Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells
and whistles.
Anybody know what, if anything, it does that an
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:54:22 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 22:09 -0400, Jim Fron wrote:
What it does that an OBSD solution can't is be low power, cheap, and
bought off the shelf (maybe there are off-the-shelf suppliers of OBSD
machines, but they aren't in every strip
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 01:53:07PM -0700, Greg Thomas wrote:
Does anyone know if the RICOH R5C485 chipset is YENTA compliant and/or
will work with OpenBSD/i386? I haven't found a definitive answer
Googling. I have a Senao 802.11b card I'd like to use in a desktop
PC.
Yes, works out of the
Hi,
I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
buy a DSL-router? At least for a small home network.
Regards
Alex
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:14:54AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
pppoe0: flags=8851UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1492
dev: ne3 state: session
sid: 0xc368 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0 time: 0:2:38
inet 84.97.3.232 -- 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
|
| D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
| buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
| are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
| buy a
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells
and whistles.
Anybody know what, if
On 2005-08-03 03:03, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Anybody know what, if anything,
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:03:34 +1000, Rod.. Whitworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Hi,
I am curious to know if anyone is running OpenBGPd attached to a
loopback interface with specific listen directives for their BGP
sessions. In cisco land this is not atypical.
Are folks doing this with OpenBGPd? Would it even work as expected?
From just thinking about it for a
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:02:05PM +0200, umaxx wrote:
# ifconfig tun0 create
# ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 up
try
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 link0
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:03:23 +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
|
| D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
| buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
| are
While building 'cross-tools' on i386 host, OpenBSD 3.7 (with current
patches.)
Environment var: TARGET=m68k
From /usr/src
Command: make cross-tools (TARGET=m68k already defined in ENV )
...
Goes well for m68k build (always) until it gets into the 'libgcc2'
floating point
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
Something's screwy here, using the 'set -A' command in /bin/sh on
3.7-release. AFAICT the complicated file-match expression should (in
this case) produce the same results as the simple one, but it doesn't
seem to match at all when used in this script
See sh(1), under Command execution:
[...] Just to confuse things, if the posix option is turned off (see
the set command below), some special commands are very special in that
no field splitting, file globbing, nor tilde expansion is performed on
arguments that look like assignments.
Andreas
-Original Message-
From: Lars Hansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 12:20 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: authpf-like functionality via a web interface?
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:43:56 -0400
Barry, Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Authpf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Rod.. Whitworth
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:04 PM
To: Miscellaneous OBSD
Subject: Ammunition needed to defend OpenBSD/pf
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Bob Beck wrote:
SNIP
installer, and gives windows people putty with pages of 8x10 color
glossy screenshots with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back
of each one explaining how to install putty and authenticate (and pick
up the garbage).
your Windows users can
Hi jmc,
Thanks for your answer.
My connection works with an userland pppoe config (ppp.conf, ...).
I also tested with pf disabled. Same result... I cannot obtain my remote
address.
Unfortunately my local and remote (gateway) isp ip addresses are dynamic (so
I use wildcard addresses for both).
I am trying to setup the new in-kernel pppoe on a openbsd
3.7-stable with a
custom kernel.
snip, snip
pppoe0: flags=8851UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1492
dev: ne3 state: session
sid: 0xc368 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0 time: 0:2:38
inet
Hello all,
I've been setting up a hub and spoke VPN for a while now and for the
most part things are working as normal. However, I have one box a
netgear FVS318v1 that doesn't give me the flexibility in creating my VPN
policies and IKE setup that the other ones do (FVS318v3). I keep seeing
a no
I've made up a test LAN built on two mini-ITX Via C3 based board to test
the AES encryption functionality of this CPU on a real setup.
I've used flashboot 0.7.2 from Damien simply for a matter of time (I've
some flash card already configured) and since it seems to me a very good
product, the
I couldn't find a cksum file for any file in the release directory
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.#/*. I was just wanting to make
sure src.tar.gz was the correct file I was supposed to download.
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 02:11 schrieben Sie:
Hi Sebastian,
Are there any problems known with the raidframe-device?
Not that I know of.
In my case: I've a IBM X330 with dual P3 800Mhz and 2 SCSI-HDDs.
One is about 160Gb and the other is smaler. I created a raid for the /home
but today
Try to remove your /etc/mygate if exists.
Hi,
I have the same problem here in Hungary, running 3.7-
(almost)stable. My ISP is Axelero (T-Online Hungary now) and the
userland ppp worked like a charm. I switched to kernel pppoe but
it only works if I specify the remote peer (gateway) IP address
by
I do not know what a system looks like to an attacker trying to
fingerprint you using boxes from Office Depot.
However, I would hope that using OpenBSD/pf that I could advertise the
fact that I am using OpenBSD/pf, and someone would just move on to their
next target.
Sincerely, Rob
At 04:30 AM 8/3/05, Alexander Farber wrote:
I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
D-Link can DSL.
Does it really? My D-link router (at home) is tossing SYN attacks back to
the modem (as determined by ISP monitoring) causing the DSL modem to
lockup. I am eager to learn how to
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:30 +0200, Alexander Farber wrote:
Hi,
I have 1 argument for D-Link and against OpenBSD:
D-Link can DSL. OpenBSD can not. So you have to
buy at least a DSL modem for OpenBSD. And since you
are buying a DSL modem, why not add 20 Euros and
buy a DSL-router? At
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:47 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Rod.. Whitworth
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:04 PM
To: Miscellaneous OBSD
Subject: Ammunition needed to defend OpenBSD/pf
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:47 -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
Many of these devices provide the what if I get hit by a bus
protection of a simple, single purpose system. If you use something
like OpenBSD, it can be viewed as a homegrown application that must be
supported by the organization, and
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:35:07AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
your FUD look, just level with them. If you really want me to go
into all the various technical details involved in a full source
code audit the costs you would bear to do an equivalent audit on a
closed source binary through
That logic is completely false and you contradict yourself.
Allowing for multiple points of failure does not mean that something is
less
reliable as you have described. It means that if/when one fails, the
other
will still be available.
Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years,
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:15 pm, Jim O'Donald wrote:
Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that would
translate to 2 failures in 10 years, not 1 failure in 5 years.
And if the box is properly designed, it will continue running unless both
power supplies fail simultaneously
Hi all.
I'm setting up a laptop to generate test traffic against one of our APs so
that we can look at logs, pf configs etc. We have a Dell C840 laptop with
Proxim Orinoco 802.11b/g Gold PCMCIA card. As part of the testing, I'm
changing the MAC on the wireless card and refreshing the dhcp
On 08/03/05 20:55, Dave Feustel wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:15 pm, Jim O'Donald wrote:
Using your example of a power supply lasting 10 years, that would
translate to 2 failures in 10 years, not 1 failure in 5 years.
And if the box is properly designed, it will continue running
On 08/03/05 20:15, Jim O'Donald wrote:
That logic is completely false and you contradict yourself.
Pooh pooh.
Allowing for multiple points of failure does not mean that something is
less reliable as you have described. It means that if/when one fails, the
other will still be available.
But
I'm making OpenBSD's presence known at the OSCON expo right now,
sharing a booth with the FreeBSD/PC-BSD folks. They've been overly
generous, even allowing me to setup the OpenBSD/CARP/pfsync demo
servers that will also be in use at my presentation tomorrow (http://
On 8/3/05, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think everyone on this list has done a wonderful job explaining
why an OpenBSD box will beat the D-Link practically hands-down.
The cynical side of me thinks that managers, no matter how great the
reality of OpenBSD, are likely to reject it
I want to upgrade my OpenBSD firewall box and I want to know: is really
OK the version 3.7?
Thanks,
Denis
There are exemples for this configuration?
Thanks,
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 4:12 AM
To: Sean Knox
Cc: jeff; misc@openbsd.org; jking1
Subject: Re: DDOS Attack!!!who can help me?
Define a filter to drop
Hi,
did anyone here allready had a look at this book?
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mfreeopenbsd/index.html
After having read the sample chapter available for download, I'm
not yet convinced that it may be really interesting, and from the
title, TOC, and the reviews O'Reilly mentions[1], one
On 8/3/05, Denis Augusto Araujo de Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to upgrade my OpenBSD firewall box and I want to know: is really
OK the version 3.7?
In my experience, every release version of OpenBSD has beenOK,
ready for production use the day it is officially released. This isn't
chefren wrote:
Two equal power supplies in line: Twice as much the risk of a
brakedown of the system and two times as much failures of power supplies.
Lets see.
Let X be the (boolean) random variable designating ''system X breaks
down in the first N years''. Equally, let Y be the random
2005/8/3, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:01:48PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
The interview is at http://nedbsd.nl/modules/static/page/JorisVinkInterview
| Anything you want to add to this interview?
|
| Humppa!
I wonder wether the 3.8 song will be Humppa
please delete my details [EMAIL PROTECTED] as,I have never asked for
this service
On 8/3/05, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cynical side of me thinks that managers, no matter how great the
reality of OpenBSD, are likely to reject it based on a fear
and/or ignorance of open source, or with logic like, Well if it's
so good, how come I've never heard of it?
The same
etc and works fine. When we change the MAC to something random with ifconfig
and then associate, we get nothing.
No surprise here. When you change the lladdr you're only changing
what's sent as the source ethernet address on ethernet-style frames.
This will not affect the 802.11 level
This is what I have that I got working 2+ years ago... Hope this helps.
[Netgear-FVS318-main-mode]
EXCHANGE_TYPE= ID_PROT
Transforms=3DES-SHA,AES-SHA
[Netgear-FVS318-quick-mode]
DOI=IPSEC
EXCHANGE_TYPE=QUICK_MODE
Suites=QM-ESP-3DES-SHA-PFS-SUITE,QM-ESP-AES-SHA-PFS-SUITE
[AES-SHA]
just use some 50cal BMG rounds, that should be effective ammunition.
sorry, I just had to after following this thread for awhile
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Somebody sent me a query asking for a justification for my proposal to
supply a firewall/router using OpenBSD when there was thsi device:
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=327 , with all its claimed bells and
whistles.
Well, I we connected a new client with straight
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
For modem, sound and apm it says: Device not configured. For APM I
tried to set the apmd_flags=YES in rc.conf. For sound and modem I
tried the things that are described in
Z L wrote:
I installed OBSD3.7 on my laptop. Things that are not working are:
sound and modem (dial-up internal laptop modem) and apm.
For modem, sound and apm it says: Device not configured. For APM I
tried to set the apmd_flags=YES in rc.conf. For sound and modem I
tried the things that are
Dear Fool,
You've subscribed to the following Motley Fool Free Emails where we deliver our
best financial insights right to your inbox:
FoolWatch Daily
FoolWatch Weekly
Special Offers
Personal Finance
Investing Strategies: Mutual Funds
Investing Strategies: Value Plays
Investing Strategies:
The VT1211 chip is now supported thanks to some excellent work by
Alexander Yurchenko. Thanks for all the help, Alexander!
The Lex box actually keeps quite cool (~48 C) regardless of load,
probably due to the cpu-heatpipe. When I replace the hard drive with a
flash it will probably drop a
54 matches
Mail list logo
