Re: Having PF enabled breaks up rsync (and scp) over ssh connections

2020-03-06 Thread Jyri Hovila [Turvamies.fi]
Hi! > Look at pfctl -ss -v. Do you have "wscale" values printed for most > TCP connections? There's wscale for all the active connections, at least at the moment. > If not then you are likely creating state on intermediate > rather than ACK packets (window scaling values are not present in most

Re: Having PF enabled breaks up rsync (and scp) over ssh connections

2020-03-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/03/06 18:53, Jyri Hovila [Turvamies.fi] wrote: > Hi! > > > Look at pfctl -ss -v. Do you have "wscale" values printed for most > > TCP connections? > > There's wscale for all the active connections, at least at the moment. > > > If not then you are likely creating state on intermediate >

Re: Compiler warning in ctype.h

2020-03-06 Thread Thomas de Grivel
Hello, I was using base gcc but switching to base clang fixes the warnings on -current at least. Is base gcc not supported anymore ? Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 à 16:59, Theo de Raadt a écrit : > > Todd C. Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:07:48 +0100, Thomas de

Re: Having PF enabled breaks up rsync (and scp) over ssh connections

2020-03-06 Thread Jyri Hovila [Turvamies.fi]
Hi! > Thanks, and sorry I missed in your previous mail that things were working > OK before. In which case it doesn't sound like a configuration problem > which I wasn't sure about. Thank you for helping in the debugging, and no need for apologies! > Do you have any logs that might help tie it

Re: Extra Group in lndir policy

2020-03-06 Thread Ricardo Mestre
thanks, we have removed the wpath promise from pledge(2) on lndir(1) On 20:19 Thu 05 Mar , shankarapailoor . wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Openbsd 6.5 and noticed that the pledge policy for lndir > includes wpath but I don't see why this group is necessary. I have removed > the group and

Re: Help: System hang/Lockup using snapshots on Intel i5 NUC?

2020-03-06 Thread Bruno d'Arcangeli
Le Thursday 05 Mar 2020 à 23:45:30 (+0100), Why 42? The lists account. a écrit: > > Hi All, > > We've been running OpenBSD on a server for several years now and its been > reliable with minimal issues, so I thought I would also like to try it as > a desktop system. > > Thus I've been

Re: Help: System hang/Lockup using snapshots on Intel i5 NUC?

2020-03-06 Thread Andrew Daugherity
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:48 PM Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > The OpenBSD kernel tells me that there is a serial port / UART (com0 at > isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550 ...) but I've taken the NUC to pieces > and I cannot see anything on the board that looks like a serial port > header. I

Re: Help: System hang/Lockup using snapshots on Intel i5 NUC?

2020-03-06 Thread Raymond, David
You might try an alternate desktop/window manager such as lxqt or icewm and see if the problem persists. When I tried XFCE on my X1 carbon laptop, XFCE was not so nice, though I can't remember the details at this point. Dave Raymond On 3/5/20, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > Hi All, > >

Re: upgrade i386 kernel to amd64

2020-03-06 Thread rgc
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:14:06PM -0800, Justin Muir wrote: > If so, just upgrade system? Re-compile kernel? Other options? hi, i had the unenviable experience to downgrade an amd64 to i386 system with 6.6-current. this method is unsupported. i wanted to have a 32-bit cross compile system for