dans le monde professionnel. Un grand nombre de communications
Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose?
Cheers,
Percy.
Index: scheduler.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/scheduler.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 scheduler.c
--- scheduler.c 10 Jul 2012 11:1
mh, is it really that verbose ?
Gilles
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:54:41PM +0100, percy piper wrote:
> Any objections to making the scheduler a little less verbose?
>
> Cheers,
> Percy.
>
> Index: scheduler.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs
I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I
assume you want it that way for a reason.
It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-)
Thanks for looking Gilles.
Percy.
On 17 July 2012 19:04, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> mh, is it really that verbose ?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:32:38PM +0100, percy piper wrote:
> I'd say twice per message processed is unnecessarily verbose but I
> assume you want it that way for a reason.
>
ok that's too verbose indeed.
> It is a trivial niggle and probably irritates only me :-)
>
no i can understand, i us
FESTIVAL LE CHIEN A PLUMES /// 2.3.4.5 AOUT 2012
LANGRES - Lac de Villegusien - 52
QUOI DE NEUF ?? Au chien à plumes ...
_
___
LA PROGRAMMATION DEFINITIVE !!
Après les bonnes surprises que sont les
On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
> hardware where it's needed.
I need to get a SS20 to phessler@ from the Uk to Germany if people want t
On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
>
>> For those of us who don't have the hardware, is there a "shipping
>> fund" we could donate to? I wouldn't mind chipping in to help get the
>> hardware where it's needed.
>
> I need t
> Note that all this is because of PMON bugs, we did our best to
> circumvent the bugs, but this is the best we can do.
No, we can do better. The real pie-in-the-sky fix is to do what had been
done on hp300 30 years ago: make the bootloader actually be a kernel
without userland, scheduling and in
> This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
> available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to
> follow...
Nope, you are confusing things.
1, 1A, 1B: 32-bit only processors. Move along.
2, 2A, 2B, 2C: 64-bit but extra instructions conflict with off
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> This is still based on the fairly old Loongson 2F; the gen-3 CPUs being
>> available only in laptops, right? Not the easiest naming scheme to
>> follow...
>
> Nope, you are confusing things.
>
> 1, 1A, 1B: 32-bit only processors. Move along.
>
> where are Loongson 3 based computers available?
In dreamland only.
> how can loongson 3 be (roughly) compared to x86 CPUs in performance?
It's slower. A hell lot slower.
3A systems are running at around 1GHz. The x86 code translation stuff
was benchmark-only and, to the best of my knowledge,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:12AM +, John Long wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul
Thanks for the great work and the informative posts. I'm saving the info for
future reference. Especially the history on the Loongson line is great to
know.
>> how can loongson 3 be (roughly) compared to x86 CPUs in performance?
>
>It's slower. A hell lot slower.
>
>3A systems are running at around 1GHz. The x86 code translation stuff
>was benchmark-only and, to the best of my knowledge, has never been made
>public (with full source code and acceptable
Is there nobody with a config that allows pmtu discovery with ipsec?
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:49:31PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
> We got notice from a customer who connects to us through an ipsec tunnel
> that loading websites on our site is really slow. On our site we use
> Open
I'm sure IndieGoGo would be happy to help out. Worked for Matthew Inman anyway.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>
>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 13:50, Gerald Thornberry wrote:
>>
>>> For those of us who don't have the hardw
andrea.jpg
miranda.jpg
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
9f183befcab3ac8b2011967ba1a4d0a9]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
43ed3e5be87b0997c059fa628c4a618b]
36 matches
Mail list logo