Regards.
I have a problem with pf synproxy.
I set up:
pass in on fxp0 proto tcp from any to $server_ip port www flags S/SA
synproxy state
pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
After this, when I want to connect to my webserver I get this for:
pfctl -s a | grep self
self tcp server-ip:80 - my-ip:43264
On 5/20/05, Adam Papai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem with pf synproxy.
To add to the other report on pf's synproxy fules, this may be
another instance of the same problem.
Running -current (built this morning, but my -current of 2 days ago
suffered the same problem), it seems I
I will be out of the office until Monday, May 23rd, and will not be able to
access my emails. I'll respond to your email when I return.
If you need immediate assistance, you should contact Justin Harclerode at
(202) 226-8767.
It's great to see torrents. Of course with my connection I doubt it's
any faster but at least it relieves the mirrors, which is always good
around release.
Am I right in this is what your intended to do:
Grab the torrent you want (btlaunchmanycurses.py :)), once finished
just leave it seeding
On May 20, 2005, at 2:47 AM, Adam Papai wrote:
Regards.
I have a problem with pf synproxy.
I set up:
pass in on fxp0 proto tcp from any to $server_ip port www flags S/SA
synproxy state
pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
After this, when I want to connect to my webserver I get this for:
pfctl -s a | grep self
Hi,
Firstly, 3.7 seems awesome so far ;)
I've tried to install on my laptop for the first time (in anticipation
of getting a wireless NIC that doesn't have a TI chipset) but I've run
into an annoying issue with X.
X works fine, the display is perfect, but when I switch to a console
using
Manon Goo wrote:
Hi,
I have setup openbgp on two routers (Config below). I am connecting to
two uplink routers at my ISP.
My ISP Complains that one of the his sessions allways is idle. (He is
running a cisco
12000 IOS 12.0.something) and this is filling his logs.
Might this be because of the state
Because it's the source? I was trying to work that one out too but
didn't really get around to working it out.
Dan
On 5/20/05, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/05, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get OpenBSD 3.7 from the torrent site here:
Hi all,
As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released, I've got some doubts about the OpenBSD
releases. Do the OpenBSD 3.6 packages run under OpenBSD 3.7? Is the kernel
different one another? Can a module be loaded under both OpenBSD 3.6 and
OpenBSD 3.7 with no changes in its source code or parameters? For
On Friday 20 May 2005 03:59 am, Stephan Wehner wrote:
What am I trying to back up?
What happened to me was I was running Mepis, and did an apt-get xfce4
(I think it was xfcr4). But then startx wouldn't work any longer. I
thought apt-get would be pretty safe...
Then I switched to FreeBSD and
Lots of mirrors are missing the same files!
Wijnand
On May 20, 2005, at 9:24 AM, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released, I've got some doubts about the OpenBSD
releases.
Do the OpenBSD 3.6 packages run under OpenBSD 3.7?
I wouldn't bet on it.
Is the kernel
different one another?
Yes.
Can a module be loaded under both OpenBSD
We ditched Dell due to their pricing and delivery times.
When dell goes and say shop at dell and avoid the middleman then i
expect to get a cheaper computer, As they say them selves, they don't
have any stoch, they don't have any shops you buy directly from them.
When i buy i then have to wait
Jo?o Salvatti on 2005-05-20 10:24:58 -0300:
As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released, I've got some doubts about the OpenBSD
releases.
I highly suggest you read the FAQ - http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/
Do the OpenBSD 3.6 packages run under OpenBSD 3.7?
No.
Is the kernel different one another?
Yes.
Your questions clearly indicate that you cam from Linux. In our
world you are supposed to find these things out all by yourself. So
do everyone a favor and start reading the FAQ and other resources.
On May 20, 2005, at 8:24 AM, Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released,
On 5/20/05, Dan Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it's the source?
That precesily the reason why those files should be available in that link.
I was trying to work that one out too but
didn't really get around to working it out.
??
Dan
On 5/20/05, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:56:34PM -0700, Stephan Wehner wrote:
What is recommended for bare-metal backups? Scenario: I build a new
application, but something breaks and I want to revert back. I thought
a neat way would be to have the whole system under version control.
Can it be done reliably
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
As the OpenBSD 3.7 was released, I've got some doubts about the OpenBSD
releases. Do the OpenBSD 3.6 packages run under OpenBSD 3.7? Is the kernel
different one another? Can a module be loaded under both OpenBSD 3.6 and
OpenBSD 3.7 with no changes in its source code or
Because many people don't realize that while OpenBSD is a Unix-ish
Operating System, it's meant to be taken as a whole, and reading
documentation isn't something many people do as a first (or even second)
step.
The fact that for many things in the computer world, you can't even GET
a printed
subversion it then... binary diffs are there :)
--- Timothy Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 03:59 am, Stephan Wehner
wrote:
What am I trying to back up?
What happened to me was I was running Mepis, and
did an apt-get xfce4
(I think it was xfcr4). But then startx
On Friday 20 May 2005 03:59 am, Stephan Wehner wrote:
What am I trying to back up?
What happened to me was I was running Mepis, and did an apt-get xfce4 (I
think it was xfcr4). But then startx wouldn't work any longer. I thought
apt-get would be pretty safe...
Then I switched to FreeBSD and
RISPOSTA AUTOMATICA
L'indirizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] non C( piC9 attivo.
Se desideri contattarci ti invitiamo a farlo attraverso questo indirizzo:
http://www.chatta.it/contattaci.asp
Cordiali Saluti
Lo Staff di www.Chatta.it
During upgrade, it will list the set selection. Does the upgrade
process detect what sets you selected for the previous install?
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
36 Water Street
POB 268
Wiscasset, Maine 04578
Tel: (207) 882-7552
FAX: (207) 882-7308
Email: [EMAIL
On May 20, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Brandon Mercer wrote:
Steve Loranz wrote:
I'm confused. The site says 3.7 was released yesterday just like
Theo's mail says. So, what is the CD claiming to be 3.7 that arrived
at my door at the end of April?
I agree. I ordered my set three mondays ago and it's not
All right, I've got it. I didn't want to mix different releases, I just wanted
to know why a OpenBSD 3.6 package didn't run under OpenBSD 3.7. I understand
that a module cannot be loaded due to structural kernel changes, but a package
is not so significant!! But I think excellent the way OpenBSD
Using cvs to back up the system is going to be very
inefficient, especially with binary files. I'd suggest
going with your idea of a system snapshot before any
major system changes. A straightforward dump(8) and
restore(8) is easy to set up and your backed up data
can also be restored just by
At 02:05 PM 5/20/2005 -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
All right, I've got it. I didn't want to mix different releases, I just wanted
to know why a OpenBSD 3.6 package didn't run under OpenBSD 3.7. I understand
that a module cannot be loaded due to structural kernel changes, but a package
is not so
On 5/20/05, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know, maybe it's a matter of uses and costumes but...
I wonder why people would need printed manuals to actually read them.
Yes, I know the convenience of having them printed but... not reading
them in the first (or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Simon Slater
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 1:09 PM
To: Stephan Wehner
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Safe development
Using cvs to back up the system is going to be very
inefficient, especially
On 5/20/05, Vladislav Belogrudov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. or from solaris, where s8 MUST run under s10 #:)
They put millions into making their systems compatible
(RESPECT)
Actually, there's some pretty prominent misinformation out there.
_Abolute OpenBSD_ (No Strarch) claims that one of
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Steve Loranz wrote:
I'm confused. The site says 3.7 was released yesterday just like
Theo's mail says. So, what is the CD claiming to be 3.7 that arrived
at my door at the end of April?
-steve
I heard that was a benefit given to folks who actually PAID for the OS.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake chefren (chefren):
Hm, I cannot get the audio working on the SC400's, I believe something is
wrong with the mixer. Tried 3.6 and all kind of patches.
Dell seems to hook up the ac97 stuff differently than most others.
On the Dells I've seen the
Hi all.
I recently upgraded my net connection from 10 to 100 Mbit,
and not surprisingly my old P-II 233 MHz didn't quite cut it anymore.
I'd get to around 45 Mbit throughput, at which point the irq
load would shoot to 90+%.
So I figured I'd try with an Ultra5, same thing, around 45
No, I believe some of the pre-orders for CDs were already delivered,
since they received (some of) the CDs a bit early.
Josh
On 5/20/05, Matthew Jenove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Loranz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused. The site says 3.7 was released yesterday just like
Theo's
On 5/20/05, Brian W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Steve Loranz wrote:
I'm confused. The site says 3.7 was released yesterday just like
Theo's mail says. So, what is the CD claiming to be 3.7 that arrived
at my door at the end of April?
-steve
I heard that was a
That's awesome news. I have the same setup (4cpu/16GB).
Thanks very much for the response (and ddp also)... I will
happily test anything that comes out.
On 5/19/05, Jason George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/05, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been searching but can't find
Hi misc
Can OpenBSD communicate with any UPS units over the serial port?
Does OpenBSD support shutting down the OS if an UPS runs out of power?
Tnx in advance
/Per-Olov Sjvholm
--
GPG keyID: 4DB283CE
GPG fingerprint: 45E8 3D0E DE05 B714 D549 45BC CFB4 BBE9 4DB2 83CE
--On 20 May 2005 23:11 +0200, Per-Olov SjC6holm wrote:
Can OpenBSD communicate with any UPS units over the serial port?
Does OpenBSD support shutting down the OS if an UPS runs out of power?
That's not an OS thing, it's done by separate software, e.g.
/usr/ports/sysutils/nut
On May 20, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi :)
I'm actually playing with bridge(4) for self-education purpose (for
now) and I have a small question.
Would it be totally stupid to separate a LAN from a DMZ using an
OpenBSD bridge ? If yes, why ?
What do you mean by separate? If
With 3.7 released, I figured this would be a great time to add wifi
ability to my firewall. Being a good boy, I checked the HCL at
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html to see which cards I should look for at
my local retailers. Several were in stock, so I grabbed one and
installed, only to find that
What do you mean by separate? If you're using a bridge, that
suggests you're *bridging* them together. Routing denotes some level
os separation. The purpose of a DMZ is to isolate hostile traffic.
If you're going to bridge this traffic with your LAN, you don't
really have a DMZ.
Allright,
i'd like to know if i'm parsing this right:
-[ isakmpd.policy(5) ]
When X509-based authentication is performed in Main Mode, any X509 cer-
tificates received from the remote IKE daemon are converted to very sim-
ple KeyNote credentials. The conversion is straightforward:
Jay Savage wrote:
On 5/20/05, Vladislav Belogrudov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. or from solaris, where s8 MUST run under s10 #:)
They put millions into making their systems compatible
(RESPECT)
Actually, there's some pretty prominent misinformation out there.
_Abolute OpenBSD_ (No
I should probably add that I did check the archives, where the solutions
tended to point towards Just buy an access point, they're just as
cheap. I would (they're around), but that defeats the intent of
learning how to do it, trying to reduce underdesk wire clutter, and
rewarding
On May 20, 2005, at 6:38 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Jason Dixon a icrit :
What do you mean by separate? If you're using a bridge, that
suggests you're *bridging* them together. Routing denotes some level
os separation. The purpose of a DMZ is to isolate hostile traffic.
If you're
45 matches
Mail list logo
