In 2019 still there is not a great desktop experience for NetBSD. However,
the new "OS108" is seeking to improve this with a NetBSD operating system
paired with the MATE desktop environment.
So, OS108, a derivative of NetBSD, has just been released:
Hi all,
I am buliding an Internet-facing firewall plus router on the bare metal
of a small and quiet machine at home. I am investigating OpenBSD+pf and
NetBSD+npf, and will choose either one depending on many factors.
I considered pfSense, but I would rather use a plain operating system
and
Can you define "great desktop experience" ?
what window managers have you tried on OpenBSD,
there are are a few included in base..and you can also load more with
pkg_add
for ease of use / transitioning from windows ..I find xfce quite nice...
All the Best,
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at
On May 6, 2019 8:55:41 PM UTC, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>Hi all
>
> Has anyone actually tried to use that controller on a fresh or older
>OpenBSD? If yes: successful?
>
> I found hints in the 6.5 ports tree relating to that controller (and
>the sdl2 package seems to be part of the regular
Hello,
Is it possible to nat both source and destination IP on the same openbsd pf
instance aka double nat ?
If yes do someone has an example of it ?
Thank you
C4SEM Enterprises Inc | 3001 S Madison St, | Muncie Indiana | 47302 US
Manage your subscription:
http://app.scsend.com/?e=email/subscription/14ooqlk0tJ5kwBsAdYK7uOzKRd9X9LW533xUlmtnc5VgQdnZUCZ3o0tg
Update your preferences:
hi everyone
when upgrading my laptop which is encrypted with a keydisk
i assume that i boot the 6.5 kernel which will be on a usb stick with
the keydisk inserted,
will the hard drive still be decrypted and upgraded,
also will the encryption step need to be redone or will the keydisk
continue to
On 05/06, shadrock uhuru wrote:
hi everyone
when upgrading my laptop which is encrypted with a keydisk
i assume that i boot the 6.5 kernel which will be on a usb stick with
the keydisk inserted,
will the hard drive still be decrypted and upgraded,
yes
also will the encryption step need to be
Hi all
Has anyone actually tried to use that controller on a fresh or older
OpenBSD? If yes: successful?
I found hints in the 6.5 ports tree relating to that controller (and
the sdl2 package seems to be part of the regular packages tree, too)
../ports/devel/premake4/files/scripts.c
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 16:55, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Has anyone actually tried to use that controller on a fresh or older
> OpenBSD? If yes: successful?
>
> I found hints in the 6.5 ports tree relating to that controller (and
> the sdl2 package seems
Hello,
Now that 6.5 is out I was wondering what is the best approach of upgrading my
OpenBSD 6.4 VMM virtualization server, should I first upgrade the VMM
hypervisor host from 6.4 to 6.5 and then afterwards the virtual machines from
6.4 to 6.5? That would make sense to me but I just wanted to
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:51:02PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> This is 6.5-current on an old ALIX 2D3 (full dmesg below) using
> athn0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 "Atheros AR9280" rev 0x01: irq 9
> athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address 04:f0:21:01:d6:86
>
> It is my home router. I am seeing
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 07:01:55PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
After upgrading Firefox today to 66.0.3 in -current, all my add-ons
were inactivated. A quick search showed that this is a widespread
problem,
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:16:18AM +, mabi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that 6.5 is out I was wondering what is the best approach of upgrading my
> OpenBSD 6.4 VMM virtualization server, should I first upgrade the VMM
> hypervisor host from 6.4 to 6.5 and then afterwards the virtual machines
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 6, 2019 1:32 PM, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> There are no order. But I would upgrade the host, then the VM, this
> requires only one downtime for the whole stack.
Thanks for confirming, I will then do so.
trondd writes:
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 3:57 pm, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > My goals are:
> >
> > * /etc/rc already handles fsck of plaintext devices mentioned in
> > /etc/fstab.
> > * /etc/rc already handles mount of plaintext devices mentioned in
> > /etc/fstab.
> > * I would like to activate
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:54:04AM +0300, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 07:01:55PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > After upgrading Firefox today to 66.0.3 in -current, all my add-ons
>
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 05:41:38PM -0400, trondd wrote:
| It's really not that big of a deal to call 'fsck' and 'mount' yourself in
| rc.local.
It's not, but it would be nice if this could be done automatically
somehow, for services that start at boot (e.g. httpd) that need data
on other softraid
They already fixed it a couple of hours after the issue.
Em seg, 6 de mai de 2019 às 11:45, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i...@juanfra.info> escreveu:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:54:04AM +0300, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 10:13:39PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero
Ingo, and Everyone,
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:58:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote on Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:34:04PM +0200:
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 01:07:34AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Spend a little time learning OpenBSD,
Yes: time needed, I
20 matches
Mail list logo
